Microstock Photography Forum - General > Photoshop Discussion

Deblurring

(1/4) > >>

sharpshot:
Just saw these photos of blurred images that have been deblurred using software under development with adobe.  If it looks this good on full size images, I might have to start saving up for the full version of photoshop.

http://www.petapixel.com/2011/10/17/before-and-after-comparisons-of-adobes-amazing-image-deblurring-feature/

icefront:
It's amazing with 200x200px resolution. I'm really excited to see what produces with 20mpx images. I hope, after de-blur, if I downsize the 20mpx image to 6-8, it will be completely usable...

travelstock:
I think I still prefer this version of the sample image:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/15543694@N06/5117266025#

 :)

FD:
If you look carefully at the shots, it's all about motion blur (camera shake) in one single dimension, not about 2-dimensional blur caused by lens blur. Of course, the first type can be mathematically solved since the translation path is determined. The second type can't be solved in principle, unless you integrate the info from many viewpoints (shots).

rubyroo:
Yes, wasn't that the point of displaying the curve?  I took that to be the path that the shaking movement had followed, and that the algorithm used that information to make the necessary calculations to correct the image.

Marvellous stuff.  I have a lot of old family photos from the 1940's onwards where a bit of camera-shake correction might do wonders to reveal what has previously been difficult to clearly see.

I hope this facility is included in the next version.  Great stuff.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page