MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Fred Miranda  (Read 9939 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

« on: November 11, 2007, 07:02 »
0
Has anyone used Fred Miranda's Photoshop plugins? I'm particularly interested in three of them ... the Velvia Vision one, the Intellisharpen, and the Resizer.

Any consumer reports? Good/bad experiences with these?

I have his DRI Pro (for landscapes with a high dynamic range - combining two images) and it works well, with quite a bit of control over the combining process. So I'm tempted to buy some more.


« Reply #1 on: November 11, 2007, 09:13 »
0
I used a couple of filters long ago. About 2 years ago, there was a post on Webaperture that they gone out of business. That is, somebody paid them, but never got the working version by email. They didn't reply to email either.

« Reply #2 on: November 11, 2007, 10:59 »
0
I bought quite a few of Fred Miranda's PS plugins - never had a problem during the actual purchasing. The Digital Velvia is really great - that is the ONLY tool that I use for adding saturation to my images. 

I bought several of the Intellisharpen plugins - one for all my different camera models. I use them extensively in my automated actions when I want to create downsized (1024x768) versions of my images for screen display. However, they are no good for preparing images for submission to stock sites. Contrary to the claim that they do not create artefacts they do indeed create artefacts when viewed at 100%. 

The resizer plugin you can skip. I found the normal bicubic downsizing (or upsizing) in PS give much better results. 
« Last Edit: November 11, 2007, 14:50 by Eco »

« Reply #3 on: November 12, 2007, 02:49 »
0

I used a couple of filters long ago. About 2 years ago, there was a post on Webaperture that they gone out of business. That is, somebody paid them, but never got the working version by email. They didn't reply to email either.


Okay. Thanks for the advice Eco. And they're not out of business.

I bought Velvia Vision and almost immediately had a problem with it. I work with a French-language version of Photoshop which (I've now discovered) uses a different filing system to the English one. And when I installed the Velvia plug-in it didn't work.

I e-mailed Fred Miranda (on a Sunday evening) and got a reply within the hour.

All's hunky-dory now, I've played with it a little and it looks to be a great addition.

gborce

« Reply #4 on: February 08, 2008, 20:41 »
0
I had a problem with velvia vision when it would create banding and noise on a blue sky. I really like the plugin, but i stopped using it very often. it is good for images with no large uniform color areas i guess.

« Reply #5 on: February 09, 2008, 04:41 »
0
An update from my experiences ...

I had some problems installing it because I run a French version of Photoshop which has a different folder structure. But I got a helpful response to my query and it's up and running now.

I haven't noticed the banding in uniform areas, but I have noticed that it puts quite a noticeable wide halo around certain objects if you use the 'Add Dynamic Range' option too vigorously.

Otherwise, it's great. I'm well satisfied. Used carefully it can add a beautiful depth and tone to otherwise slightly flat images. I'd recommend it.

(And, on a side note, it was reviewed last month in the UK magazine 'Photography Monthly'. It got a 'silver' rating and was only beaten by another program costing nearly 10 times as much.)

gborce

« Reply #6 on: February 09, 2008, 14:22 »
0
what is the other program? is there an online link to the article in the magazine?
thanks!

« Reply #7 on: February 09, 2008, 14:42 »
0
The program that came out top was Alien Skin Exposure 2.

Apparently, in UK it costs 130, whereas Fred Miranda's plugin costs 15

It seems that the Alien Skin program got top marks because you can simulate all sorts of film stock ... Kodachrome, Polaroid, and even Daguerrotypes. You can also add grain if you want.

I'm happy with the Fred Miranda one. I've no desire to pretend my photographs are Daguerrotypes or are grainy. If I tried that they'd probably get rejected by the microstocks for over-filtering or too much noise  :)
« Last Edit: February 10, 2008, 12:49 by Bateleur »

« Reply #8 on: February 09, 2008, 15:14 »
0
Alien Skin Exposure 2 is really fantastic. And you can use the contrast-colours of the various film types with the "no-grain" options to avoid noise rejections ;)

gborce

« Reply #9 on: February 09, 2008, 15:47 »
0
sounds intriguing.. do alien skin have demo version or trial?

gborce

« Reply #10 on: February 09, 2008, 15:48 »
0
and how about unintentional noise? does alien skin introduce any? since i was quite disappointed with velvia vision introducing noise, especially since the micros are so anal about it..

« Reply #11 on: February 09, 2008, 16:02 »
0
Basically what Alien Skin Exposure2 does is really simple. It's nothing else than a contrast curve together with some color filters added to mimick the behaviour of the various films.

So it doesn't add any noise or banding in itself BUT it could if the shots isn't properly exposed or lacks some dynamic range just the same as it could happen when you use curves, blending layers, levels etc.

For example I processed a shot of an orange with the velvia setting and it came out with the red channel bleeding everywhere, I switched to Astia and it was fine.


 

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors