pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - lucidology

Pages: [1]
1
Photo Critique / Re: Please critique 'poor lighting' rejection
« on: August 03, 2012, 20:29 »
It doesn't really matter if the highlights are clipping or not - they are horribly exposed in the first example with a direct reflection of the lights in the coins. You could have reduced them to grey and it still would attract the eye to the highlighted area. They are basically saying that your lighting is not good.

Steve
Thanks for the input. How specifically should the coins be lit? In the setup it's been diffused and passed through a cookie to add a pattern to it. Is it more diffusion it needs to make it appear less 'exposed'?

Also, are you saying the main problem is the coins and not the pig?

2
Photo Critique / Re: Please critique 'poor lighting' rejection
« on: August 03, 2012, 19:06 »
Thanks for your ideas. I can guarantee the highlights are not clipping on either image. However in order for something to appear shiny there have to be bright pixels. This SS image looks like the white may actually be clipping but they accepted it anyway.

http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-87890857/stock-photo-background-of-defocussed-golden-lights-with-sparkles-christmas-new-years-disco-party.html

I'll accept that the second one may appear too flat.

On the first image, it has shadows beneath the ears and I've heard SS doesn't like shadows, so maybe another light was needed shining directly into the piggy's face?

3
Photo Critique / Please critique 'poor lighting' rejection
« on: August 03, 2012, 18:22 »
Hi,
Here are two images I would appreciate help with.

http://imageshack.us/g/9/p1050950copysmall.jpg/

I submitted them as part of my shutterstock application and they were rejected as 'Poor or uneven lighting, or shadows. White balance may be incorrect.'

I would have been OK if the rejection had been something like, 'fake plastic gold coins are fake' but the lighting on these was something I had actually spent two or three days tweaking to get perfect, shooting many dozens of images to get a setup I liked.

The idea behind these was to use reflections to make the piggy appear shiny and 3D as opposed to the somewhat flat white shape it appears in real life.

These images have been accepted at every other stock site I've sent them to. I am not sure what I am supposed to do differently on these?

Thanks for your help!

5
I don't have any direct skin in that game, (IOW no real reason to care if Yuri succeeds or fails with his own site) but I think that he sells a one-look plastic fantastic type of stock. It's hugely successful but it really is so homogenous. I can't see it becoming dominant unless he broadens his reach a bit.

Are you serious? How exactly would you define dominant? He's the most successful stock photographer on the planet and therefore dominant.

Plastic fantastic is what faceless corporations want, isn't that obvious?

6
People have posted anecdotes that they often have had rejections that eventually sold well on other sites, but I haven't seen any specific examples of this.

It would be interesting to see if there's any commonality between them, it seems selective focus is a big killer in that it can both make an image work to call attention to the subject and therefore generate sales but also has the drawback that selective focus images often get automatically rejected by reviewers.

Natural sunlight seems to be something many people say reviewers often dislike and that it needs to be diffused for reviewers to pass it.

If you have an image that got rejected on one site and still made you money elsewhere, please post it to help us see what is going wrong in the reviewers' minds.

7
Newbie Discussion / Re: Alamy vs microstock
« on: July 13, 2012, 22:25 »


It's a picture of an image taken in 1953 of the Queen greeting Sir Edmind Hillary.


Great shot of a Masonic handshake

Pages: [1]

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors