I suggest you one thing: On Deep meta 2, until February you can see the latest dates of sales and which images relate (sales disappeared in the new system). I wait for the new royalty statement of March 20 to see if there are these sales, then I'll be very careful to look for the sold images, and if by chance I find a sale published on the internet with a reference to istock / getty, which did not give me my royalties, I am ready to start a class action.
Let us remember that, if this were so, the Getty is making money on our sales without giving us what is due!
This is called fraud.

Yesterday I made a couple of questions to Getty ...

Why the downloads that I find on this page
http://www.istockphoto.com/user_stats?id=12504814&Offset=-1&DownloadsGraphFileType=
are not present in the monthly summary of my royalty earnings? I have I have a few sales there.


And they said this:

"We have changed to an entirely new royalty system and some of the old stats that you are referring to are being pulling from old systems that are not accurate, and by a mistake, these are still visible and in the process of being taken off the web.
So, anything you saw on the user_stats.php page,or profile page, or Deepmeta in 2017 is irrelevant as a royalty bearing transaction.
Any royalties, stats or graphs you see through DeepMeta, 'Profile' tab or iStock links is not valid as royalty bearing transaction and will not reconcile with your royalty statement.
As of of January 1st, and until further notice, the one and only place where you will see transactions that are accurate and royalty bearing is on the monthly royalty statement."

I think it is absolutely not true, what do you think?