2
« on: November 05, 2008, 01:30 »
i have also recently had a batch of 54 photos submitted where 53 of them were rejected to various reason. most of them were accepted on other agency. i can seem to understand why this is so. some of them I did not do any post editing on it all shot were done at iso100 and all exposure were checked. it seem just odd that crestock has such a track record. and the remuneration is really low. i do hope that sounding off here. would make crestock reinspect these issue.
Show Posts
