Show Posts
1
Illustration - General / Fotolia says they are doing fine and how about you, dear contributors?
« on: August 09, 2013, 15:06 »
Dear colleagues,
just wanted to bring to your attention a very interesting dialog that I had with Fotolia the other day.
Some days ago I uploaded a small batch of simple vector designs to Fotolia that has been previously accepted on SS and IS. These 2 big agencies at one time made their requirements more strict, especially IS, but now they have changed their policy and now they do accept simple vector designs that sell real good. Fotolia rejected the whole batch for "Originality & Quality" reason = "Too Simple", what made me write them this Email:
"Hello,
Fotolia has just rejected a small batch of my simple vector illustrations - File ID: 54774***, 54774***, 54774***, 54774***, 54774*** for the reason "Originality & Quality " which must be means "Too simple vectors" in this case.
Also you mentioned: "Image buyers typically require images that have intricate details that they cannot create on their own" - that's not true. My 6 year microstock experience shows different picture - simple designs and design elements are required.
By the way, if you don't know yet, Shutterstock and even iStock (!) have changed their acceptance policy and now accept such simple vectors like these ones.
You may check on SS, for example:
Image ID: 148202***
Image ID: 148223***
Image ID: 148223***
Image ID: 148223***
Image ID: 148223***
Sorry to say that, but I don't think Fotolia can afford such kind of policy. FL doesn't seem to be doing very well.
Please don't do the same mistakes as your competitors did. iStock once pushed this too far and still can't recover. Now they accept everything - simple vectors, simple vectors with text etc., just to motivate people uploading, because at some point they just stopped doing that.
Best Regards,
your contributor since 2006"
And here is the answer I got from their support:
"Hello,
We appreciate your feedback but your perception that Fotolia is not doing well is simply misinformed. In fact we are on track for a record year in sales and we are gaining on our competition. As a result we feel it is best to keep our standards high with vector submissions. We wish you the best at the other agencies but Fotolia standards will not be changing.
Sincerely,
Fotolia employee since 2005"
LOOOOL
So... They wish me the best at the other agencies and kindly inform they are doing fine.
I am happy to hear they are "on track for a record year in sales", but as for me I don't feel like I am on this track myself. My sales on FL decreased dramatically over the past few months.
What about you guys?
Are you doing that well in sales on this website as Fotolia does itself selling your images at a low price?
just wanted to bring to your attention a very interesting dialog that I had with Fotolia the other day.
Some days ago I uploaded a small batch of simple vector designs to Fotolia that has been previously accepted on SS and IS. These 2 big agencies at one time made their requirements more strict, especially IS, but now they have changed their policy and now they do accept simple vector designs that sell real good. Fotolia rejected the whole batch for "Originality & Quality" reason = "Too Simple", what made me write them this Email:
"Hello,
Fotolia has just rejected a small batch of my simple vector illustrations - File ID: 54774***, 54774***, 54774***, 54774***, 54774*** for the reason "Originality & Quality " which must be means "Too simple vectors" in this case.
Also you mentioned: "Image buyers typically require images that have intricate details that they cannot create on their own" - that's not true. My 6 year microstock experience shows different picture - simple designs and design elements are required.
By the way, if you don't know yet, Shutterstock and even iStock (!) have changed their acceptance policy and now accept such simple vectors like these ones.
You may check on SS, for example:
Image ID: 148202***
Image ID: 148223***
Image ID: 148223***
Image ID: 148223***
Image ID: 148223***
Sorry to say that, but I don't think Fotolia can afford such kind of policy. FL doesn't seem to be doing very well.
Please don't do the same mistakes as your competitors did. iStock once pushed this too far and still can't recover. Now they accept everything - simple vectors, simple vectors with text etc., just to motivate people uploading, because at some point they just stopped doing that.
Best Regards,
your contributor since 2006"
And here is the answer I got from their support:
"Hello,
We appreciate your feedback but your perception that Fotolia is not doing well is simply misinformed. In fact we are on track for a record year in sales and we are gaining on our competition. As a result we feel it is best to keep our standards high with vector submissions. We wish you the best at the other agencies but Fotolia standards will not be changing.
Sincerely,
Fotolia employee since 2005"
LOOOOL
So... They wish me the best at the other agencies and kindly inform they are doing fine.
I am happy to hear they are "on track for a record year in sales", but as for me I don't feel like I am on this track myself. My sales on FL decreased dramatically over the past few months.
What about you guys?
Are you doing that well in sales on this website as Fotolia does itself selling your images at a low price?
