Show Posts
1
Adobe Stock / AI Images Without Labeling: Deception and Copyright Issues
« on: January 07, 2025, 09:26 »
Hi everyone,
I've noticed more and more artists not labeling their works as AI-generated, even though all elements were created using Artificial Intelligence. Often, it's enough to layer these elements in Photoshop and make minimal edits to present the work as "original" and copyright-protected. Adobe seems to accept this practice as well.
The problems:
Deception: Viewers believe the art was created traditionally.
Copyright gray area: At what point is a work truly original?
Displacement of traditional art: Hybrid works could push non-AI artists to the sidelines.
Style theft and legal risks: AI can generate elements in my (or someone elses) artistic style. If I later produce content that resembles the AI-generated work, I could face copyright infringement claimseven if the style was originally mine.
Should there be a requirement to label AI-generated content? Whats your take on this?
I've noticed more and more artists not labeling their works as AI-generated, even though all elements were created using Artificial Intelligence. Often, it's enough to layer these elements in Photoshop and make minimal edits to present the work as "original" and copyright-protected. Adobe seems to accept this practice as well.
The problems:
Deception: Viewers believe the art was created traditionally.
Copyright gray area: At what point is a work truly original?
Displacement of traditional art: Hybrid works could push non-AI artists to the sidelines.
Style theft and legal risks: AI can generate elements in my (or someone elses) artistic style. If I later produce content that resembles the AI-generated work, I could face copyright infringement claimseven if the style was originally mine.
Should there be a requirement to label AI-generated content? Whats your take on this?
