I was just randomly scrolling trough a video collection and in a newly uploaded files bumped on to this ?

https://stock.adobe.com/ee/video/cycling-woman-bicycle-young-woman-in-red-leggings-and-white-hoodie-riding-a-bike-on-a-sunny-park-path-for-a-healthy-fitness-lifestyle/2018620756

At first I was laughing but then started to think about - where this industry goes if this kind of cheap pornography attempt and "only fans" kind of content ends up in a stock collection ?
Where Adobe as one of a  leading agencies in this industry going with accepting this ? Was it just just a random acceptance ?
NO. That portfolio is also full of same cheap content such as this :

https://stock.adobe.com/ee/video/cycling-coast-woman-rides-a-bicycle-along-a-scenic-seaside-path-on-a-sunny-day-for-fitness-and-leisure/2017742661
or
https://stock.adobe.com/ee/video/woman-bikini-sea-standing-in-clear-ocean-water-on-a-summer-vacation-day-vertical-video/1980800041   

It seems that Adobe deliberately accepts this kind of material and it makes me sick.
P.S.
Not to mention that their own rules of submittin content don't allow this kind of sexualized material.   

Insider info : Adobe is facing a huge dropdown number of uploads in safe and professionals vector queues ( adobe created those two moderation categories for contributors with big sales and high acceptance rates ).
It seems that "organic" vector creators are sick of watching how vector collection is drowned by ai garbage accepted without being marked as Ai.
Also it has to have an effect on sales which are dropping down for sure.

My opinion, as vector contributor is that there are two reasons for this :

1) Lot of those - looking for easy money Ai garbage "creators" - are from third world countries and they simply lack a knowledge of English language so they can't even read where to submit their content or can't understand that they MUST mark it as Ai. Simply, they can't read it and don't understand what they should do.

2) Adobe moderators are not capable of seeing the difference between ai  "vector" and a real one. With photos differences are obvious but in case of vectors, moderators should be experienced vector creators which we all know that they are NOT. 
( insider info 2 - adobe instructed them that they should NOT mark vector as ai or to refuse them because they are not marked as Ai, in case they suspect that it isn't organic if they are not 100% sure that it is ai    ) 

Considering all that I'm thinking about to stop upload my vectors to Adobe and try iStock exclusive ( they still not accepting ai garbage and their collection is still not infected with it )

20+ days to review / moderate "organic" illustration while Ai s**t is added in a collection on a daily basis by tens of thousands.
Adobe definitely decide to spit on creative people in every possible way.   

Recently I found that lot of my assets in portfolio have keyword - datum - which I am 100% sure that wasn't added by me and doesn't have anything to do with asset content in a way to be added as descriptive keyword.
So it must have been added by adobe bot or something like that.

Anyone else ?

I am appalled to see how much AI vectors are accepted in vector collection without being flagged as such.
Also that trend is repeated on a daily basis.
It is obvious that "moderation team" have ZERO knowledge about vectors and ZERO skills to recognize differences between organic vectors and AI garbage.

Or maybe it is far worse - that Adobe just simply DOESN'T CARE how this effects contributors.


for example :
1 ) https://stock.adobe.com/contributor/212993259/sreeporeshchandra?load_type=author

    >  https://stock.adobe.com/images/construction-vehicle-outline-icon-set-heavy-machinery-equipment-collection-for-building-engineering-roadwork-mining-projects-vector-illustration/1894395389       <---- those mistakes are more than obviously AI generated     


2) https://stock.adobe.com/contributor/212895955/ahmad

    >  https://stock.adobe.com/images/vintage-hand-drawn-illustration-of-a-coffee-cup-with-beans-on-a-saucer-retro-sketch-style-graphic-for-a-cafe-menu-or-logo-design/1751706929    <----- that text screaming that this is AI

And of course......many more portfolios with examples like this to be added to a dissapointment in Adobe review / moderating proces. 

My first reaction when I bumped on this was : WHAAAAAAT ?

And I guess that this would be funny if it isn't so tragic. 

I feel need to share this with all people that are creative hard working stock content creators which are faced with multiple unexplained rejections recently.
Well well....While you/we work hard Adobe accepts this kind of content with both hands :

https://stock.adobe.com/ee/images/a-person-holding-a-colorful-handmade-sign-reading-merry-christmas/1848828545

This whole portfolio is full of such "creative" s**t.  --> 

https://stock.adobe.com/ee/contributor/210134730/rokonuzzamnan?load_type=author&prev_url=detail

It is a disgrace what are Adobe moderation and acceptance standards nowadays.   

P.S.  Of course that usage of F.C. Real Madrid logo, Adidas logo and emirates airlines logo is violation of a intellectual property but hey....not for all of us. It is obviously that this guy have more protection from Adobe than pandas in China.   

Strange long time for a vector approval.....  for 8 day not a single file is reviewed 

Since yesterday - video upload doesn't working.
Vectors and illustrations upload work just fine so it is not "upload limit" 

Anybody else ?

Drag and drop upload not working for me.
Anyone else ?

Hello....
Upload / submit still doesn't work for about 8 days.
I cleared cache and cookies...tried diferent browsers ( chrome, safari, mozzila ) but nothing. Tried different provider and different pc too....Upload doesn't work.
Only thing that is changing is ammount of " Not yet submitted " on main contributor page after I try to upload / reupload .
When I click on that it redirect me to a page with three meercats and message:
" Something's amiss ! We can't find what you looking for right now. "

Worst part of this situation is that there is no response from SS contributor support ....and that is so disappointing...

Does anyone have same problems or any suggestion, solution ?