MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Konstantin Sutyagin

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7
101
I'm a happy camper :)

102
Adobe Stock / Re: Big drop in Fotolia sales, only me?
« on: June 26, 2009, 18:04 »
I can offer a theory from the perspective of a user.  First I'm not surprised, and I'm sorry you have seen a drop in sales.  As you may know, Fotolia requires users to purchase credits for $1 each, but a minimum of 10 credits must be purchased each time.  Then, they keep any unused money once their timeframe for usage has lapsed.  In New York, retailers tried to pull this stunt by voiding gift cards, and the legislators put a stop to it.  It is theft, plain and simple.  Unless a user knows s/he will use all 10 of those credits, they are victims of this fraud.  Any business that uses this type of policy to fill a hole in their revenue should suffer in sales, and reputation.  Perhaps others got wise to their nonsense and went elsewhere for their image needs.  I hope you find a competitor who can provide you with the sales you hope for.  Best of luck.  I'm off Fotolia, and telling my colleagues to do the same!

istock credits expire too

103
Computer Hardware / Re: Got external 1.5TB Seagate drive
« on: June 22, 2009, 18:53 »
These drives don't have good reviews. Hight failure rates...

So which one do you recommend Konstatin?

I did some research and so far 1TB Western Digital Green Series seems like one of the most reliable high capacity hard drives.

104
Computer Hardware / Re: Got external 1.5TB Seagate drive
« on: June 22, 2009, 17:52 »
These drives don't have good reviews. Hight failure rates...

105
Continuing decreasing our commissions using any way possible, but utilizing better communication. Friendly re-branding of the same thing. More like istock.

106
Brilliant  ;D

107
Achilles just wrote me, that they had a discussion and decided to approve the rejected flame photo. DT is the best, I knew it :)

108
Just got another photo of fire flames rejected with the reason "We are looking for images that exceed the technical quality and creativity of the images already online. Thank you"
I have many photos of flames and I have not been able to get any of them accepted recently. It feels like there is a brick wall now built for this type of shots. The funny thing is all my recently rejected fire photos were shot with brand new Canon 5d Mark II in 21Mp quality. Half a year ago a lot of similar photos from me was accepted without a single problem. And those accepted were shot on an older 5D in 12Mp. Go figure.

109
Veer / Re: Veer Marketplace Opens for Submissions!
« on: June 08, 2009, 17:30 »
The site is a pure pleasure to work with. I love the interface and attention to detail. Is it possible to send you DVD with a couple of thousands photos instead of uploading them all via FTP?

110
Adobe Stock / Re: FT rank
« on: June 05, 2009, 00:42 »
Overall rank   214
7 days rank   85

111
Yes!!!!!!!!!!

112
7 keywords used to be relevant before, not anymore.

Did Fotolia customer service confirmed that too?

113
Adobe Stock / Re: FT rank
« on: May 09, 2009, 23:34 »
Overall rank   223
7 days rank   84

114
General Stock Discussion / Re: Copyright protection of photos
« on: April 27, 2009, 06:06 »
The problem is how do we register a collection of thousands of already published photos if we didn't register them continuously every three months?

116
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia, new prices, the math.
« on: April 10, 2009, 05:04 »
Of course it is not the case now. I'm talking about future scenarios. I would not want the worst paying agency to succeed.

117
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia, new prices, the math.
« on: April 10, 2009, 03:15 »
...My RPD went down last month but earnings were at an all time high, if that was a result of the money we got deducted being used for extra advertising then I'm all for it.  I've said before that what is important to me is the total earnings at the end of the month not how  the calculation is made to get it.

Would you still be happy if say one agency almost monopolize the microstock business as a result of constantly lowering commissions and aggressive marketing? Do you think they will increase commissions once they have the whole market to themselves, or lower them again since there is no competition left?  ;D

118
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia, new prices, the math.
« on: April 09, 2009, 15:45 »
I believe that Fotolia keeps somewhere between 60 and 70% of each transaction. According to you Fred, I am supposed count myself lucky that they don't keep more. In the past few months Fotolia has devised two sneaky methods to retain more of  OUR earnings. The first was increasing the number of downloads to attain the various ratings and the other was an increase the price of OUR images but decrease the commissions. Now in this thread, people are posting their experience with earnings since the inception of the second claw back method. If Fotolia can't advertise with huge commission they already retain then maybe they should go under. However I think it is just a matter of greed.

Peter


And don't forget that they took away the referral program without letting us know so we would keep all of our FT banners on our websites.

And that's not all.
1 fotolia credit in Europe costs 1 Euro. But most of us, submitters, have 1 fotolia credit value set to $1 USD. So when European customers spends 1 credit on a photo Fotolia gets 1 Euro = $1.31 USD and I get 34 US cents. That makes the actual comission from all European sales about 26%.

119
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia, new prices, the math.
« on: April 09, 2009, 05:02 »
I just did a comparison between my March and February numbers
February - 0.89c per download
March - 0.87c per download
How's that for "price increase"  :'(

120
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock 2009 raise.
« on: March 24, 2009, 21:08 »
I've also thought about this recently and decided that most probably there will be no raise this year.

121
Adobe Stock / Re: FT rank
« on: March 22, 2009, 22:04 »
Overall rank   240
7 days rank   93

122
Adobe Stock / Re: FT rank
« on: March 22, 2009, 02:16 »
Overall rank   240
7 days rank   100

123
General - Top Sites / Re: The most unsatisfying site?
« on: March 21, 2009, 18:34 »
D'oh!  ::) Thanks for noticing, guys! I forgot to include StockXpert in the poll, it's in there now. Although now the poll has 7 sites :)

124
Alamy.com / Re: Alamy Subs
« on: March 20, 2009, 04:17 »
I have a great deal of respect for Alamy. The way they handle such situations should be an example for some other companies. Like Fotolia which comes to mind as an opposite example of how not to deal with submitters.

125
General - Top Sites / The most unsatisfying site?
« on: March 19, 2009, 23:31 »
Sort of like an Anti-Oscar award  ::)
Any of the Big 6 sites make you unhappy? Consider the overall experience of being a contributor, not the mere financial return.
You can vote for two choices. You can change votes.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors