1026
iStockPhoto.com / Re: The Graph Say It All - sales vs $
« on: August 09, 2013, 11:10 »
Yikes, July looks ugly. Hopefully, that was an aberration and not the new normal.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 1026
iStockPhoto.com / Re: The Graph Say It All - sales vs $« on: August 09, 2013, 11:10 »
Yikes, July looks ugly. Hopefully, that was an aberration and not the new normal.
1027
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock Q2 Profit Rises« on: August 08, 2013, 13:38 »The best way to derive your own average royalty rate at Shutterstock is still to take your own received RPD for Q2 and divide it by the published number of revenue per download ($2,33 in Q2). Makes sense. It's interesting that that numbers seems to have leveled off. I wonder if that is where it will stay? 1028
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock Q2 Profit Rises« on: August 08, 2013, 12:31 »Historically, information gleaned from these reports has lead to rough estimates of high 20% to low 30% pay to contributors. I highly doubt that it has been cut in half in the last 3 months, so this 14% number floating around has to be wrong.That's what I thought but it looks very clear that the number is correct, I would appreciate it if you could find where the error is though if there is one. I did expect this report to show a lower royalty rate because of Bigstock going to a subs model but I don't think that alone would explain the drop. Like I said above, Cost of revenue ($21,768,000) seems the more likely candidate for what they payout, but that number may not all go to contributors. I assume affiliates and other things are in there too. 1029
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock Q2 Profit Rises« on: August 08, 2013, 12:07 »Contributor royalties payable 8,142 I'm not sure what that means, but I don't think that is the right spot. Those total liabilities add up to more than the revenue. 1030
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock Q2 Profit Rises« on: August 08, 2013, 12:00 »So I guess since no one corrected me earlier, Shutterstock is paying out an average of 14.2% in royalties. That sounds like the lowest around AFAIK and wasn't it just a couple months ago Jon Oringer was saying they payout 30%? Hmm... this may not be right either. It looks like the cost of revenue at the bottom is more (21 million). I don't think all of that goes to contributors, but the majority of that does. These tea leaves are too hard to read. 1031
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock Q2 Profit Rises« on: August 08, 2013, 11:54 »So I guess since no one corrected me earlier, Shutterstock is paying out an average of 14.2% in royalties. That sounds like the lowest around AFAIK and wasn't it just a couple months ago Jon Oringer was saying they payout 30%? I think the $110 one is the payout not the $7 one. Both of them say they are in thousands not millions. That still seems a bit low (20%). I'm not sure though. 1032
Off Topic / Re: $425 Million Power Ball« on: August 08, 2013, 11:05 »I'm going to sign a presidential decree taking your lottery winnings away. Good luck with that presidency thing. That sounds like a lot more work/money than wasting a couple bucks on a foolish dream of winning the lottery. ![]() 1033
New Sites - General / Re: GraphicStock.com?« on: August 08, 2013, 09:14 »Has anybody received an offer from them? I negotiated with them earlier this year. It was a very generous offer, but in the end I decided not to accept it. I wasn't sure if I wanted to help launch an unlimited subs program. I'm probably dumb for not accepting it, but the whole thing scared me a little because it would seem to undo a lot of the work I did over the last few years. 1034
General Stock Discussion / Re: RPI is it by month or year and whats average« on: August 07, 2013, 16:38 »Imagine you submit 1000 images to two agencies one accepts all of them the the other only 10. Umm... The train gets to Cleveland at 4:00. Dang it! I was never good at these word problems. 1035
Bigstock.com / Re: to remove photos marks them as declined« on: August 06, 2013, 19:45 »
Yeah, I had that happen when I first joined. It took a little time to build my approval back up. Now, I would say don't even bother with Bigstock. They've pretty much become one of the lowest paying sites, and that is saying a lot in a field of low paying sites.
1036
General Stock Discussion / Re: RPI is it by month or year and whats average« on: August 06, 2013, 08:54 »Others here will say that the only number that matters is your earnings. True enough... you can't pay your mortgage with RPI. But that kind of attitude is sticking one's head in the sand. Since I've switched to a smaller agency/fewer downloads approach, my numbers can really fluctuate from month to month wildly. It's a lot less now about what I do and more about how the agencies do or if a big customer comes in that month. I still track RPI, but there is very little that is informative about it anymore. 1037
General Stock Discussion / Re: RPI is it by month or year and whats average« on: August 05, 2013, 10:57 »
People have varying methods depending on what they are using RPI for. I just use it as a guideline to predict what I'll make with x number of images at a particular agency, but others use it to determine success of a particular shoot.
1038
General Stock Discussion / Re: Huffpost -- does google now sell stockphotos?« on: August 03, 2013, 10:51 »
How does crediting Google make any sense in anybody's mind? That's like quoting Facebook for things individuals say on Facebook.
1040
Selling Stock Direct / Re: MyStockVectors Has 20,000 Images« on: August 02, 2013, 13:01 »
Thanks.
![]() 1041
Selling Stock Direct / Re: MyStockVectors Has 20,000 Images« on: August 02, 2013, 12:52 »
I guess this died on impact. At least nobody yelled at me for 20+ pages like Yuri's last self-promotion thread.
![]() 1042
Symbiostock - General / Re: Is Facebook a must regarding promotion of my Symbiostock site?« on: August 02, 2013, 12:49 »
I don't really think any of it is really necessary, but people do like to follow it. So, I think it's good to have it as an option. You could just set it up and link your Twitter to it, so it mirrors your Twitter posts or vice versa. That's how I have my Twitter set up, so it mirrors my Facebook posts.
1043
Symbiostock - Hosting / Re: Bluehost site down way too often« on: August 02, 2013, 12:41 »Which file are you talking about, the MySQL database file? It was just a blog (not Symbiostock). I think I just used the Tools > Export on the Wordpress Dashboard. I think I copied the MySQL database too, but I don't think I ended up using that. Then, just copied my image folders and themes. I don't remember all the details, but it wasn't too complicated. I'd recommend testing it out locally first though. 1044
Symbiostock - Hosting / Re: Bluehost site down way too often« on: August 02, 2013, 12:23 »
I copied my Wordpress site and used a plugin called WordPress Importer to install the exported file. I think you still need to copy over all the images and some other things. If you have a local host MAMP or LAMP, you can probably experiment. The local host probably is a good idea for Wordpress upgrade testing too. 1045
Selling Stock Direct / MyStockVectors Has 20,000 Images« on: August 02, 2013, 08:15 »
This is just a self-congratulatory thread, but I'm happy that I hit my image goal for the year. 20,000 images! Woo hoo!
Alright, my shameless promotion has ended (for now). 1046
General - Top Sites / Re: In terms of revenue is Shutterstock now a bigger agency than Istock?« on: August 01, 2013, 15:18 »In 2011 Istock licensed more than 21 million files... If this is true, then you probably don't need all the other numbers. If SS made 120 million dollars in 2011, then iStock would only have to sell those 21 million files for $6 a piece. I assume their average sale is higher than that. Things probably changed in 2012 & 2013, but that seems like a large gap to make up. 1047
General - Top Sites / Re: In terms of revenue is Shutterstock now a bigger agency than Istock?« on: August 01, 2013, 14:01 »
What are we measuring this on? Overall revenue or net profit?
1048
Selling Stock Direct / Re: Finding and connecting direct private buyers.« on: August 01, 2013, 13:48 »
You've eliminated a lot of options, so it may be a tough road. I've tried the cold calls with very little success. Agents usually want to deal with artists with existing clients or reputations. Most of my contacts come in from walk-ins (since I have a large web presence). That can take time to build though. I wish there was an easier answer, but it's tough out there. If you find a better way, please let me know.
1049
General Stock Discussion / Re: July Earnings« on: August 01, 2013, 11:41 »
Is a loud fart noise descriptive enough for July earnings?
1050
General Stock Discussion / Re: shutterstock« on: July 31, 2013, 15:07 »curious that you saying so when you defend iStock like there isn't other agency in this industry, whatever they do you seem to find always the positive side, so why can't other enjoy SS? I think that is the thing. Not that we don't get good and bad news that deserves extreme reactions, but when posts are overly positive or overly negative they start to lose a little validity. |
|