|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Sean Locke Photography
Pages: 1 ... 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 50 ... 314
1101
« on: January 09, 2017, 10:21 »
Can you give me some advices on my portfolio: what is good and sellable and what isn't?
Well, you should know what is saleable, because it will be selling. Most of what I see is walk around snapshots. You're just not going to get a lot of movement on those.
1102
« on: January 09, 2017, 06:56 »
So my goal is this: Work as hard as i can, creating 'quality' contents in several agencies for like 2 years. I mean it! Two years full of sweat.
Apparently you think "quality contents" is taking other people's work and claiming it as your own.
1103
« on: January 08, 2017, 16:46 »
Well, until they sell one, they're just displaying it online, which is certainly allowed.
1104
« on: January 08, 2017, 12:45 »
Chipotle and possibly the photographer are obviously in the wrong here, but the image apparently was not used in a defamatory way so I don't think she has grounds for much of a suit, other than to have them stop using the image.
That's the entire point of using a release. You're not allowed to just use any image you like of a non-released person for promotional usage until you get caught and then you just have to stop. http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/using-name-or-likeness-another
1105
« on: January 08, 2017, 11:55 »
It just seems like a fairly unremarkable, while attractive, image of a road. When I upload that to google image search and look at similar images, I can scroll and scroll, and scroll, and not find an end to images similar to it. I would expect an RM image to be at least slightly unique, or hard to acquire or have considerable expense put into it.
1106
« on: January 07, 2017, 16:08 »
Should this be RF? I don't think so! 
Sure, I'd say RF. Or were you kidding?
1107
« on: January 05, 2017, 06:56 »
So, to review, all sites' sorting algorithms are different. Got it.
1108
« on: January 04, 2017, 09:16 »
I wish SS used the title field instead of the description field. 123 as well.
1109
« on: January 03, 2017, 10:41 »
that is what all stock media sites are going to use in their search algorithms, and there is no secret recipe.
Well, that was all conjecture. Lol.
1110
« on: January 02, 2017, 21:19 »
Please stop.
1111
« on: January 02, 2017, 19:56 »
Please cut it out. It's quite annoying. This and the silly video thread makes me think you're just trolling us.
1112
« on: January 02, 2017, 09:24 »
There will be no quality difference in bright sunlight between cameras as lots of light allows for optimal performance.
Again, try defining the problem you think you're having.
1113
« on: December 31, 2016, 07:37 »
While you may hold the copyright on a derivative work using public domain content or licensed content, merely uploading unmodified work would violate the question "do you hold the copyright to this image".
1114
« on: December 29, 2016, 11:47 »
That was an interesting read. I still haven't heard back from my initial application to Stocksy and haven't bothered trying again.
Applications do take a while to go through, since the editors will contact and research people they are interested in, but after a while, you should have heard either way. How long has it been?
1115
« on: December 29, 2016, 11:46 »
Just give them the images to use. It's not a big deal. I trade all the time for access.
1116
« on: December 28, 2016, 06:07 »
1117
« on: December 28, 2016, 05:49 »
stock agencies are incorrect, it is perfectly legal to photograph the Hollywood Sign and resell it for profit.
Here, go ahead and ask these guys about that: http://globalicons.com/hollywood-licensing
1118
« on: December 28, 2016, 05:44 »
I have learned that low ISO is best for bright sunlight.
what about gain, do I need a low gain level?
I would suggest taking a class on the basics of photography and using your existing camera. Who is "dtiberio" ?
1119
« on: December 27, 2016, 16:38 »
I see so much wrong with your argument...
They like to pull up old threads to post incorrect or irrelevant information. I don't know why.
1120
« on: December 27, 2016, 15:11 »
1121
« on: December 26, 2016, 16:34 »
You don't need any more than what's on the right.
1123
« on: December 16, 2016, 15:17 »
I rename all my files with my initials, the subject, the date, and the frame number. That way, if I need to figure out what image I'm dealing with on a site, it makes sense. If the client gets the file named that, it makes sense to them too. And I never use spaces in filenames. You don't know what havoc that will wreak.
slp_christmasTree_1216216_0022.jpg
1124
« on: December 14, 2016, 17:18 »
I'm impressed by your numbers, but honestly, I wouldn't put up all those nudes and soft porn. You're just asking for trouble.
1125
« on: December 14, 2016, 06:38 »
It also depends if you area can legally support the co-op model. As there are lots of rules and legalities that Stocksy has to follow. It isn't just a bunch of people getting together. It provides safeguards.
Pages: 1 ... 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 50 ... 314
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
