126
New Sites - General / Re: 500px - distribution partners email
« on: September 29, 2016, 10:37 »
I got one for 52 Cent today... 
Glad to see they are not all priced that low.

Glad to see they are not all priced that low.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 126
New Sites - General / Re: 500px - distribution partners email« on: September 29, 2016, 10:37 »
I got one for 52 Cent today...
![]() Glad to see they are not all priced that low. 127
Alamy.com / Re: 2986 View but No Sales« on: September 26, 2016, 13:24 »... I've received 2986 views - 6 zoom but never got any sale ... That means your images appeared 2986x in search results but only 6x customers actually clicked on one of your images... so its really only 6 "views"... 128
MicrostockSubmitter / Re: Updates« on: September 22, 2016, 10:43 »
Hi Niakris,
what is "microstock.plus"? 129
Deutsche Diskussion / Re: Deutsche Microstock Agenturen« on: August 29, 2016, 13:18 »Sind deutsche Firmen berhaupt auf der Microstockgroup Liste aufgefhrt? Zoonar, Panthermedia, Indivstock Welche deutschsprachige Firma verkauft am besten? Fotolia ;-) 130
GLStock / Re: GL News« on: August 17, 2016, 02:12 »To update your portfolio pricing, when logged in please go to the dashboard --> Account --> Seller Preferences. That doesnt seem to be working though. I changed the "Portfolio Price" yesterday but the prices of my existing portfolio still has the old price. (As far as I remember it never worked.) 131
123RF / Re: Someone elses images in portfolio?« on: July 27, 2016, 06:00 »
Well, did anyone of you wright to their support?
133
Software / Re: Lightroom preset for trendy washed out look?« on: June 24, 2016, 03:14 »So I'm seeing more and more posts beginning with "so". Rather than just poke fun at this practice, I'd like to know what it really adds. Is it emphasis or informality? Or does it imply that a question will follow? I'm not getting it. If I take that word away, nothing about the post seems different. So Im seeing more and more posts being completely off topic... ![]() 134
PhotoDune / Re: PhotoDune $10 transaction fee to get our money?« on: June 17, 2016, 01:51 »
My last payment was in May and there was notransaction fee.
135
General Stock Discussion / Re: What is your top 5 agencies in regard to earnings« on: May 22, 2016, 12:30 »Plot twist, he has stake in these agencies. And by screwing over the contributors they've made him/her rich1. Yay ![]() 136
General Stock Discussion / Re: What is your top 5 agencies in regard to earnings« on: May 22, 2016, 08:53 »1. Yay Oh, I forgot the ![]() 137
General Stock Discussion / Re: What is your top 5 agencies in regard to earnings« on: May 19, 2016, 15:36 »
1. Yay
2. Mostphotos 3. Cutcaster 4. Stockfresh 5. Kozzi 138
New Sites - General / Re: any recent sales at 500px?« on: May 16, 2016, 03:39 »I sold my very first photo today and it was the first photo I have uploaded. I am over the moon. It was bought in XL and I got 0.25 for it. I have only 4 images on that website at the moment. I still can't believe I sold a photo. Just had to share that with you. Are you sure youre talking about 500px? 139
General Stock Discussion / Re: Alamy second to Shutterstock in the Poll?...Explain that...« on: May 14, 2016, 03:07 »
Problem is, most MSG members dont understand the poll results...
All the agencies without a number next to them are NOT necessarily low earners - they just didnt receive the required 50 votes. You can mouse-over to see the voting results for them. So Alamy was never actually "way down" on the list - it simply wasnt ON the list (due to insufficient number of votes). And the "Earnings Rating" is neither $ nor %. (100 = 500$/month) 140
New Sites - General / any recent sales at 500px?« on: May 13, 2016, 07:48 »
Did anybody have recent sales at 500px?
I used to have one or two sales per month until February but not a single one after that... 141
Newbie Discussion / Re: Are the Low Earners worth uploading to?« on: April 30, 2016, 06:31 »Does anybody know an FTP uploader that let's me add keywords and description to an image? I was accepted by iStock today. I will see how it goes and maybe just work for them. I can't do that to copy and paste everything to 5 agencies. You can use Stocksubmitter http://stocksubmitter.com/. You keyword your images once (you can also attach model releases and choose categories). You click upload once -and the program uploads and submits(!) the images to all the agencies you set up. No need to visit the agency websites at all. It works with most agencies (including iStock and Alamy). Upload is always free. Submitting is free for 33 files per month. You can buy more submits if you need them. If you sign up, it would be nice to give [email protected] as your referrer email. 142
General Stock Discussion / Re: ClipDealer ... dead?« on: April 29, 2016, 02:27 »
Who are the other agencies where you found your clips under a different name?
Id like to check if that goes for my images as well. 143
Newbie Discussion / Re: New eBook: How to get started with Stock Photography« on: April 03, 2016, 01:41 »
Then it should be free for MSG members, shouldnt it? 144
Mobile Stock Photogrpahy - General Discussion / Re: Eyeem does not import meta from IPTC on upload? Really?« on: March 28, 2016, 05:45 »
No FTP, no IPTC, no watermark.
145
Veer / Re: Veer closing« on: March 24, 2016, 01:14 »
Has anybody actually received a payment in March who was below the $100 threshold?
147
Adobe Stock / Re: Is FT still "on fire" for you and how does the new content sell?« on: February 15, 2016, 02:44 »The first rule of the boycott list isAll Good here and BTW, a large upswing at DP is showing.Depositphotos? I thought they were on the boycott list FT got a lot of hate as well... Almost every agency got a lot of hate from the group at some stage. This has become avery negative group. Always makes me wonder why people bother with microstock at all if they hate it that much... _______________________________ FT is doing well by the way. I am not seeing a huge rise but clearly an upward trend. 148
General Stock Discussion / Re: 500px beside microstock ?« on: January 23, 2016, 01:58 »Yes, you can share your photos and get comments and favs but there is also a marketplace which SELLS the files ... They are NOT previews! They are the images users upload to the community! The marketplace is just an add on because 500px realized the sales potential of the community images. There is no way to upload to the marketplace directly/only. So if the community is not for you, 500px is not for you. Simple as that. 149
General Stock Discussion / Re: 500px beside microstock ?« on: January 22, 2016, 15:13 »Giant previews with a useless corner water mark is why I do not upload to 500px.Me too! I wonder how some photographers can sleep at night knowing their images are just screen captured and stolen so easily. It blows my mind. It blows my mind how certain stock photographers cant get their head around the fact that 500px is - first and foremost - a photo SHARING community. ![]() 150
General Stock Discussion / Re: 500px beside microstock ?« on: January 18, 2016, 06:49 »Thank you very much for your useful replies. No, youre wrong. BUT If you just want to upload microstock(y) images, there is no point of even trying. |
|