MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - increasingdifficulty

Pages: 1 ... 51 52 53 54 55 [56] 57 58 59 60 61 ... 74
1376
I'd heard the minimum wage has gone up, but I had no idea.  :o  I'm going to submit an application at my local McD's ASAP!

I think you also should remember to consider one year at $100 per month, the next maybe $400, year three $800 etc.

It takes a LONG time to produce and upload 39,000 clips my friend.  ;D

1377
PhotoDune / Re: What a "nice" surprise
« on: February 08, 2017, 12:01 »
Or perhaps they realised that their management of PhotoDune has been a total failure, but prefer not to admit it openly by closing it completely.

Well, that is also true, and there is much to improve with search and reviewers. They failed doing the microstock volume way, so now they want to try something else.

That it's not a significant financial loss makes it a lot easier to just shut down and try something else.

1378
PhotoDune / Re: What a "nice" surprise
« on: February 08, 2017, 11:03 »
Well I have a feeling they are going to have hard times ahead. Still reading all the comments under their announcement is quite an entertaintment. ;)

The thing is that PhotoDune is not significant for Envato as a company at all, so they can afford to experiment.

The top author on PhotoDune makes around $1,000 per month. Guess what the top ThemeForest author makes? A whopping $372,000 per month.

ThemeForest is at least 300 times (probably 500-1000) more valuable than PhotoDune. They could shut down PhotoDune today and not blink, but instead they are trying to create something else so they don't compete directly with the other microstock agencies.

1379
No, I meant in the operating system itself. But there is much you can do within After Effects also, it's incredibly advanced:

https://helpx.adobe.com/after-effects/using/automation.html

1380
i completely agree...if the makes 5000 dollar with this stuff really all the world will sign to become ea micro stock contributor don't spread the news...if he makes 1000 dollar is enough

Unless he's making at least $39,000 dollars a month it wouldn't be worth quitting your job at McDonald's.

1381
PhotoDune / Re: What a "nice" surprise
« on: February 07, 2017, 17:57 »
Lol, looks like their CEO will be searching for a new job quite soon. :D

Haha, not likely. PhotoDune was always their worst earner (and 3D), earning practically nothing compared to ThemeForest.

1382
PhotoDune / Re: Anyone unworthy of Photodune yet?
« on: February 07, 2017, 12:52 »
Me too. Among top 50 contributors.

Looks like they fired majority of the contributors.

Well, with the weekly top images only selling 3 times even #10 didn't make much money. Let alone #50...

They're not going to compete with Shutterstock type images.

1383
Just write a script then. On a Mac you can record your workflow. There is absolutely a way to do it in Windows too.

1384
How can you know that the warp stabilizer produced a good result if you export it automatically afterwards? Regardless of the settings you put in before you can't know how it will turn out.

Just wait, and do it manually.

1385
General - Stock Video / Re: Medical images related question
« on: February 06, 2017, 07:25 »
You are right but following this logic we would need property release for every pizza or chair on the set :)

Not at all. The x-ray is a photograph.

Following YOUR logic you could take a picture of any photograph out there and sell as your own.

1386
For each $10k it costs $250 in conversion fees. I think that is expensive. My regular bank takes 1%, or $100. Big difference. It's huge. Bad.

I fully agree. My bank takes 0.5% but I would be happy with 1% or 1.25%.

I really think 2.5% is OK up to a maximum amount though, say $50. It makes sense for small transactions.

 As you say, when you start earning a bit of money you're paying a new camera in conversion fees each year.

1387
Well if you're losing hundreds from the 2.5%, you're gaining thousands from the Euro being 1.05 to the Dollar rather than 1.25... swings and roundabouts!

Not really a relevant comparison... Pricing adjusts over time and if the dollar gets more expensive there might be fewer sales at the same price point as a result.

1388
Off Topic / Re: Stop Complaining
« on: February 05, 2017, 14:05 »
9. People who go annonymous to complain about complaints.

Oh, the irony.

1389
Also I can't speak about Thailand, but I know equipment is a lot cheaper in many other countries than it is in the UK (and at least one where it is, or at least was, much more expensive!). Partly due to taxes, partly because it seems that manufacturers price according to the market.

Well, brand equipment is rarely cheaper than Hong Kong or the US. It's just that there are more knock-offs in certain countries.

That being said, even in so called "poor" countries (which Thailand isn't really), there are plenty of rich people, and plenty of middle-class people able to afford whatever middle-class people in the UK can afford. The countryside is a different story.

1390
I was in Thailand before 3 years, I am sure there arent enough people who can buy nice camera and take good photos. I dont know why they are listed as one of the bigger contributor countries.

Are you kidding? Sure, the average income isn't anywhere close to the UK but to say that 1,823 people can't afford a DSLR is a bit ridiculous. Out of a population of 67 million... 6.3 million in the modern city of Bangkok alone.

1391
Is the population of Andora (79,000) totally comprised of photographers? ...14th in the table They took a relatively small small sample I suspect some kind of bias has crept into it.

If 176 out of 79,000 equals 100% to you, then yes... Naturally, the answer is no.

1392
General - Stock Video / Re: Medical images related question
« on: February 05, 2017, 05:17 »
Wouldn't the creator of those x-ray images have copyright over them?

Precisely. That would be the photographer.

1393
http://www.microstockgroup.com/general-stock-discussion/video-pricing/msg438640/#msg438640


Yes, I read that thread. He doesn't specify what "respectable levels" means there. Now they're priced at $200, but is that what he meant back then in 2015?

Anyway, do you still think it's nice to sell 5 clips per week when you have 39,000 in your portfolio? Even if they were $1,000 each I still think that's pretty bad. If I had 39,000 clips and they kept my current average I'd be looking at property in the Bahamas, Monaco and Malibu right now.

A more reasonable number would be at least 1% of your portfolio per month, or let's say even 0.5%. It's a long way up to 195...

1394
Who can say something is too cheap or too expensive if it sells..

Well, 5 times $200 or 20 times $100? Or 100 times $50? Which would you prefer?

Those are also for specific use and even if there were priced for nothing, they would maybe not sell more. Actually there was a topic on this forum and if I remember well, it was actually this guy who created it and asked what was the value of his portfolio and what prices he should sell. He was selling for cheap and we advised him to at least give a try to raise his prices. He did try for few months and not only his sales didn't fall, it actually grew.

Of course there is no way of knowing with 100% security unless we study parallel universes with different pricing.

It's all about experimenting to find where you sacrifice the least sales with the highest return. If you think 4-5 sales per week on a portfolio of 39,000 is good, I will let you do that.

To me, that sounds incredibly, absurdly low, which means that a lowering of prices to, say $99, might have a positive effect on revenue.

Naturally, the subject matter might not have a demand of more than 5 sales per week, no matter the price, in which case they could be raised to $400 and still get 5 sales.

In my experience, however, I find that pricing just above average for clips that are regularly usable results in the biggest revenue. That communicates quality while not scaring away buyers.

For absolutely unique clips like stepping down into a volcano, naturally, the price could be higher.

I used to price 2-3 times the average price and I got sales pretty much every day. Now I price around average up to 1.5x average and I make 3 times more money. So that works out better for me at least.

1395
Well, it depends on how much of a perfectionist you are.

I ALWAYS have to adjust filters/settings and stabilization for each clip, so automating it simply would not work. Every clip is different and if you want to maximize output quality, automation is not the way to go.

1396
General - Top Sites / Re: Fotolia no sales
« on: February 03, 2017, 12:36 »
Fotolia is a complete mystery for me, while having daily sales on SS and IS, I maybe have one a month on FT and every second one is 0.18. At least the upload is straightforward enough.
Where are you from I think Fotolia suits the European market more?

Historically that's true, old FT was more European. Now the Adobe buyers are adding graphics and illustration income in addition.

From the first day the lowest ever commission was 25c, now it's higher. Never 18c ever. 99c, $1.65, $1.38, $2.30, $1.84, others.

Well it says 0.18 credits, I assume it's 1 credit = 1$.
When I go to My credits page there is like:
photo sale +0.25
-0.08 Withholding, image sold with subscription
so it's 0.18 give or take.

Maybe Serbia doesn't have any tax treaties with the US but have you checked out the Tax Center and filled out the W-8Ben form?

1397
Also keep in mind that tagging and content is more important than number of clips and often image/production quality too (depends). Editorial content doesn't have to be top quality, it can be shaky 480p with wind noise if it's from the right event/disaster/place, but commercial footage needs to look better.

weathernews with 39,000 clips is in fact now going over all of his clips to fix his bad tagging, he said so himself. So it's better to do it right from the start.

1398
Shutterstock.com / Re: down the toilet
« on: February 03, 2017, 12:17 »
I have 23 for my bestseller, but normal is 4-6.

Naturally, an image with many sales is going to have better search placement for any keyword.

1399
Shutterstock.com / Re: down the toilet
« on: February 03, 2017, 12:05 »
It's 24 words over time, not in a single search.

1400
but i'm a hard worker...if i want i can produce 22000 video in less than a year:) one day in a capital like hong kong or bangkok i really can produce a lot of editorial.

I would call you Superman if you even did 5,000 clips in one year.  ;D

Just think about the upload time alone to 4 agencies.

Average clip: 300 MB (conservative, I have many 1 GB+ clips) times 4 agencies = 1.2 GB per clip.

5,000 clips means 6,000 GB upload. That's 16 GB per day, every day. It's doable on a fast connection of course and if you work every day for 12-14 hours it might be possible to get 5,000 clips up (only HD, if 4k we're talking 4x the size).

22,000 quality clips in one year for one person. I don't think so. With good tagging? Absolutely not.

If you have a team of people (like hotelfoxtrot for example, that's not just 1 person, that's a whole team of uploaders/taggers/planners) it might be doable.

Pages: 1 ... 51 52 53 54 55 [56] 57 58 59 60 61 ... 74

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors