MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - f8
151
« on: February 18, 2022, 15:10 »
6 days, yes that will affect SS very much. Your dozen or so images not being inspected to your demanding standard will break the company.
Take a deep breath, breathe. Chant if you have too, relax.
152
« on: January 09, 2022, 17:20 »
The woke mob, they see racism everywhere.
Up to a point I agree with you, there certainly is a lot of overcompensating going on in the WOKE crowd, but your moderated comment was "textbook racism" (as noted by Zero Talent) and is completely pathetic. I feel sorry for you.
153
« on: January 09, 2022, 12:27 »
Honestly, when were "the arts" ever really a viable career path? 
Great point although before April 1 2019 happened I was making $140k to $160k/year when you added up my P5, SS, and videoblocks revenue, and I've read that others did much better in stock before the agencies cut pay and started doing direct deals with distributors and buyers leaving us with a few one-off sales.
Today though I would 1000% not recommend it, I think it's borderline fraud that the colleges and universities here still sell those programs as viable career opportunities, we have 16-17 year old high school students going to these career fairs and being told this is a great career opportunity.
Music was a career for some but now unless your big enough to tour you're paying to come to work with that you can make off Spotify, it's worse than stock video.
There's no money in it today, anything arts related but maybe it could be a side gig that pays once in awhile but not a job.
There's no money in free.
I just regret so much not getting out when April 1 2019 happened, could have got out debt free too.
First I have serious doubts that you can go from 160k per year to 0 per month overnight. Secondly, where did you spend all the money? Because those are big amounts. You certainly knew, that wont last forever, don't you have any savings?
Videoblocks closed to individual contributors, sales crashed at my #1 which was pond and SS was never that strong, I kept operating full tilt, upgraded equipment and put in a ton of hours, 18 hour days on the road filming and the upload/tag/repeat.
I didn't see April 1 2019 coming, sure nothing lasts forever but I didn't see warning signs until around March 15th when other contributors started saying sales stopped and the it hit me on April 1, keep in mind taxes, expenses and next thing you know I am pulling out the credit cards, I stayed in way to long thinking I could pull off a recovery and now it's not gonna recover, the market has changed too much, barely a hobby that pays now.
It sure was good while it lasted, was looking at the old tax returns for the paperwork I have to prepare and if definitely was good back then.
Sounds like poor cash flow management and no understanding of how to run a business.
Also, blaming immigrants is lame. How is it they come to a new country with zero references and experience and succeed, yet the workaholic 'Canadian' can't find a job? Seriously, if you can't find a job then you are not applying yourself.
You actually come across as self entitled and a victim in all of your rants.
I'll give you that, I should have closed the business and walked away two months after the massive sales drop at pond on April 1 2019 but you always think it's gonna come back, maybe just a "summer slump" as they used to call it.
Not blaming the immigrants from India, they are here legally, but come visit sometime and see who is working and who is in the homeless shelters, once the Indian mangers are in all the black, Asian and white are gone and it's all Indian and I'm not looking for anything high end, Walmart, fast food, light industry, whatever.
I wish you could actually come here and see and then try and get a job here, just some entry level or general labour stuff, you'd be a shocked as I was, a friend of mine who is a black student here is also running into the same problem I am.
I'm actually glad that the story mentioned the elephant in the room, no one hires native Canadians anymore, I'm surprised they mentioned it.
You should visit southern Ontario and see for yourself.
You are presuming I am not from where you are... That is another story. You sound like a typical WOKE Canadian who is upset by anything and everything and blaming everything and anything on everyone else. The race card you are bringing up is really a tiring conversation. I also find it intriguing that you have had employers say "sorry buddy we only hire our nationality". Your conversation is ever changing, consistently weak, and if I was hiring I would not hire you, and yes I am a white Canadian. I am not of Italian heritage so you could use that against me for not hiring you if it makes you feel better.
154
« on: January 09, 2022, 10:03 »
Honestly, when were "the arts" ever really a viable career path? 
Great point although before April 1 2019 happened I was making $140k to $160k/year when you added up my P5, SS, and videoblocks revenue, and I've read that others did much better in stock before the agencies cut pay and started doing direct deals with distributors and buyers leaving us with a few one-off sales.
Today though I would 1000% not recommend it, I think it's borderline fraud that the colleges and universities here still sell those programs as viable career opportunities, we have 16-17 year old high school students going to these career fairs and being told this is a great career opportunity.
Music was a career for some but now unless your big enough to tour you're paying to come to work with that you can make off Spotify, it's worse than stock video.
There's no money in it today, anything arts related but maybe it could be a side gig that pays once in awhile but not a job.
There's no money in free.
I just regret so much not getting out when April 1 2019 happened, could have got out debt free too.
First I have serious doubts that you can go from 160k per year to 0 per month overnight. Secondly, where did you spend all the money? Because those are big amounts. You certainly knew, that wont last forever, don't you have any savings?
Videoblocks closed to individual contributors, sales crashed at my #1 which was pond and SS was never that strong, I kept operating full tilt, upgraded equipment and put in a ton of hours, 18 hour days on the road filming and the upload/tag/repeat.
I didn't see April 1 2019 coming, sure nothing lasts forever but I didn't see warning signs until around March 15th when other contributors started saying sales stopped and the it hit me on April 1, keep in mind taxes, expenses and next thing you know I am pulling out the credit cards, I stayed in way to long thinking I could pull off a recovery and now it's not gonna recover, the market has changed too much, barely a hobby that pays now.
It sure was good while it lasted, was looking at the old tax returns for the paperwork I have to prepare and if definitely was good back then.
Sounds like poor cash flow management and no understanding of how to run a business. Also, blaming immigrants is lame. How is it they come to a new country with zero references and experience and succeed, yet the workaholic 'Canadian' can't find a job? Seriously, if you can't find a job then you are not applying yourself. You actually come across as self entitled and a victim in all of your rants.
155
« on: January 08, 2022, 11:52 »
Honestly, when were "the arts" ever really a viable career path? 
Great point although before April 1 2019 happened I was making $140k to $160k/year when you added up my P5, SS, and videoblocks revenue, and I've read that others did much better in stock before the agencies cut pay and started doing direct deals with distributors and buyers leaving us with a few one-off sales.
Today though I would 1000% not recommend it, I think it's borderline fraud that the colleges and universities here still sell those programs as viable career opportunities, we have 16-17 year old high school students going to these career fairs and being told this is a great career opportunity.
Music was a career for some but now unless your big enough to tour you're paying to come to work with that you can make off Spotify, it's worse than stock video.
There's no money in it today, anything arts related but maybe it could be a side gig that pays once in awhile but not a job.
There's no money in free.
I just regret so much not getting out when April 1 2019 happened, could have got out debt free too.
First I have serious doubts that you can go from 160k per year to 0 per month overnight. Secondly, where did you spend all the money? Because those are big amounts. You certainly knew, that wont last forever, don't you have any savings?
For those of you paying attention... has anyone noticed Level6 goes from 160K per year to filing for bankruptcy? All over the board. I don't think the elevator is going to the top floor.
156
« on: January 04, 2022, 12:54 »
But if that starting level already starts this month based upon your sales of last year is not very clear.
This makes it clear IMO: "the Download total you end the year on determines your starting royalty rate for the next calendar year"
To quote all of your above posts.... please don't forget you are one of only a handful of people on this forum that can read a complete paragraph. I applaud you for being able to read with comprehension. It's such a rarity today.
157
« on: December 22, 2021, 16:26 »
Once upon a time being exclusive at certain agencies was not such a bad deal. These days however I would not be exclusive with any agency.
As noted by Level6 "My attitude with these websites is they aren't loyal to us, I don't believe one word any of them say." I agree with this 100%.
158
« on: December 16, 2021, 14:28 »
a) All of the agencies will continue to leech off the contributors and distract them with carrot dangling techniques to entice corporate profit and keep reducing royalties all the while contributors will take it and complain like there is no tomorrow and put forth empty threats on forums.
Same same.
b) All of the agencies will realize that without their contributors, the very people who produce their content for sale and keeps them in business will finally show their tremendous gratitude, respect, and increase royalties so that 'we' could all profit and once again make this a sustainable industry.
Dreaming.
Wishing you all the very best for 2022.
159
« on: December 03, 2021, 14:52 »
Firstly... Your problems are not because somebody else is a billionaire.
Secondly... Apart from two countries in Africa the rest were colonized and exploited for all they were worth. They are no longer colonized but the abuse continues under neo colonialism.
160
« on: November 30, 2021, 12:08 »
I would start by posting on the Istock forum then they will direct you to the non-existent Shutterstock forum so then you could always try the Adobe Stock forum and if that fails you might want to do the not so obvious.... contact Dreamstime and tell them you want to deactivate your account.
You're welcome.
161
« on: November 22, 2021, 14:01 »
Eliminate the free collection please. This is self serving for Adobe with not one benefit to the artist.
162
« on: November 22, 2021, 13:57 »
Hmmmmm... receiving $5 dollars for giving your work away for free to promote a multi billion dollar corporation... What could possibly go wrong?
Seriously folks... those who participated in this con get what you deserve, and the rest of us pay the price. I look at the free collection and it's a no brainer why sales are down. Why would anyone pay for content that is free?
163
« on: November 19, 2021, 16:37 »
I think with the current choke hold Adobe offers does indeed drive customers away. Affinity is a very nice alternative. I dropped Premiere and now use Davinci and have not looked back.
164
« on: November 19, 2021, 16:08 »
Alternatively you can give Adobe $5 for unlimited use of all apps because they hope to attract you as a future customer to purchase their products.
165
« on: November 14, 2021, 18:47 »
How and when to use ND filters for your drone in three areas: photography, time-lapses or hyper lapses, and video. The aim is to see if and why you should buy them and what kind of ND filters you should get according to different situations https://youtu.be/CoAD8BSF6fQ
Yes. Same rules apply for regular video. No. Not needed for photos. Not sure. I don't know how one would do time-lapse or hyper-lapse from drone unless you shoot jpeg and process, then my guess is you would not need the ND filter.
166
« on: November 14, 2021, 18:41 »
a) read the fine print on anything you sign up for. period. b) review your credit card statement monthly. period. c) follow both a) and b). period. d) stop blaming 'fraud' on your lack of involvement in your own affairs. period.
167
« on: October 27, 2021, 08:19 »
I'd be bloody embarrassed to offer creatives $5 for unlimited free use for one year. And I'd be ashamed to accept it.
168
« on: October 20, 2021, 19:15 »
Something very wonky is going on with the metadata. I upload video and the keywords attached to the image are nothing in relation to my keywords. I double checked when I uploaded and they were fine, a few hours later totally different keywords and not even related to the subject.
169
« on: October 14, 2021, 09:02 »
@MatHayward to be clear, you're saying the only option is to select images and delete one by one? So if I need to delete 5,000 images, I have to do so 1 by 1? Is this what you offer to larger partner agencies too?
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
To be clear??? What part of Mat's answer did you not understand? The N or the O?
170
« on: October 14, 2021, 08:59 »
I must lead an extremely boring life. I did not even know Farcebook was down until I saw it on the news. I can't imagine having this be a going concern and a source of conversation. Just wondering did you all survive?
171
« on: October 03, 2021, 14:31 »
It depends on the customer and of course what he is looking for. If you need to download a clock timelapse rest assured that no client is to look anywhere else if he/she has a subscription at Getty SS Envato Elements p5 or Artgrid, he will surely find plenty of alternatives. But things are quite different if they search for workers in a nuclear plant, diving in a pool or drone shots of rock climbers. He will pay who ever has the video he likes best for the ProJet . It doesn't matter if he is subscribed with any other library.
Myself I was preparing not so long ago my first short film. I needed Latin chants. I was subscribed to 2 audio libraries.: soundstripe and audiio.com. I didn't like or find anything in them so I bought individual music files at Pond5. So unless you do ultra generic stuff in video people will hunt for your files if what you have is different of what other copycat and redo a 1000 times.
Remember that about hose 22 million files at SS most of it is content repeated to death : splashes, clocks, skies, etc. There is a reason that agencies like Artgrid for example are growing even if they arrived very late to the party. The same can be said of agencies like Stocksy or Arcangel in the photo department. They have nothing to fear from SS and the likes. They have different content and SS will not replicate it because 1- It is too expensive to do for the paltry returns (you just need higher payments to be viable). 2- That huge number of files just demonstrates that 99% is of very low quality and searching is a frustrating experience for many clients where time is money.
Again I am almost directing my advice to pros although we are a vanishing breed in stock. For amateurs that produce very simple stuff what you say holds true and a model smiling to a camera with a mask, the fake Covid vaccines,.... it really doesn't matter that content is everywhere. Amateurs what they have to compete is the growing free libraries that slowly have this same simple content and give it away for free.
This is a thought process I can't follow.
Most sales nowadays happen with subscription plans, so why would a customer who has a subscription with one agency even go searching for a video on another agency? I can understand maybe browsing around on sites with free videos or photos first and I can also understand searching somewhere else if you really need a very very specific video of something and can't find it or anything similar to it anywhere else. But if you have to buy the video from another agency where you don't have a subscription, it will cost you an extraordinary higher amount, while on the agency where you have the subscription it would cause no additional costs at all. And with 22 million videos available on Shutterstock, what are the chances that, even if you can't find one specific video there, you will not at least find some suitable substitute for it?
I've been around the block in the world of stock photography, pre-Getty. You are correct is saying that the 'pros are a vanishing breed in stock'. The industry has forced that upon us and it is no longer sustainable to go out and create great work. The expenses of doing so simply can't be recouped at the paltry rates all agencies pay these days. You know when so called 'microstock rock stars' sell their work to Adobe for $5 a pop just to survive that the industry is a sinking ship.
172
« on: August 15, 2021, 14:07 »
Hey Folks,
My equipment is aging but how do I justify buying a new mirrorless dSLR and RF lenses that will set me back about $10,000 plus? Just a few years ago I would upgraded without a thought but today and the future it seems stupid to spend that kind of money.
I will keep my old camera and lenses for now...
. My newer camera is a Canon 60d 18 mp, i bought it about 2012 year. Besides i have a Canon XT 8.0 mp (bought on 2015) and an old Canon 5D 12,8 mp (bought on 2016). I will never buy a camera again. I don't have money for that. I'm selling some photography accessories for buying some food and paying bills. Microstock is not my main income. I would be nice if i have joined to microstock world in the beginning, because this going down hill.
I suspect that most of us "regulars" on this forum will keep shooting with the camera gear we already have, because there's no longer any financial incentive to upgrade.
And the same is probably true with computers and processing software.
I heard a rumour if you give Adobe $5 you will get free software for a year
173
« on: August 13, 2021, 12:49 »
without factual data there is no proof.
That's if you only want to rely on empirical data, without trying to understand the medium/long-term logical consequences of these actions. We can safely predict that the night follows day, without having to wait for the dark. 
Such a large collection of good quality free assets is rather likely to deter buyers from buying more stuff, instead of stimulating them to buy more. That's because nothing beats free, especially when the quality is sufficient for the purpose.
So when your work is offered for free, even if you got your precious $5, you will kill potential sales not necessarily from you, but rather from your fellow contributors who are competing in the same category. In return, their free stuff will kill your sales in other categories, very likely beyond your precious $5.
The bigger this collection becomes, the bigger the losses will be for the contributor's community.
Too bad that many of us are wearing horse blinders, seeing only their narrow and individual short-term interest, instead of seeing how fast we are cutting the branch we all are sitting on!
okay, say you're right. Wouldn't this kill Adobe as well? For Adobe to do the second wave they must have seen their sales (not free) go up as well right?
Adobe is gambling with our (future) money. It's rather likely that they will also be losing money, indeed. Rest assured that other sites will have no option left but to compete against Adobe, offering even more stuff for free, thus hurting Adobe, the same way we are hurting each other at the contributor's level (instead of competing fairly)
The vicious circle will continue, now that Pandora's box is open.
Adobe is not gambling with your future at all. They are a corporation motivated by profit. However any small expendable minion that gives away work for next to nothing is guaranteeing their extinction. I am perplexed why so many are jumping for joy to give their work away for next to nothing to promote a corporation.
174
« on: August 11, 2021, 12:49 »
That was a very large second wave - total in the free section is 574,566 items, 529,156 of which are photos
July 16th, the total was just over 319k
Most of the other asset types stayed nearly the same as in July.
The quality is excellent - putting a Customer hat on I wouldn't see anything different from the main collection.
At the beginning, the stated approach was breadth, not depth, but with such a large free collection, the depth has noticeably increased (based on some test searches I did)
I hesitate to ask, because today's answer might be different in the future, but is there any notion of a maximum size of this collection?
All for $5 Not career building for sure, but great for corporate profit.
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|