151
General Stock Discussion / Re: Poll on freepik [name just speaks for itself]
« on: May 11, 2020, 15:18 »
108% Agreed.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 151
General Stock Discussion / Re: Poll on freepik [name just speaks for itself]« on: May 11, 2020, 15:18 »
108% Agreed.
152
General Stock Discussion / Poll on freepik [name just speaks for itself]« on: May 11, 2020, 11:56 »
My opinion: people should stop uploading there before it's too late.
153
Microstock News / Re: Good news from Shutterstock« on: March 02, 2020, 14:13 »
Ops sorry for dup. Thread can be removed.
154
Microstock News / Good news from Shutterstock« on: March 02, 2020, 07:53 »
Last week, we emailed you about upcoming changes to the way customers can license your work.
To simplify options for our Shutterstock Premier customers, and to expand the visibility of your work, Shutterstock will be removing the Enhanced License and Sensitive Use opt-out component tomorrow, Tuesday, March 3, 2020. No action is required on your part. Starting tomorrow, your content will be licensable by all Shutterstock customers, including those who need Enhanced License usage and who intend to use your content in specific sensitive contexts. Your earnings potential from these premium license types is generally greater than from our Standard Licenses. Enhanced Licenses allow customers to use your content in high-profile projects, such as film and television, incorporation into merchandise for sale, wall art for commercial spaces, and print runs over 500,000. The concept of Sensitive Use only applies to content featuring models. Customers will be able to use your model-released content for certain potentially sensitive purposes, specifically limited to: promotion of tobacco products, implying mental or physical impairment, or use in political contexts. Customers are never permitted to use your content in a way that is defamatory, deceptive, pornographic, libelous, obscene, or illegal. Again, no action is required from you, but if you wish to make specific content on your portfolio unavailable for download, you can delete individual images by using your Catalog Manager. For more information on how customers can use your work, check out the Shutterstock License Agreement. 155
General Stock Discussion / Re: Wirestock news« on: January 10, 2020, 05:31 »
As for me, i've mastered my editing & uploading process, so i don't need such services anymore.
Scripts, and xpiks do the job pretty fast. Simple as that. And it is not a big deal if you uploading to 3-4 stocks. Ss, as, is and super secret one:) 156
Cameras / Lenses / Re: iPhone 11« on: November 24, 2019, 07:06 »I have two Canon 5D4's. I fell and can't lift them so I didn't shoot in over a year. I just bought the Iphone 11pro and this phone camera blows the Canon away! Everything I am shooting is getting accepted. The color right out of the phone for stock is fantastic. It even shoots in the dark without noise!Stop throwing misleads. It looks miserable. It's just overpriced phone with lots of uneeded tech for true photographer. I even bet that iphone11 can't beat Nokia 808 from 2012 in terms of provided resolution. It is not a surprise, because of pathetic 1/2.55" sized sensor. ps. Huawei Mate 30 Pro and Xiaomi Mi Note 10 are more intersting stuff though. 157
Off Topic / Re: iPhone 11 Pro's computational photography« on: November 17, 2019, 09:56 »Maybe it is not so bad in terms of dynamic range. But in terms of pure resolution it is cr#p. DR is yes, pretty bad (no one cancel braketing), but i was speaking about resolution. Huawei P30 Pro is worser about 10%. Looking forward regarding Huawei Mate 30 Pro 1/1.5 and Xiaomi with 1/1.33 sensors. But iphone in terms of resolution is a complete joke. 158
Off Topic / Re: iPhone 11 Pro's computational photography« on: November 15, 2019, 19:49 »
Maybe it is not so bad in terms of dynamic range. But in terms of pure resolution it is cr#p.
1/2.55 size explains all. Nokia 808 with its 1/1.2 still on the top. 159
Shutterstock.com / Re: Zero sales of new files« on: November 13, 2019, 14:26 »Well something is definitely different. I've been uploading photos and already had sales from those batches in all agencies, including the lowest earners, but nothing on SS. It looks like "somebody" accept all and new files instantly drowning in newly uploaded ones. 160
Shutterstock.com / Re: Zero sales of new files« on: November 13, 2019, 13:42 »
Uploaded almost 1500 pictures during last two weeks. One picture was sold:)
New stuff not selling at all. Only old ones. It looks like smth is broken and we are drowning in similars. 161
General Stock Discussion / Re: Finally closed my Canstock account« on: November 01, 2019, 04:11 »I have always felt that I may as well stay with low earners just because my images are already on their sites but yesterday gave up on Canstock. They got tired of inspecting photos after ten or eleven years so started rejecting every photo I uploaded. Very frustrating and at the low sales rate I wont last long enough to receive a payout so I let them keep my 27 dollars. I left them leaving my 10$. For me almost useless site. 162
Shutterstock.com / Re: Did SS new policity on similar content have any impact??« on: October 28, 2019, 12:30 »Not sure i believe that. My older stuff generally sells more than newer. Its fairly common as well for an older image thats never previously sold to suddenly come to life. I am glad that it worked for you! Really! 163
Shutterstock.com / Re: Did SS new policity on similar content have any impact??« on: October 28, 2019, 09:06 »Not sure i believe that. My older stuff generally sells more than newer. Its fairly common as well for an older image thats never previously sold to suddenly come to life. Confirmed. Even newer stuff is better in terms of image quality and design, but sells very badly. 164
iStockPhoto.com / Re: I QUIT iSTOCK« on: October 26, 2019, 00:46 »Was their contributor till 2017 then dropped them. Returned in the end of 2018. I used automatics and scripts to simplify the work. But really this stock not deserves to upload to it. Stay away. 165
iStockPhoto.com / Re: I QUIT iSTOCK« on: October 25, 2019, 14:27 »
Was their contributor till 2017 then dropped them. Returned in the end of 2018.
Currently i get about 40-50$ a month from almost 10.000 files. Pathetic. Stopped uploading 4 month ago. Not going to delete just keep my best stuff for SS and Fotolia. Hope they will collapse in a while. Why? 1. very low royalties 2. atrocious submitting and keywording system 3. too old to change anything 4. they already earned what they want (of course with our help) Value your work! Don't upload to greedy *insult removed*! 166
Software - General / Re: iStock/Getty no longer accepting submissions from Stocksubmitter« on: July 19, 2018, 13:50 »We were working with them for a long while in regards to improve the keywords quality in the submissions coming through StockSubmitter to ESP.Quite obvious that they want people to use their atrocious web-interface or incoherent deepmeta client. Today is my last upload via stocksubmitter, big corporations can't do wise things, bye-bye istock. 167
iStockPhoto.com / iS bans StockSubmitter« on: July 18, 2018, 14:20 »
Deadline: 20th of July.
They want us to use their atrocious web upload and incoherent deepmeta. Planning to drop is uploads. 168
Yaymicro / Re: What kind of images sell on Yay?« on: July 18, 2018, 14:17 »
4 EUR over 5 years. Pretty self-explanatory.
169
Off Topic / Re: Trump in Putin's pocket« on: July 18, 2018, 13:44 »
Low-down-crappy-fake politics on microstock forum? Why?
170
Shutterstock.com / Re: Video sale for $1.50?« on: May 27, 2018, 03:47 »If thats how they want to play it then best not to upload any video to them at all. Predicting that in a couple of years footage will bring to contributor same about of money as photos for now. 171
Cameras / Lenses / Re: do medium format sensors earn more money than full frame?« on: May 21, 2018, 17:11 »I am currently shooting with an APS-C camera. I am going to buy a new camera, full frame or medium format. I have 645D. It is utterly impractical for microstock purposes. Good modern APS will be sufficient. Their payments way too low to buy MF camera for content delivery. I even push pictures from Nokia N808, but heavily processed of course. And not ashamed of it, they totally deserve it. 172
Cameras / Lenses / Re: Pentax 645z opinions?« on: May 21, 2018, 05:55 »
Such equipment almost useless and hard to receive payback considering the royalties of microstock sites.
173
General Stock Discussion / Re: Revolucy« on: April 24, 2018, 03:00 »
Over 3000 images and about half a year there.
0.25 earnings. 5$ in total. Hope you get it? 174
General Stock Discussion / Re: Anyone working SuperStock?« on: April 24, 2018, 02:57 »
I have there over 2000 pictures for about a year.
No reports from them. No web interface contributor. Pathetic. 175
Off Topic / Re: Deleting Facebook« on: April 23, 2018, 04:17 »
I am not using any social network for about 2 years. Waste of time and energy.
Showing your pseudo ego to fake friends? Nah, i'll better study something. |
Submit Your Vote
|