MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Noedelhap
Pages: 1 ... 59 60 61 62 63 [64] 65 66 67 68 69 ... 90
1576
« on: April 24, 2015, 17:03 »
Does anyone have a link to the video, or is it a private exclusive video for exclusives' eyes only?
http://www.istockphoto.com/forum_messages.php?threadid=366573&page=1
Thanks!
Does anyone have a link to the video, or is it a private exclusive video for exclusives' eyes only?
Someone put it here for public consumption on YouTube: http://youtu.be/R12s2Acv_IQ
I posted this link in this thread once already. Guess it wasn't so obvious the first time.
I must have missed it, but thank you too.
1577
« on: April 24, 2015, 15:52 »
Does anyone have a link to the video, or is it a private exclusive video for exclusives' eyes only?
1578
« on: April 24, 2015, 15:30 »
I've made only 9 (yes, NINE) credit sales this month (so far). I don't have a big port, but to put it in perspective: that's the worst performance since July 2011. Coincidence? I think not.
1579
« on: April 23, 2015, 07:36 »
Its hard to believe that 15 years ago, a small team with an idea about changing the world of royalty-free imagery, would evolve into what we know as iStock by Getty Images today. It is indeed hard to believe how iStock has evolved into a big failure. an appetite for disruption, and an irreverent affinity for change. Again, very true. Over the past 12 months, we have we have completely repictured the business, updating and simplifying the search and purchase process, removing barriers at every step. Yeah, such as those annoying sales, away with them! In an industry where our competitors continue to push quantity over quality ....I'm glad iStock has never, ever mass-ingested a library full of old, outdated vector images to push out any new, freshly produced work. and has made iStock by Getty Images the leader in the market. Shutterstock would like his quote back.
1580
« on: April 22, 2015, 13:19 »
Addressing the more recent questions about tax withholdings: this is a bug. We're storing payments correctly, they're just not being displayed properly on your earnings tables. Our developer in charge of this functionality is on a much-needed vacation for a few days, but this should be cleaned up before the end of the week. Sorry for the confusion!
Good to hear. I just noticed the tax amount has been removed and I'll receive the full sum.
1581
« on: April 21, 2015, 09:27 »
I was already wondering why subs were drying up and ODD's were nowhere to be founds these last few weeks. As if things couldn't get worse in microstock already.
I think microstock is going to be very, very different, 3 years from now...
Funny enough I said this 4 days ago, but today I received a whopping 20 ODD's!
1582
« on: April 20, 2015, 15:54 »
had my first sale as well.
However, taxes have indeed been withheld even though I submitted my tax form. I have sent an e-mail to support because no way I'm going to pay taxes if I don't have to.
1583
« on: April 20, 2015, 15:52 »
+ Added a 5-second timer to log into the program automatically.
Has this been removed again? I kinda liked it.
1584
« on: April 17, 2015, 17:03 »
I was already wondering why subs were drying up and ODD's were nowhere to be founds these last few weeks. As if things couldn't get worse in microstock already.
I think microstock is going to be very, very different, 3 years from now...
1585
« on: April 17, 2015, 12:19 »
Everything okay here. Sad that they're pulling an iStock on you.
1586
« on: April 13, 2015, 06:08 »
I don't know why there is so much negativity. It's fair to say the average price of a video on Pond5 is around $50 but we certainly don't get all of that...so to get the full sale price of $49 is an attractive proposition. I think some people are missing the point that VideoBlocks may actually be trying to do something constructive for the contributors with a different concept.
I don't think anyone is missing the point that VB may trying to do something constructive. Just like the tenths of previous attempts you see on the right side. But after 9 years in this business (to me is my sole source of income) I just don't run after every carrot put in front of my nose without thinking in the future.
All I need is an answer from VB regarding their business model and the long term sustainability, because I cannot see it.
If in the future they end up taking 50% of that $49, which I do know is on par with the average sale on P5, all it proves is that the current 100% offer is the mentioned carrot.
Even if they would, and the commission would then be on par with Pond5/SS, as long as they make sales, I don't see the problem. For me, it doesn't matter whether the sale is from SS, Pond5 or VB, the only thing that matters it that the best selling agency gives me better RPD than others.
1587
« on: April 13, 2015, 05:59 »
(...) for the moment, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt. (...)If the current models outgrows itself and management starts to make questionable decisions, I'll pull my files. (...) I doubt they will be able to steal a significant amount of market share from SS or Pond5 in the near future.
And this is exactly what I am talking about.
So, you are willing to take a risk on an agency that you recognize haven't answered valid questions in this topic and others (I would add vital questions) that could severely damage the market and endanger your portfolio, when you do not even believe they will have great relevance in the near future... Oooook...
Of course we'll have to monitor it closely to make sure that we won't be trapped, but so far they have been very open and they have answered most, if not all questions. (Except for the ones above, but let's be patient.) Anyway, if in they do get a significant amount of market share and one of the worst scenarios arises, you believe that by then pulling out the portfolio will make a difference...
Let me tell you that I've seen tenths of boycotts and pulling of portfolios from several agencies. In some cases agencies being the target for these actions more than once. But not only they are still around and strong but the damage they've done endured to this day. Once a price has dropped, they will never go up.
Let me ask you a question: do you believe DPC (which I consider ten times more dangerous than any future scheme VideoBlocks might conceive) has destroyed the stock market after everyone pulled their port/opted out? Personally, I think not. And once an agency becomes very relevant to you your income, contrary to what you say, you will not pull your portfolio. Even if you do, 99% of the other contributors won't, making your action irrelevant. This is what I've been seeing since 2006 with the consequences we are facing today.
True, once the income becomes relevant, it will be a decision based on money as well. But for now it's hard to predict what will happen. Any agency might at some point in the future do something you won't like, but does that keep you from submitting? Who would've thought 5 years ago that iStock would eff up so badly today? There's no way you could have known. Perhaps VideoBlocks will make a change 2 years from now that shakes up the microstock world, perhaps not. It's pure speculation. Video is still a very controlled market. Keep it that way supporting only agencies that leave you absolutely no doubt about their intentions, strategy and capacity to finance themselves without having to resort to dubious actions in order to survive.
The right side of this page is full of these cases. Almost all never got relevant but helped damage the photography market in senseless price wars, dilution of portfolio, and loosing of control of the artists portfolio.
I don't blindly trust agencies and I'll be wary of any decision they make, even Shutterstock and Pond5 aren't sacred in my book.
1588
« on: April 12, 2015, 19:01 »
I think a lot of valid questions have been asked above me, with regards to what future scenarios could arise. However, for the moment, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt. If the current models outgrows itself and management starts to make questionable decisions, I'll pull my files. I doubt they will be able to steal a significant amount of market share from SS or Pond5 in the near future.
1589
« on: April 10, 2015, 09:55 »
When does the marketplace open for customers?
1590
« on: April 10, 2015, 09:02 »
Very few sales this week indeed. I wonder if the Adobe takeover has anything to do with that.
1591
« on: April 10, 2015, 08:45 »
Shutterstock is basically giving away all 100,000+ videos on Bigstock for free already. $99 for up to 300 very good quality videos is one of the worst plans from any agency ever.
I don't see my videos on BigStock, so what do you mean?
I mean the 100,000+ that are up there now.
If all 100,000+ videos on SS are now on BS, why aren't mine there? Are you sure SS has transferred everything? I'd like to know for sure.
1592
« on: April 10, 2015, 08:35 »
It started off nicely with a $24 PP sale.
1593
« on: April 08, 2015, 15:03 »
Shutterstock is basically giving away all 100,000+ videos on Bigstock for free already. $99 for up to 300 very good quality videos is one of the worst plans from any agency ever.
I don't see my videos on BigStock, so what do you mean?
1594
« on: April 08, 2015, 14:54 »
Great news! Keep it up!
1595
« on: April 07, 2015, 10:57 »
Yeah, really nice and competent bunch. I have to give them credit. Always friendly, willing to discuss rejections, bugs and other things. Really trying to help and their replies are personal and nothing canned. Overturning decisions and helping me fix issues in a pin point manner.
On a side note; even though the cannister system is very challenging, I am ok with it. My content is not good enough anyway to reach those goals on any site that has them.
I have to give it to them, I like Bigstock. I am also content with the sales.
Your first sentence made me think you were being sarcastic, but apparently not.
1596
« on: April 03, 2015, 04:32 »
January 24, 2015.
1597
« on: April 02, 2015, 19:00 »
Even so, why would you want to be connected to a clearly shady, non-selling site like YayMicro?
Besides, that site looks absolutely horrendous. 404 pages (blog), no decent interface, horrible logo, no information. Avoid.
1598
« on: April 02, 2015, 15:34 »
Site seems down again.
1599
« on: March 31, 2015, 05:46 »
Past 18 months:
1 EL per 700 dls on average. (1:701)
Past 36 months:
1 EL per 1000 dls on average. (1:992)
All time:
1 EL per 800 dls on average. (1:828)
1600
« on: March 25, 2015, 16:47 »
Sales these days are dire, across all agencies.
Pages: 1 ... 59 60 61 62 63 [64] 65 66 67 68 69 ... 90
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|