MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Phil

Pages: 1 ... 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67
1601
Photoshop Discussion / Re: Image reflections and how to do them
« on: February 07, 2008, 17:39 »
very cool, thanks very much :)

1602
420 for me

1603
Computer Hardware / Re: What monitor type you're using
« on: February 03, 2008, 18:43 »
philips 19" before that laptop screens (4 laptops) so the philips seems very bright but is better than any laptop screen I've used.  Hopefully will replace with 24" dell later in year :)

1604
Featurepics.com / Re: Anyone selling at Featurepics?
« on: February 02, 2008, 23:16 »
Early in the month, I put price up from $2 to $5 based on (yours?) comments on this forum and the fact that istock put price up 50% and I had BME on there (so pricing is too cheap). Anyway FP is not a bigger seller for but I still ended with BME (by $2) for fp for Jan. So going from $2 to $5 didn't do me any harm.  In another month or so, I'll take it $10 and see what that does :)

1605
Crestock.com / Re: Understanding composition
« on: February 02, 2008, 16:03 »
hi

http://www.photoinf.com/

is all about photographic composition, there is a lot of info there, some of it is actually good :)

but it is general and specific for stock, where you always have to remember 'copy space'

1606
Hi,

there are few different ones of this, isn't it just like the extract? command in photoshop?

I struggled with isolations until recently, so I just didn't really bother much. Laurin and others always push learn  photography properly and you don't have problems with noise, isolation etc.  And as I progress I see that this is definetly true. 

Anyway there has been stuff I wanted to do recently on white. I spent time stuffing around with lights (household lights and flashes) and then with a horrible softbox (I know they have there uses and sometimes invaluable but I dont like them, too restrictive).  Anyway I gave up not getting the shots I wanted so went outside for a cigarette and sat depressed :) anyway then it hit me, it was a darkish overcast day, perfect diffused light with just about no shadows. So white table in the garden, still getting shutter spped around 1/100 and we were away.  Each shot that I have processed has taken a minute, quick levels and healing brush. no isolating just perfect, not a lot shots done yet, but all accepted :)

So now I have a lighting solution, and nice place to shoot and a heap of ideas, and of course I keep getting bright sunny days  *LOL*

Phil

1607
General - Top Sites / Re: January 2008 earnings breakdown
« on: January 31, 2008, 19:30 »
Hi

IS 47% BME
SS 20% (last than 65% of my BME)
DT 11% (average)
123 6% BME
FT 4% (picked up this week)
BigStock 4% BME
StockXpert 3% (picked up this week)
CRE 1% (down)
ALB 1% (paid uploads)
FP .7% (BME by $2)
CAN .7% (down)
LO .2% (down)

Istock was up heaps, reached 59% 2 weeks ago, but the others have picked up since.

1608
Lighting / Re: Continuous or strobe lighting?
« on: January 31, 2008, 03:32 »
Yes they are a US product, but b&h etc will ship overseas BUT they only have US power connections :(

1609
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia tightening up standards a bit?
« on: January 31, 2008, 03:26 »
In last 3 days I had:

154 uploaded, 151 accepted, 3 rejected. Hm...

it is not Fotolia, it is your photos, I guess.

I accept I still have a lot to learn :) and try and take rejections on the chin. I look for why it was rejected but when one sites rejects different images from others, you gain nothing from the rejection (I also accept what is art to one person is crap to another).  When that site is only one of many that rejects the image you have to start to say it is site.

I also find it frustrating when rejections are giving for essentially no meaning like 'overfiltered', or fotolias 'technical' problems which list any one of ten different things it could be.  Much like ss rejected 15 images for keywords, I then had to guess which word they didn't like, turned out to be 'image' but it took more rejections, wasting mine and the reviewers time and effort.  If they told me what was wrong i would have fixed it. Also like I said it is also frustrating to have good selling images refused for not being stock.  My 8 highest earning images have been refused from istock as they are 'not stock'. Like I said I have a lot to learn, I just dislike have to guess at what my mistakes are :)

Phil

oh, and obvisously only half my little rant is about fotolia :)

1610
Shutterstock.com / Re: Interesting topic at SS forum
« on: January 30, 2008, 18:31 »


deleted

1611
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia tightening up standards a bit?
« on: January 30, 2008, 18:29 »
"The photographs in the Fotolia database are intended for sale as illustration of brochures, magazines, websites, and presentations. Your photographic work is excellent but does not meet the needs of the Fotolia customer base."

...well no sh*# Sherlock...I've re-dubbed the reviewer from "Atilla-the-Hun" to "Fotila-the-None"...this is really getting goofy...FOTOLIA, please make sure your reviewer is looking through the proper end of the microscope.

its like its istock's "this is not stock", feel like yelling at the monitor, Why the F*** is it selling so well elsewhere then???

1612
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia tightening up standards a bit?
« on: January 30, 2008, 14:38 »
out of 27
7 overabundant photo category
7 type of photograph

123 also knocked back 7 of them (which was much worse than usual, and I had been pleased with this batch, thought I done better than my average), anyway only 1 of their 7 was in the 14 refused by fotolia :(:(

1613
Adobe Stock / Re: Slow slow sales @ Fotolia
« on: January 30, 2008, 01:03 »
Fotolia has been the most stable and probably best site for me in the past few months.
Overall Rank: 2
7 days rank : 2

if you hit the top do you go back to bottom and start again?

1614
Dreamstime.com / Re: Dreamstime not good!
« on: January 29, 2008, 23:03 »
Found this on another forum would anyone comment before joining :)

Let's be very clear about this. DT will not allow you to DELETE any images after the requisite 6 month period is up. You can only "disable" them as I said, which is of course another way of saying, we're going to hold onto them for as long we like because if we actually let you delete anything you also inadvertently reduce the value of our company.
 
Which also means should they decide to sell up or go bust he still has a bucket load of stock to open his next stall with.

Cha ching!

And then to add insult to injury you also forfeit all earnings if you happen to be a few cents short of the $100 mark as we were when we decided we'd had enough of these scam artists.

Need I say anymore!!!!



hi, my thoughts :)

I dont see how disabled images could improve the value of a company, I dont see how they have any value??
I also dont think DT is likely to go bust in a real hurry.
I also dont think they are likely to restart another agency with all the disabled images if they were to go bust
I think it is first time I've heard DT referred as scam artists (maybe I just haven't been listening?) I think someone got their account canned or something and is very bitter about it???

Phil

1615
General - Top Sites / Re: How is January doing for you?
« on: January 29, 2008, 22:22 »
just hit my bme :)

although it is not proportional to the amount of uploading I have done, and half the sites are down, but IS has covered the others reduction.... but its a bme, and I have a mountain of bills so I'm happy :)

1616
TV is SOOOoooooo 1900's

:) I cant remember the last I actually watched tv (as opposed to a dvd). I can quote probably every disney or pixar movie, and pick the voices excellent as my kids have them on while I am photoshopping etc.  But I couldn't name a single big hit series at the moment.

Even then my kids dont watch "tv" as such, if not a dvd, there on the net or off doing other things.

1617
I am hiding from my girlfriend...she want me to do some diy!

LOL!!!!!

in 10 minutes a day, you can learn a lot :)

1618
123RF / Re: 123... yawn
« on: January 28, 2008, 19:01 »
Thanks for the suggestions.  I will try the "Fave" thing and see if it makes a difference for me. 

Connie

within a couple of weeks of doing the faved, my sales increased heaps.  Once a week I spend ten minutes, have a look and my old faves, new images I want to be faves, faves that haven't sold etc.  Its a system I like.

This month 123rf will be my number 4 at about 6% of sales, double what I get from StockXpert.

Phil

1619
General Macrostock / Re: Photographers Direct
« on: January 24, 2008, 23:47 »
I tell you something hilarious about PD.

If you go to Alexa and check out their traffic details, you will see people who visit their site often then go to istock or another micro site.

I reckon this is because PD has a great page telling buyers how they can get the same quality "for a few cents" at a micro stock agency, and how this is unfair.

If they just shut up they would stop people leaving the site and the chances are they would buy from them.

LOL!!!!!!

and you look through their requests and like said it's all exotic places. then what is offered is often $50-$100 for RM often exclusive licensing (hmm, comparable to el sales)

But I and some friends of mine found they were very odd about which images got through to the customers.  It seemed and maybe I'm wrong that those who pay storage got their images through to customers where those dont pay only get through if noone else contributes....






1620
Site Related / Re: StockXpert nightmare
« on: January 24, 2008, 23:33 »
Well, this was an enlightening thread... I just got accepted to StockXpert (first try) and currently have 150 images in the queue and at least that many in my briefcase waiting to be transferred at 50 per day.  It will be interesting to see what happens when they get reviewed.  I think I will continue to upload what I currently have until I see what happens and take it from there.  I see that StockXpert is in the "big 6", which is strange!  I figured BigStock or Fotolia wout be above it, but I only have about 500 images in my portfolios.

they are 2nd-3rd worst for rejections for me, and of course review times are a joke, I've had faster reviews at alamy.

But re big 6.  some people rave about how well they do and how it is up and coming, it is their number 3 etc.  Personally it has been declining since september and it will be continue to be number 7 for me in january with less than 3% of earnings.

1621
Site Related / midstock section???
« on: January 23, 2008, 01:35 »
just a thought.  there is a macro stock section (with just alamy and 'general')   should there be a 'midstock' section or even just a "general midstock" top level thread ??

1622
hmmm... well the plugin looks good  ... LOL

can post a link to the plugin or even write down the name.  My hearings not the greatest and whilst get most of things said I cant quite make out the name of the plugin.

Thanks
Phil

1623

What else we would like to ask Buyers?


Where have you all been hiding!

LOL!!!

1624
Site Related / Re: Getty for Sale?
« on: January 22, 2008, 18:31 »
They have chosen the best moment for being auctioned

yep, ebay had half price listing fees last week (at least here they did) would be quite a saving on $1.5bn :)

1625
General Macrostock / How to decide
« on: January 22, 2008, 18:30 »
Hi,

For those who have seperate portfolios for micro and macro (and / or midstock) how do you decide which portfolio to put an image in??

Thanks
Phil

Pages: 1 ... 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors