pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Artist

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 ... 46
176
AI is also bad news for agencies, eventually stock image users will be able to download cheap versions of AI software and get the images they want without paying subscriptions. In the medium term, AI will not only kill the contributors but also the agencies
It will not kill and will not even create competition. I dealt with one program that converts HD to 4k and removes any noise from the video, but it needs a very powerful PC to work, and even on a powerful PC it takes a lot of time. As a result, the cost of a PC and electricity will block the profit.

One can easily rent a cloud GPU at very cheap price.

177
Shutterstock.com / Re: What a cool SS, how well he sells
« on: November 10, 2022, 00:53 »
Whoah.... I mean WHOAH!!!

What??? ... WOW this is huge...

178
Alamy.com / Re: Alamy search giving zero result
« on: November 08, 2022, 22:37 »
Hi, Is Alamy down? I am doing general search on any topics and getting zero results.
I had the same last week, and it seemed my defaults had been set, and not by me, to only show the 'Vital', 'Uncut' and 'Ultimate' collections and not any of the rest. I had to change my defaults to see everything.
Alternatively:
https://discussion.alamy.com/topic/16149-another-crazy-reason-to-use-editorial-use-only

works fine now.

179
Alamy.com / Alamy search giving zero result
« on: November 08, 2022, 05:36 »
Hi, Is Alamy down? I am doing general search on any topics and getting zero results.

180
Adobe Stock / Re: Adobe Stock Free Collection: Video Nominations
« on: November 07, 2022, 06:04 »
Thanks Mat.
I went to my profile settings and changed the option.
However I did not receive any email from you regarding the nomination, neither now nor in June for photo nomination.
I usually receive an email per day from Adobe, regarding the daily earnings. I also checked in the spam folder but I don't have any email from you.
It's a shame because I definitely would have joined the proposal.

The train is lost dear, you can't do anything now.

181
Adobe Stock / Re: Adobe Stock Free Collection: Video Nominations
« on: October 28, 2022, 21:59 »
Do you have more than $100,000 per month?
Why are you wasting your time on this forum then.

That's the most dumb reply. If someone makes six fig earning, one should appreciate his guts to come out and tell the positive side when everyone talks about the negative.
And he is not wasting his time on this forum, Forum is for everyone.

182
General - Top Sites / Re: Dall e 2 will make us all redundant?
« on: October 25, 2022, 23:44 »
Somehow I feel AI could be a final nail in the microstock coffin.

I predicted the same few months back.
https://www.microstockgroup.com/general-stock-discussion/artificial-intelligence-killing-the-whole-industry/

There were people defending the same and I always said that AI training has no expiry and there is no roll-back.
This industry do not have a good future. Mark my words.

183
Shutterstock.com / Re: Working together to lead the way with AI
« on: October 25, 2022, 10:10 »
So now the buyers will start generating the images more instead of buying and since there is revenue share so start expecting more incoming pennies with decreasing the real downloads.

184
iStockPhoto.com / Re: September sales statement in
« on: October 22, 2022, 01:24 »
Not a good month for me.

185
General Stock Discussion / Re: No sales on Shutterstock lately
« on: October 20, 2022, 01:25 »
Yes pickup very well from 13th.. Happy to see sales coming back.

186
General Stock Discussion / Re: Any Vecteezy contributor here?
« on: October 15, 2022, 23:59 »
Quote
What 14000 download makes you earn $140 ? ? ? ?

Obviously (almost) free ones

Get a pair of cloths and 14000 downloads gone.  ;D

187
General Stock Discussion / Re: Any Vecteezy contributor here?
« on: October 15, 2022, 04:54 »
Bad luck  ::)

https://www.microstockgroup.com/general-stock-discussion/vecteezy-anyone-experience-with-them/msg575598/#msg575598

oooooh how sorry i am for not seeing this year ago. I know a contributor there with 14000 downloads for 140$. that is 0.01 per pic. Now i want out and i bet they will have my port for eternity. I dont know how malpractice like this is even possible. Even worse, i have a feeling they made this platform as a kind of fraud. Posts are deleted, delete button does not exist (once u submit, pics are locked there), ports are kept (officially) for a year AND they promise 'reasonable effort" to take them away from partners site - read never. Therefor new contributors are accepted and welcomed, to replace those coming out.  All that for up to few cents per pic, no exceptions.

What 14000 download makes you earn $140 ? ? ? ?

188
It's early in the day and I'm already at around 4x to 5x my normal downloads and earnings for a weekday.

Anyone else seeing a really high volume today?

Not here but congratulations to you.  8)

189
Here comes Google's text to 3d generation.



https://dreamfusion3d.github.io/

190
I just found this on one forum. This AI has totally ripped of microstock content.





191
I just found that they have reduced the contributor share a lot from what they use to pay.
With their new earning model, people have went down from lowest to ultra lowest and then they also need a certificate of residency, which reduces the total even more.

192

And the saddest thing to me is that they did not even bother to pay for the images used to train the AI, as they were clearly watermarked.
Yes, they give copyright to the"describers" of the AI generated images, but they used images to train it where they did not own copyright themselves. They can probably get away with this legally, but moraly I find all of this highly repulsive. They basically used our own images without paying for them to create something that one day in the future will most likely destroy our line of work.

I agree to it. I have access to some of the AI tools and sometimes when I specifically generate any works I can see watermarks of Getty, Alamy, Shutterstock, Dreamstime etc., Though the watermark is so glitched that it cannot be tracked, but since I work in this industry, I can clearly identify those.

So the point is, they created an AI robot which went through almost all microstock website, scraped the whole library of copyrighted IP images to train their AI system. And now they come-up saying that they have built something unique. Doesn't it comes in plagiarism?

But again, this has grown so badly that you cannot take any action as their legal team will easily bypass the trial.

I am also interested to know that with whose permission did they scrapped whole microstock websites. Do those websites even knew about it?

193
I don't welcome AI invading the world of human expression, personal ideas, and efforts, but here it is.

Even I don't welcome, but this is unstoppable and inevitable. We have to accept it sadly.

194
Shutterstock.com / Re: Recent Adjustments to Earnings
« on: September 24, 2022, 06:53 »

Discovered a one-line text below my earnings for the month with the text: 'There have been recent adjustments to your earnings' with 'recent adjustments' as link. Needless to say that with SS these days the 'link' is a 404 error. Anyone else? What does it all mean? :o

Normal, I have tons of adjusted earnings.

195
All of those images look terribly unrealistic. The faces seem thoroughly airbrushed of realistic wrinkles and textures. Look fake even to an untrained naked eye.

Correct, but remember, its been only one month and some programs are still in beta mode.

196
Good job banning these AI images, but how do they know it was generated via AI?  How will they be going back to purge previously accepted AI imagery?

They probably need another AI to detect AI.. haha  ;D

197
Great move by Getty:



Effective immediately, Getty Images will cease to accept all submissions created using AI generative models (e.g., Stable Diffusion, Dall‑E 2, MidJourney, etc.) and prior submissions utilizing such models will be removed.

There are open questions with respect to the copyright of outputs from these models and there are unaddressed rights issues with respect to the underlying imagery and metadata used to train these models.

These changes do not prevent the submission of 3D renders and do not impact the use of digital editing tools (e.g., Photoshop, Illustrator, etc.) with respect to modifying and creating imagery.

Best wishes,

Getty Images | iStock

198

that's a big reason why this is unlikely for DALL-E since they have a commitment to prevent this scenario. Thus, they have to keep control of the software. 

  • Theyre rejecting image uploads that include recognizable faces, as well as generation prompts that seek to recreate the likeness of public figures (celebrities and politicians, for example), or realistic photos of real individuals.
  • Theyre improving their filters to block users from creating harmful content this includes violent, adult, or political content and also removing this kind of data from the softwares training altogether.
  • Theyre using both automated and human monitors to supervise the platform and avoid misuse

Got this email today:
You can now upload and edit photos with faces with DALLE.

Many of you have told us that you miss using DALLE to dream up outfits and hairstyles on yourselves and edit the backgrounds of family photos. A reconstructive surgeon told us that hed been using DALLE to help his patients visualize results. And filmmakers have told us that they want to be able to edit images of scenes with people to help speed up their creative processes.

With improvements in our safety system, DALLE is now ready to support these delightful and important use cases while minimizing the potential of harm from deepfakes.

We made our filters more robust at rejecting attempts to generate sexual, political, and violent content while also working to reduce false flags and built new detection and response techniques to stop misuse.

Our content policy still prevents uploading images of anyone without their consent, or images that you do not have the rights to.

We hope this update helps you use DALLE in even more creative and practical ways. Were excited to see what you create!
- The OpenAI Team


______________________________________________

Nothing is permanent here, something not available today will be available tomorrow.
Small resolution, fast rendering, more accurate generation etc. will all come very soon.

This is not any tool, it's AI, it is self learning everyday and will become smarter and smarter.

199
Should I upload my seagull sheep? Far from killing the industry, I think this opens up subjects I had never thought of before :)

Far currently, but will soon reach.
Accept the reality, AI is a continuous self learning program, everyday it is getting smarter.

The foundation is strong, and soon it will cover all the sectors.

200
I've uploaded this particular AI image created by DALLE2 throughout and testing the results.

Quality is pretty bad (particularly after up-sizing) so I suspect that it will be rejected by all, but interesting to see either way.

I have seen these AI tool are not so good in creating human figures. Look at the model hands, those doesn't feels natural to me.
But since it is still learning, in couple of months or years it will generate very perfect image. This is not the end, its beginning of AI.

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 ... 46

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors