176
General Stock Discussion / Re: Just selling prints on fine art america vs stock sites
« on: April 22, 2018, 02:00 »
For me stocks generate far more income than these print sites.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 176
General Stock Discussion / Re: Just selling prints on fine art america vs stock sites« on: April 22, 2018, 02:00 »
For me stocks generate far more income than these print sites.
177
General Stock Discussion / Re: Anyone selling something on storyblocks ???« on: April 22, 2018, 01:58 »
Over 7000 pix. 2$ "earnings". Useless.
178
Pond5 / Re: Pond 5 Survey: asking to donate money to support film makers« on: April 06, 2018, 04:56 »
Stopped uploading there one month ago, due to low kick.
But i specialize in imagery, not video. 179
Dreamstime.com / Re: Dreamstime Files Lawsuit Against Google« on: April 06, 2018, 04:55 »
Poor DT tries to earn money from big fat G.
World is very predictive. 180
Alamy.com / Re: Alamy Record of contract changes...« on: April 06, 2018, 04:53 »
No earner to me, so not interested regarding any news from Alamy.
181
123RF / Re: 123rf reducing commissions« on: April 06, 2018, 04:51 »
Forget about this crap, stopped uploading there 4 months ago.
182
DepositPhotos / Re: Depositphotos pays 3% to contributors on 5-image "subscription"« on: April 06, 2018, 04:50 »
Forget about this crap, stopped uploading there 4 months ago.
183
Image Sleuth / Re: "Professional" site using all stolen watermarked images« on: April 04, 2018, 05:42 »
Pretty sure that about 60% images on the web are stolen.
184
Shutterstock.com / Re: New SS interface« on: April 04, 2018, 03:36 »
Redesigning won't help them from decline.
Greed will kill their project and then all industry itself. Firstly, they must solve content spammers problem, because it looks like that 100 millions of images out of 195 millions are similars and pure garbage. Rules must be strict - immediate ban, with only ONE warning. As for the second, to simplify things they must write script, which will delete all images, that are not downloaded for say 2 years or so. This is logical solution. But my life experience shows, that main heads of the projects in 99% cases are pretty much dumb golden boys (or big papa's girls) and it is almost useless to wait for adequate solutions from such "personalities". 185
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Thinkstock Gone?« on: April 04, 2018, 03:23 »oh iam so excited! Next is SS with Bigstock... R2D2, looks like that this statement is pretty close to reality. Not so long ago i've seen some agencies, that are proud of 0.25$ royalties. And positioning such earnings as advancement. Situation is demanding completely new marketplace that will over-top SS. 186
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock - Where are we going?« on: March 23, 2018, 09:00 »All other phones including newest iPhones and googlophones are pure crap and could not be submitted. yeap, if newest smartphones don't have appropriate sensors (in terms of physical size), then drones don't have them definitely. 187
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock - Where are we going?« on: March 22, 2018, 10:26 »When these things happenning I think that it is really the end… I submit *heavy* processed images from Nokia PureView 808 shrinked to 3000 width. Only daylight images with good illumination could reach acceptable quality. I have hacked firmware which gives me not 38MP, but 41.5 output. The second phone that can provide similar quality is Panasonic CM-1. All other phones including newest iPhones and googlophones are pure crap and could not be submitted. And you know why they accept low-quality images, because of their greed. It is transparent. 188
Newbie Discussion / Re: 500px--Any Sales? Should I renew my membership?« on: December 25, 2017, 08:26 »189
New Sites - General / Re: Mega Sales on 500px!!!!« on: December 25, 2017, 08:23 »Not expecting any good news from this site from here on out. They should change the name from 500px to 5px.101% true. Original post looks like cheap ad of 5px site. 190
Microstock News / Re: A new website on the Microstock market - www.bestartstock.com« on: December 10, 2017, 09:36 »
My 5cents into conversation.
Compare with this: http://a4stockphotos.com/ Bestartstock is deadly alike a4stock! I've earned 7$ via a4. Stunning! I think that above mentioned stuff should explain to you everything. 191
Newbie Discussion / Re: 500px--Any Sales? Should I renew my membership?« on: December 10, 2017, 09:32 »Nope! Absolutely precise answer! After 2 years of being there i've earned ~110$ [250$ in total but - 140$ for awesome subscription]. Almost 8000 images and ~2.5 million of views. Pretty useless in terms of money earning. 192
General Stock Discussion / 0.13 sales on Dreamstime« on: November 30, 2017, 07:01 »
Hooray! We've reached new low. That is definitely was my sacred dream!
Yeahhh! And it turned to reality! How about 0.0013 then?? Get psyched! Oh i am so psyched 193
General Stock Discussion / Re: freepik: another low player?« on: November 11, 2017, 05:32 »
Guys, thanks for your opinions!
194
General Stock Discussion / freepik: another low player?« on: November 10, 2017, 10:04 »
https://www.freepik.com/
Accidentally found them on the web. Your thoughts? But wait, i need to grab a popcorn:) Just kiddin' 195
General Stock Discussion / Re: Art.com selling my work, without notification« on: November 10, 2017, 10:02 »I think that BigStock was one of the agencies that followed the model that each actual print sale would generate one regular license (versus buying an EL to offer a number of prints for sale). This idea first surfaced about a decade ago (I think with Fotolia initially). Lots of contributors argued. We lost. I wrote to them about infringement, we'll see their opinion regarding the subject. I don't have any hopes, wrote to them just for fun. 196
General Stock Discussion / Re: Art.com selling my work, without notification« on: November 08, 2017, 18:22 »
Thanks for explanation!
I have portfolio on Bigstock. But I don't have EL sales there, so art.com could not sell my prints, in theory:) 197
General Stock Discussion / Art.com selling my work, without notification« on: November 08, 2017, 11:43 »198
Shutterstock.com / Re: New submission editor page« on: November 08, 2017, 04:16 »I just submitted a couple of files and everything looks the same to me - did I misunderstand what page you were referring to or is this rolling out in phases. I'm on the US West CoastI have no changes too. I am in Germany in terms of ip. My colleague reported new interface in eastern part of Russia. 199
Newbie Discussion / Re: should I mask iPhone front face« on: November 08, 2017, 02:10 »
Looks like you don't get the point.
I am talking about concrete device mentioned in the header. You don't have full control over it. Landlord of it is company - not you. Choose device that can be fully rooted and doesn't have beetle markers in it. Privacy is what i am talking about. 200
Newbie Discussion / Re: should I mask iPhone front face« on: November 07, 2017, 11:55 »Or, you could do what I did - download iOS 11.1 and turn your iPhone into a brick ;-) Yeah, this fact also illustrates the whole mess with this tekno thingy. |
|