176
General Stock Discussion / Re: Shutterstat - TOP Images and Authors from Shutterstock
« on: May 17, 2016, 15:25 »
good job!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 176
General Stock Discussion / Re: Shutterstat - TOP Images and Authors from Shutterstock« on: May 17, 2016, 15:25 »
good job!
177
Paypal / Re: Don't trust in Paypal - your account can be limited without any evident reason« on: May 08, 2016, 18:57 »
I had my account limited because of an European Law about "money laundering" that happens whenever you reach an yearly given amount for the first time. So that was great for me
![]() ![]() I can't blame Paypal for this. Just tell everyone my account was limited. But pay attention: limit is not something that blocks your work: you can RECEIVE money. Sometimes limit needs some actions to be unlocked: in my case they asked me some documents to prove that I'm me. And I don't feel bad about this. Someone else could have done some identity theft ... and now my money could be gone. Limit has been removed in 3 workdays after my answer. What I could blame paypal about is their abolutely wasteful customer care: I've followed word for word their instructions to contact them: I waited on the phone for the customer service 30 minutes. And it was enough. They never answered. This sucks. 178
General Stock Discussion / Re: Become a Millionair via Microstock Sales« on: May 08, 2016, 18:19 »Has any contributor ever become a millionair selling images? Is it possible for anyone to do it? work, work, work. or in other words: think, organize, shoot, edit, upload, index and restart. EVERY SINGLE DAY. 179
Panthermedia.net / Re: Panthermedia new negative record: 0.11 for one sale« on: May 04, 2016, 15:24 »I removed my portfolio from Panther last summer to get out of their (no opt out-able) partner program. Unfortunately their partners are still selling my images. their indexing site is terrible ... but if you don't have more than 4000 files don't expect earnings from panther. 180
Photo Critique / Re: Anyone care to critique my SS photos? (Only 20 or so) Thanks!« on: April 12, 2016, 12:29 »Just wanted to see what others thought. I have sold three photos on SS so far, but just wanted to get some idea if these photos will ever sell. Thanks in advance! Almost the whole of these photographs are unprofessional-looking. There are lots of improvements you can learn simply reading and practicing every kind of photographic or photo-retouching forun on the internet (fstoppers and so on). Light is poor, sad. Point of view is ordinary: like every other tourist would have shot these images. People are not models but not so interesting. There are a couple of interesting images: clean, not messy, concept-alike (feet on the water etc) . Need LOTS of improvement with editing. The "holidays" shots would be good with heavy enhancement in light: there is basic light good given to you by the nature, but you have to let it pop-out. Another chance is to let LIFE pop out from your images: emotions. You can simply browse some flyers or brochures everywhere in the world: learn the basics of the "feeling". Holidays/tourism shootings would have to go to the "next level" to sell more. Commercial needs: 1) tecnical perfection 2) EMOTIONS 3) clear concept (very focused on "what does this say?"). So: good start but learn, improve, photoshop! ![]() ![]() And laugh with this : http://g3.img-dpreview.com/F37191D1B8814647BAC7F149B1EBAB29.jpg :-) 181
General Stock Discussion / Re: Does social media help sell your microstock ?« on: April 10, 2016, 19:33 »Because of posting my work on social media I have gotten thousands of dollars of work from people. So in an indirect way people did pay you microstock work or other work? 182
General Stock Discussion / Re: Does social media help sell your microstock ?« on: April 10, 2016, 17:13 »
I've heard an early microstock-adopter saying that social media and social network are counter-productive because they seem to change a "ratio" in which your images are viewed LOTS of times and NEVER bought. So this message is "many viewers, no buyers : your images suck".
Of course I don't expect agencies to tell this is true because for them "every visitor = WIN!" Don't really know. A good place is where images are requested but, another time, I don't expect to be a good move to spam groups, forums of graphic designers and webmasters with "here I am!!!! I have the PERFECT image for you!!!!!" because if everyone of us starts doing this ... it will became a mess ![]() (sorry for my English, folks) 183
General Stock Discussion / Re: Google trends on Istock, ShutterStock, Fotolia, Alamy, Getty« on: March 31, 2016, 12:14 »Thanks for sharing! 184
PhotoDune / Re: EU VAT and European Photographers.« on: March 10, 2016, 16:51 »
It would be nice if Envato wanted to help us everybody to understand this more clearly.
185
General Stock Discussion / Absolute exclusivity?« on: March 09, 2016, 22:06 »
Hallo Everybody.
I'm not sure I've understood well exclusivity terms on top, middle tier and first 3 low Earners. I mean: except for those agencies in which there is an option for EVERY image to tell if that image is exclusive for that agency, I have this kind of doubt: I understand that an agency wants me to be exclusive in this way: what I upload to that agency can't be uploaded in other agencies. But... if I understand correctly iStock exclusive means you have to work ONLY for iStock ... that you can't upload something else in another agency. Am I right? Are there some other Agencies that "seize" you completely and not only your selected work? 186
PhotoDune / EU VAT and European Photographers.« on: March 09, 2016, 21:59 »I saw Photodune collects VAT in european countries on behalf of us. I guess THIS is the "before taxes" (higher) value I see in my earnings tab. But if the photogpher is European (s)he has to pay TWICE ? I mean: with US companies we fill that W8BEN forms to apply for tax treaties. That often means we pay our taxes in our country and NOT in USA. Now, if I understand well, Envato states they collect VAT and they write off those values from our earnings. (FIRST TAX PAYING) Then I have to pay taxes in my (European) Country. (SECOND TAX PAYING) Am I right? Yes: THIS SUCKS No: Could you explain to me how does it work? 187
PhotoDune / Photodune Stats?« on: March 09, 2016, 21:51 »
Hallo,
I just want to be able to understand whats sells. On Envato I can't find simple stats ... tonight "analytics" (I discovered this right now) didn't work ... and it seems I have to browse ALL MY PORTFOLIO and see if there is a particular image selling. I can't believe this is the way ... But I can't find the intelligent one :-/ Anyone that could help? 188
123RF / can't understand how to calculate earnings« on: March 09, 2016, 21:48 »
Hallo everybody.
As in subject ... I can't figure out how to calculate my earnings ... their tables are so confusing for me ![]() is there someone so kind to explain to me how to read and combine that numbers? ![]() 189
General Stock Discussion / Re: YouTube "spits" on your DMCA notices (How Sony Music infringes copyrights)« on: February 28, 2016, 18:49 »
and what did Envato do to help you and themselves to protect your (and theirs) work? 190
Veer / Re: Veer stealing my work« on: February 28, 2016, 18:41 »If we ever get our act together and get a union/coop we should demand a delete button on these sites. Most important to get it off the partners, but if they are too incompetent to pull the plug at least we could ourselves.... I see B&H workers solved some problems with that ... ![]() 191
Alamy.com / Re: Alamy- Any success??« on: February 28, 2016, 18:37 »I don't know why people complain about Alamy and their upload process. That's exactly what I mean. 192
Alamy.com / Re: Alamy- Any success??« on: February 28, 2016, 18:35 »... That's absolutely true and that's why I don't think I'm going to spend my efforts even if I don't love their online indexing system at all. 193
Alamy.com / Re: Alamy- Any success??« on: February 26, 2016, 19:58 »With a portfolio of 8k and online since 4 month. less than 2000 images and 800 not indexed yet (because is VERY time consuming on their site). a few sales but promising sales: high earnings compared to every other site. To make a realistic comparison: it's worth uploading on alamy and spend some time and effort there rather than doing the same thing on your worst 5 low-earners agencies. 194
General Stock Discussion / Re: Confirmed: VCG will acquire Corbis« on: January 24, 2016, 23:29 »That didn't take long. Everyone got the "Corbis, VCG, Getty Images & You!" email? it works for me http://www.corbisimages.com/content/corbisfaq/ but they didn't cite Veer contributors clearly. 195
Shutterstock.com / Re: SS - Important notice about contributor payouts« on: January 24, 2016, 23:19 »If it doesn't make you feel good, it's probably not good news. Maybe it sounds simplistic but I totally agree. Veer didn't work good: Corbis and Veer sold. Yaymicro sucked: they totally changed. mmmmh... 196
General Stock Discussion / Re: How to sell photos in Getty Images?« on: January 24, 2016, 23:07 »Shoot exclusive. If they accept any image from the shoot, you cannot submit elsewhere. 197
General Stock Discussion / Re: How to sell photos in Getty Images?« on: January 24, 2016, 23:05 »Shoot exclusive. If they accept any image from the shoot, you cannot submit elsewhere. So I can work for Agency A and B given I don't send content "C" to both of them: I have to send "C" to one (GI) and "D" to another one. Am I right? 198
General Stock Discussion / Re: Panthermedia« on: January 24, 2016, 23:02 »No Problems here. Tried Firefox and Chrome. Both times I got access to contributor site. and what about ftp? no connection ... 199
General Stock Discussion / Re: How to sell photos in Getty Images?« on: January 21, 2016, 13:21 »Shoot exclusive. If they accept any image from the shoot, you cannot submit elsewhere. So you're saying that THE SHOT has to be exclusive, but you can send other shots (reasonably different from that one) and of course work for other agencies, am I right? The problem in "exclusive" is "Exclusive photographer VS Exclusive photograph". 200
General Stock Discussion / Re: Do you enjoy adding meta data?« on: January 17, 2016, 20:15 »I'm curious how keywording is for other people. I create images in large amounts and keywording is a very mentally taxing process for me because my brain does not handle redundancy well. In fact, some of my errors / rejections are result of a mind that keeps forcing itself into auto-pilot during submission process. This goes double for Istock's disambiguation system. I hate it. ![]() ![]() It has to be done in the right way. And it's absolutely crucial. But ... MY GOD, I hate it. ![]() My technique: 1) keyword the group for what it's shared 2) freely keyword and insert title/description for images on which this is simple and obvious. 3) completely review this process in deep-meta in my native language and add some other keywords. 1.1 swear ![]() 2.1 swear, moan ![]() 3.1 moan, swear, cry ![]() Then I have some automated tools ![]() |
|