MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Shelma1
Pages: 1 ... 68 69 70 71 72 [73] 74 75 76 77 78 ... 116
1801
« on: April 04, 2015, 05:48 »
I wonder if the business owners who are tacking on a visible surcharge for the wage increase also tacked on visible surcharges when the cost of coffee went up, or the cost of flour, or the cost of every other thing they buy on a daily basis. Seems to me like they are making more of a political statement.
I suspect the 'political statement' theory is true. But it's also true about the costs of flour, coffee, labor and everything else: When businesses have to pay more to be in business, they have to raise prices or else operate at a loss.
If costs of labor go up 15%, then most of what businesses buy will go up (suppliers eventually have to pay higher labor costs too). The result is that employees make more money, but the things they buy cost more. All that has really happened is inflation. Unfortunately gov can't create new wealth by passing laws.
Yes, prices will go up. But they won't go up as much as salaries will rise. Payroll is just one expense of running a business. Rent, for example, won't double overnight. Equipment has already been purchased. And I'm glad to see the public backlash. Do business owners think people will want to see some poor working person's slight minimum wage increase broken out on their bill? Customers interact with staff, not business owners, most of the time. So customers will have sympathy for the people they know and see every day.
1802
« on: April 03, 2015, 20:51 »
Your facts are little more than spin. They're assumptions based on a biased viewpoint. I was not a privileged person like you were. I had to do military service to pay for my education. But you don't even have to do that. You can apply for grants or use scholarships to go to technical school to learn a useful trade that will guarantee that you will never have to work for minimum wage. In the state where I live, all you need to do is graduate from high school with a C average and you get to go to technical school for FREE.
Those are facts. Minimum wage is not supposed to be a living wage. If it were, every lazy person out there would just go flip burgers and our economy would go in the toilet.
"According to Bloomberg, college tuition and fees have increased 1,120 percent since records began in 1978.
Using this chart to explain its findings, Bloomberg reports that the rate of increase in college costs has been 'four times faster than the increase in the consumer price index.' It also notes that 'medical expenses have climbed 601 percent, while the price of food has increased 244 percent over the same period.'"
The cost of a college education has increased more than 1,000% since 1978, while the minimum wage has increased about 275%.
You can apply for grants or scholarships, but there's no guarantee you'll get them. And everyone can't serve in the military. You can't even get a student loan unless you qualifyI couldn't.
I'm not sure why you are so adamantly opposed to the minimum wage simply keeping pace with the economy.
Because it makes no sense to have the same minimum wage in areas of the country with vastly different costs of living. City leaders in San Francisco can thump their chests all they want about raising the minimum wage there to $15 an hour, but that amount has less spending potential than $7.25 an hour where I live.
All I've seen from people with views similar to yours is demagoguery about sticking it to corporations and the "oligarchs" who run small pizza shops. It's garbage.
Did you try to serve in the military to pay for school? Did you make that effort? I doubt it. Fact is, people who think they're stuck earning minimum wage haven't made the effort needed to get a job that pays more than minimum wage. If they did, fewer people would be available for those jobs and the demand would increase the pay.
No, I have no interest in serving in the military. But since I didn't do EXACTLY what you did, I didn't make an effort. Working 40 hours a week and taking 18 credits a semester in two majors is not making an effort, to you. Amazing. And I don't understand how requiring companies to pay a minimum wage that simply keeps pace with inflation is "sticking it" to corporations. CEOs make higher and ever higher salaries while wages for workers have stagnated. The gulf between them grows every day. Corporations are raking in record profits off the backs of their workforce. They're sticking it to workers and have been for decadesnot the other way around. Yet you feel sorry for them. Pizza shop guy will just have to raise prices. How much is a pizza where you live? You think people can't afford to pay a buck more? Move to a place with lower rent, then.
1803
« on: April 03, 2015, 12:12 »
I just submitted three images, all shot on the same day, same lighting, same subject, etc, each just a couple of minutes apart. I broke them up into two submissions. The first two were accepted and the third, in a different submission, was rejected for lighting. Not exactly a glut of images in that vein. I really do think it depends somewhat on the reviewer you get that day.
1804
« on: April 03, 2015, 12:06 »
Your facts are little more than spin. They're assumptions based on a biased viewpoint. I was not a privileged person like you were. I had to do military service to pay for my education. But you don't even have to do that. You can apply for grants or use scholarships to go to technical school to learn a useful trade that will guarantee that you will never have to work for minimum wage. In the state where I live, all you need to do is graduate from high school with a C average and you get to go to technical school for FREE.
Those are facts. Minimum wage is not supposed to be a living wage. If it were, every lazy person out there would just go flip burgers and our economy would go in the toilet.
"According to Bloomberg, college tuition and fees have increased 1,120 percent since records began in 1978. Using this chart to explain its findings, Bloomberg reports that the rate of increase in college costs has been 'four times faster than the increase in the consumer price index.' It also notes that 'medical expenses have climbed 601 percent, while the price of food has increased 244 percent over the same period.'" The cost of a college education has increased more than 1,000% since 1978, while the minimum wage has increased about 275%. You can apply for grants or scholarships, but there's no guarantee you'll get them. And everyone can't serve in the military. You can't even get a student loan unless you qualifyI couldn't. I'm not sure why you are so adamantly opposed to the minimum wage simply keeping pace with the economy.
1805
« on: April 03, 2015, 11:44 »
Subs (Shutterstock) took a toll on microstock -> microstock (iStock) took a toll on macrostock -> macrostock took a toll on custom photography -> photography took a toll on painting
The global marketplace has taken a toll on workers in wealthier nations, as their work is outsourced to countries where workers can get by on lower pay.
Microstock opened up new markets. Before that, small companies and individuals couldn't afford stock, and you had to know someone to get representation as a photographer or illustrator. Microstock allowed unknowns to get their work represented and made their work affordable to a broader market.
I'm not sure what the answer is, except to keep your eye on the ball and change with the times and be flexible and look for new opportunities as they arise. (And if other micro sites have no choice other than following SS's lead, they'd better get cracking and find a way to crack the large enterprise market.)
1806
« on: April 03, 2015, 08:09 »
In Utopia, $8/hour jobs are held by high school kids who are on their way to college and making a better living.
In America, the oligarchs buy government representation and lobby to pass laws that benefits themselves and their business interests, which has led to increasing disparity between rich and poor. The U.S. now has the largest gap between rich and poor of any industrialized nation. They also cut spending on education, making it more difficult for people to get ahead. This leads to adult heads of households struggling to feed their families on minimum wage salaries. It's more difficult to be upwardly mobile in the U.S. than in many other comparable economies.
Yes, business owners take risksbut one of the challenges of starting a business is being able to make that business profitable while paying a living wage to your employees. Insurance, equipment and other associated costs have not been kept artificially low while inflation marches on. The minimum wage has remained stagnant for decades while businesses are making record profits. Paying your employees is a business expense, and it should be an expense that keeps up with the cost of living. If you can't operate a successful business paying what you need for the assets required to run that business, employees included, you deserve to have to declare bankruptcy.
Sorry. I'm not buying it. It is so easy in this country to get the education and skills needed to make more than minimum wage. There are grants and scholarships all over the place. You don't need a four year degree to have good job skills. In fact, technical school training can sometimes gain you a lot more than a philosophy degree. You can be an auto mechanic or a long haul truck drive and still make a good living.
The problem is people aren't willing to put in the time and effort it takes to make a living wage anymore. If the best you can do is stock shelves at Wal-Mart at age 40, you need to rethink your plan and go back to school.
And I'd hardly consider the owner of a pizza shop an "oligarch." Without people like him, willing to take risks and work hard to get their businesses off the ground, there'd be no jobs at all.
Well, I'm not particularly concerned whether you "buy it" or not. I've stated facts. The cost of living and the cost of education have both risen significantly over the past few decades, and minimum wage has not kept pace. Business owners have therefore been paying less to workers than they should have for the past couple of decades. Even if the minimum wage was increased to $15, it would only bring it up to the level which it should be to keep pace with inflation, and that would not make up for all the wages people have lost over the past couple of decades while they were being underpaid. When I was college-aged it was possible to work full-time at a minimum wage job and pay your way through college, which is what I did, without student loans, scholarships or financial aid. I took a full course load with a double major and worked 40 hours a week at a convenience store. That's just not possible any more, because the minimum wage has not kept pace with the cost of living or the cost of education. And of course, it was also possible for me to get into college because I'm a relatively privileged person in this country. I'm white and grew up with two parents in a middle-class town with an excellent public school system near a major metropolitan area (New York). I was born in a big city (New York) so was not intimidated by it. And no, a pizza shop owner is not an oligarch, but if the business is unsustainable because the owner can't afford to pay his workers, then he "deserves" to go out of business. Does he stiff the pizza oven manufacturers? The furniture manufacturers? His suppliers? His landlord? He pays all those costs despite the fact that they've risen with inflation, and he raises his prices along with inflation. His employees are also a business expense, and paying them should also keep pace with inflation.
1807
« on: April 02, 2015, 18:09 »
 Granny Smiths are pretty popular here.
1808
« on: April 02, 2015, 13:49 »
So the salmon house will now rake in what used to be tips, and pay their servers what is probably substantially less per hour than they made with those before. There's no way they'd change their policy if it was better for their employees than it is for them.
.....
Ivars has always been one of the most progressive employers in the Seattle area
"pay their servers what is probably substantially less per hour than they made with those before" ? they RAISED their pay to $15 per hour
from the ivars website Insurance We like to make sure that our staff members lead healthy lives outside of work by offering insurance packages based on their position and length of service, including: ◦Medical, dental, and vision insurance ◦Disability and life insurance ◦Supplemental health insurance
Opportunities for Advancement At Ivar's, we believe in the potential of all of our employees and do everything we can to help them achieve their career goals. We provide comprehensive training and development and promote from within whenever possible. Financial Planning Many of our employees are not only looking ahead to their workplace future, but also to their financial future. To help with this planning, Ivar's offers a 401(k) Plan, investment planning services, and a Home Ownership Assistance Program
The basics of Ivars new policy will go like this: All employees, both tipped waitstaff and non-tipped back-of-house staff, will earn $15 an hour. (Currently, waitstaff make the state minimum wage of $9.47 plus tips, while back-of-house wages range from $12 to $15 without tips, according to Donegan.) Discretionary tipping by customers will be taken away, and instead all waitstaff will receive an 8 percent commission on sales, while back-of-house staffers will receive 9 percent of sales. ... Ivars will not make any changes to employees other compensations. The company will continue to offer full benefits to full- and part-time employees, as well as match contributions to 401(k) plans at 50 percent http://www.thestranger.com/food-and-drink/feature/2015/03/30/21976753/ivars-salmon-house-is-going-tipless
The article you link to points out that servers are now uncertain about their wages there -- and whether they will even continue to make the same amount, not more, remains to be seen. Also, the restaurant owner helped fund the anti-$15 initiative. And he's not interested in talking to his employees about their wages. "hes also fine with the possibility that staff may leave because of the new policy: 'If you as a server dont like the uncertainty of this system and you think you can do better, by earning all of the tips that youve earned in the past, and you want to be on your own, thats okay.'"
1809
« on: April 02, 2015, 08:36 »
"Forced" is the operative word there. Costco does pay more, and treats its employees with respect, and did so without being forced. Walmart (Sam's Club) did so only after succumbing to tremendous pressure after their labor practices were exposed. The Waltons are some of the richest oligarchs in the world. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walton_familyThe fact is that many business owners will pay only as much as they're forced to. Which is why we need to force the minimum wage up. The growing disparity between rich and poor in this country is unsustainable.
1810
« on: April 02, 2015, 08:19 »
In Utopia, $8/hour jobs are held by high school kids who are on their way to college and making a better living.
In America, the oligarchs buy government representation and lobby to pass laws that benefits themselves and their business interests, which has led to increasing disparity between rich and poor. The U.S. now has the largest gap between rich and poor of any industrialized nation. They also cut spending on education, making it more difficult for people to get ahead. This leads to adult heads of households struggling to feed their families on minimum wage salaries. It's more difficult to be upwardly mobile in the U.S. than in many other comparable economies.
Yes, business owners take risksbut one of the challenges of starting a business is being able to make that business profitable while paying a living wage to your employees. Insurance, equipment and other associated costs have not been kept artificially low while inflation marches on. The minimum wage has remained stagnant for decades while businesses are making record profits. Paying your employees is a business expense, and it should be an expense that keeps up with the cost of living. If you can't operate a successful business paying what you need for the assets required to run that business, employees included, you deserve to have to declare bankruptcy.
1811
« on: April 01, 2015, 12:35 »
So the salmon house will now rake in what used to be tips, and pay their servers what is probably substantially less per hour than they made with those before. There's no way they'd change their policy if it was better for their employees than it is for them.
And other businesses are also taking it out on their employees, because they are so angry that they actually have to pay a living wage. They saved tons of money over the years by not paying salaries that kept up with inflation...I have no sympathy for them.
1812
« on: March 30, 2015, 05:52 »
It is frozen. Got stuck around Valentine's Day a couple of years ago.
1813
« on: March 28, 2015, 10:12 »
It often feels to me like my new images aren't selling. So I picked a random day this month and added up new vs. old sales. I considered anything under 1 year old as new. To my surprise, more than half my sales were new images. That means they're actually selling better than my old images, because I haven't doubled my portfolio size in the past year. I've been more strategic about what I draw and how I keyword over the past year, though. (Or at least I think I'm being more strategic.)
1814
« on: March 26, 2015, 13:03 »
I got a bunch of 80 ones too. Weird....I never saw that amount before.
1815
« on: March 26, 2015, 12:06 »
Yes, we get large SODs from time to time.
1816
« on: March 25, 2015, 17:22 »
You can't really sign contracts with minors with few exceptions. Google is your friend.
1817
« on: March 25, 2015, 14:04 »
1818
« on: March 25, 2015, 08:00 »
Yes! Absolutely. Thanks for pointing it out. Typo fixed.
1819
« on: March 25, 2015, 06:25 »
First rule of marketing: it's easier (and cheaper) to get more sales from current customers than it is to get new customers. iS pissed off a huge number of buyers when they raised prices for small images, then ignored all the bad feelings and people quitting their service and just let them go. Now they want us to do the work attracting new customers, and in return we get the lowest royalties around. That sounds like a winning strategy.
1820
« on: March 24, 2015, 13:52 »
It could be you, it could be them. People have been having uploading issues there on and off.
1821
« on: March 24, 2015, 13:52 »
The link doesn't work. After waiting 30 seconds I gave up.
1822
« on: March 23, 2015, 15:23 »
Don't know if they sent it to everyone, but there are a couple of threads about it on the iS forums, so I think they expect everyone to do it.
1823
« on: March 23, 2015, 11:48 »
I don't know what the new Symbiostock will be or what it will look like, but in order to get people on board, in addition to the things already mentioned by others, there has to be a strategy for driving traffic to the sites, or at the very least least honesty about that being every man for himself.
My site gets very few clickthroughs from other sites in the network, and very few people go to another Symbiostock site from mine. My few sales started coming in when I began paying to promote posts on Facebook and when I included a link to my Shutterstock port in my slideshow. Again, few people click through to SS, but I think it gives visitors to my site some assurance that I'm legit and that my images meet some standard of quality.
I plan to invest a little more in Facebook marketing over the next few weeks to see what happens. But having a nice-looking site and good images is not enough....nor is the mutual linking to 100+ other sites.
Just my 2 cents.
1824
« on: March 23, 2015, 09:15 »
The third time I got an error that the EPS was missing the JPG. And the 4th time the vector went through and then I had all 4 showing in the editor. Had to delete 3 of them.
Certainly not working as it should.
Yes, this has been happening on and off. If you wait a bit the files will usually show up. PITA, though.
1825
« on: March 23, 2015, 08:07 »
When you upload illustrations to DT you can choose the "Stock Illustration" or "Stock Vector" categories when choosing your three categories. Usually I choose both, plus a third category. Some people may choose only one illustration category, saving the other two options for something else. It's up to the contributor, I think.
Pages: 1 ... 68 69 70 71 72 [73] 74 75 76 77 78 ... 116
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|