1926
iStockPhoto.com / Re: IMPORTANT NOTIFICATION:Payment Requests : UPDATE
« on: July 11, 2013, 12:26 »
So they now have 23,5 hours to complete PP payment, before cashout time is over.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 1926
iStockPhoto.com / Re: IMPORTANT NOTIFICATION:Payment Requests : UPDATE« on: July 11, 2013, 12:26 »
So they now have 23,5 hours to complete PP payment, before cashout time is over.
1927
iStockPhoto.com / Re: IMPORTANT NOTIFICATION:Payment Requests Temporarily Disabled« on: July 05, 2013, 14:54 »
That's just sad. What the heck are they doing over there at the IT department? Do they continuously fiddle with their code, unintentionally breaking things?
1928
iStockPhoto.com / Re: PP Sales Anxiety« on: June 30, 2013, 21:42 »
This has nothing to do with floods or 'busy times' at iStock, this is just a totally incompetent IT department.
admin edit: changed the post to be more politically correct. 1929
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock Creates First Silicon Alley Billionaire« on: June 29, 2013, 11:33 »I don't hate Shutterstock. In fact, I think it's the best microstock company out there. But being all happy for Jon because he hits the 1B $ mark is a bit silly while we contributors still make pennies for each download. Jon Oringer is not a hero or a god or a friend, so I couln't really care any less, as long as I make some money off of this. I'm not complaining about SS, I'm just not personally overjoyed by Oringer's success. 1930
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock Creates First Silicon Alley Billionaire« on: June 29, 2013, 11:01 »
I don't hate Shutterstock. In fact, I think it's the best microstock company out there. But being all happy for Jon because he hits the 1B $ mark is a bit silly while we contributors still make pennies for each download. Jon Oringer is not a hero or a god or a friend, so I couln't really care any less, as long as I make some money off of this.
1931
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Could this be the reasons he left?« on: June 29, 2013, 09:46 »That's a flagrant twisting of an innocuous interview if ever I saw one. No, that's humor, intended or not. 1932
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Changes to Main Collection pricing« on: June 28, 2013, 10:52 »Maybe I am boring but we need our stock agency! Microstockgroup agency! Not many contributors here have the time or resources to start up an agency, let alone run it. 1933
iStockPhoto.com / Re: New Royalty Rate Cut for Exclusives at Istock« on: June 27, 2013, 10:53 »In the istock facebook group Shaun just said the numbers are a mistake and that nothing is changing.Why did he announce it there first, rather than on the appropriate iStock thread? Because communication and Istock don't go together. Also, the fact that the bug was discovered on TUESDAY, but Istock decided not to inform the contributors, shows they truly don't give a *. Yeah, I know, Calgary was flooded and all, but come ON. 1934
iStockPhoto.com / Re: New Royalty Rate Cut for Exclusives at Istock« on: June 27, 2013, 05:03 »There has been no official confirmation as of yet, so it could still be a (very, very bad) copypaste error.Why did they need to change the chart? What was wrong with the one which was there already? Don't ask me, I don't work there ![]() 1935
iStockPhoto.com / Re: New Royalty Rate Cut for Exclusives at Istock« on: June 27, 2013, 04:57 »
There has been no official confirmation as of yet, so it could still be a (very, very bad) copypaste error.
1936
iStockPhoto.com / Re: PP Sales Anxiety« on: June 23, 2013, 21:06 »
So I've read and seen that two days ago, the Bow and Elbow rivers that run through Calgary have flooded, so the city is in a state of emergency and downtown is closed down.
1937
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Post Collection Changes Sales Performance« on: June 21, 2013, 07:09 »
It's way too soon to tell. Analyzing your sales performance after a single week is pretty useless, better look back on it after six months or so.
1938
123RF / Re: 123RF: fave and donate. Does it help to increase sales?« on: June 16, 2013, 05:57 »Thank you all for your answers. Yeah, I don't expect much from an agency that doesn't even understand what DPI means and that 72 DPI is not 'web resolution' or at all related to resolution. 1939
123RF / Re: 123RF Georank - Yuck« on: June 16, 2013, 05:48 »
I'm not going to bother with this Georank. Waste of time and I'm pretty sure it won't change anything in terms of (more) sales.
1940
Dreamstime.com / Re: another day, another "euwww" image at DT« on: June 02, 2013, 19:54 »
You actually VISIT the Dreamstime homepage?
1941
Panthermedia.net / Re: Panthermedia Vectors?« on: May 31, 2013, 09:29 »
Yeah, got the newsletter.
And also a subscription commission cut too: "Compared to international stock agencies, we have offered a much higher payout per download than our copmetitors while offering the same or smaller end customer prices. We cannot keep up this offer on the long run. While we are thinking about new and competitive subscription packages, we have to adjust our commission schedule to international standards. " In other words...unsustainable! But if the subscriptions do not count for vectors, then I might give it a try, even though their sales are very low. 1942
iStockPhoto.com / Re: istockreseller.com - Scam site?« on: May 29, 2013, 11:20 »Flippa should not allow this auction to proceed - it violates their terms as well. Yeah, I was thinking of reporting it. Anything to pester the owner of that crap site. 1943
iStockPhoto.com / Re: istockreseller.com - Scam site?« on: May 29, 2013, 07:53 »
So, what's the latest news on the process of stopping this scam site? Is Istock simply unable to stop them (which I can't believe) or have they stopped caring?
1944
iStockPhoto.com / 24h vector sale, 50% off« on: May 22, 2013, 06:18 »
Apparently IS decided to have a 24 hour vector sale, all credit sales 50% off. Not sure if this means we're getting 50% of the royalties, but if so, where can I opt out?!
1945
Pixmac / Re: Pixmac merges with Pond5« on: May 21, 2013, 14:54 »
Any news on the merging? I sent Pixmac an email but I haven't received any kind of response.
1946
Shutterstock.com / Re: What's left to do« on: May 20, 2013, 11:27 »
Stop worrying about changes in search algorithms, it's non-productive. All these search and Best Match discussions are a waste of time. Microstock isn't about short term, it's all about the long term. Just keep uploading stuff, and look back after a year or so to see what has sold and what hasn't.
1947
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Vector Royalty Rates Increasing« on: May 16, 2013, 04:59 »
What I don't understand is, about 6 months ago iStock made some changes which made it seem they wanted to get rid of indies (by favoring exclusives), and now, indies are being pleased at the expense of the exclusives.
1948
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Vector Royalty Rates Increasing« on: May 15, 2013, 19:35 »
I can hardly believe it. Good to see they're taking a step in the right direction.
1949
General Stock Discussion / Vintage / paper label vector designs trend« on: May 08, 2013, 08:07 »
I noticed there seems to be a trend of uploading and selling vintage label vector designs, as was pointed out in the latest Creative Brief email from Istock. I kind of like this style, so I was wondering, how are they created? I find it hard to believe there are suddenly lots of label designers out there who know how to recreate that authentic 19th century look. Do they simply scan old labels, do they copy them from other artists or are they created from scratch?
Some examples: - http://www.istockphoto.com/stock-illustration-21445708-vintage-labels.php?st=70af4db - http://www.vectorstock.com/royalty-free-vector/page-decoration-vintage-frame-collection-vector-1119498 - http://www.shutterstock.com/cat.mhtml?searchterm=vintage+label&search_group=&lang=nl&search_source=search_form#id=102916724&src=9HsWsZpfJ3XV6_IJDW1T1Q-1-61 1950
Shutterstock.com / Re: Public Info Status Broken!« on: May 07, 2013, 11:21 »
Yeah, my sales are down as well. What's happening?
|
Submit Your Vote
|