MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Minsc
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 ... 23
201
« on: July 26, 2017, 19:16 »
Good job taking this thief down. I ran into a few over the years and it's never a good experience. It's a good thing SS is quick to respond with portfolio take downs.
We used to send DMCAs to pirate sites. But recently we are talking about 8 major microstock sites and half of them not even respond to the takedown notices (including Getty/istock). Things getting worse. Agencies are not as responsive as they used to be.
Many microstock sites would only take down portfolios if they're hosted on the same site as your original images. You can easily prove that it's your work by having an lower Image ID, but they're hesitant if your work is not hosted on their microstock website. It's hard to prove what work belongs to who and who is the original owner. If they take down portfolios on a whim, you'd get a lot of legit portfolios taken down if thieves start requesting portfolio take downs.
202
« on: July 26, 2017, 15:03 »
Good job taking this thief down. I ran into a few over the years and it's never a good experience. It's a good thing SS is quick to respond with portfolio take downs.
203
« on: July 24, 2017, 23:46 »
Well, considering that FT downloads has dropped by about 10% in July, it isn't all that surprising. My downloads has dropped by about 10%, but I've been able to maintain my weekly position.
Could be the summer slump, or it could be FT losing some market share. We won't know for sure for a couple months.
204
« on: July 24, 2017, 18:05 »
You could have sent them the link to your portfolio and ask them to do a search within your portfolio. That would have made things simpler.
205
« on: July 24, 2017, 15:19 »
Did he bookmark the picture's detail page or a page with search results? Search results are constantly changing. If he bookmarked it a month ago, there's a good chance most the results have changed, especially beyond page 1.
206
« on: July 20, 2017, 19:32 »
i'm not concerned about competition..the problem is that thousand of poor files add to the mass of million poor files so when buyer search for terms they find everything but the terms searched...as you can see doing some easy research...and so buyer look only for popular photos killing any hopes to sell new files.
but i suspect most of people here don't live about stock but are only amateur.
You are clearly concerned about the competition. You may think your portfolio is godsend, but others will probably think it's mediocre and you're adding your mediocre images to an already saturated market that distracts buyers from buying good images. You need to stop complaining about everything, especially about new contributors. Don't forget that you were a newbie once who wanted some success in the Microstock industry. If your work is so amazing, you shouldn't be concerned with new contributors, unless you're really not as good as you say you are.
207
« on: July 17, 2017, 13:11 »
August is not that bad. It's better than July.
208
« on: July 14, 2017, 14:11 »
They need to backfill every images, so I think itll take a few weeks for it to propagate to their entire collection.
209
« on: July 14, 2017, 00:21 »
search " black caviar"
23000 images of a kind off food that is pretty expensive..... tab new....page of page of photos without a single gram of caviar.....search for popular first 10 page only caviar....if you are a customer what you do? search and got crazy or click popular and that's it? so if this is the panorama new images will struggle forever. in my opinion if ss will not check accurately keyword soon will be a total mess. they ask contributors to make a step forward quality in years while making giant step backward.
That's not black caviar. Who the heck serves black caviar with a metal spoon? What a disgrace! More like salmon roe dyed black or just plain black couscous.
210
« on: July 13, 2017, 15:41 »
I don't think there is any difference if you have keywords with comma or not, for example "red, potato" or "red potato" and buyer searches for "red potato"
I don't think it matters. I like to keep all my keywords separate as in red, potato. Some people just put the keyword 'potato' in there and calls it a day. There are over 550k results for 'potato' and 125K results for 'red potato'. I think it's obvious which one you have a better chance with.
211
« on: July 13, 2017, 13:16 »
Yes I don't see why buyers would enter particularly complex search terms though I do wonder about the DT info..itsnot unusual for me to get sales totally unrelated to the image ;-). Its a shame more agencies don't provide this information
SS does provide some info. Look at the Insights > Top Performers screen. Some buyers have used combination keywords to find some of my images...and that's all I'm going to share.
212
« on: July 12, 2017, 23:51 »
you're talking like you're a bigtime expert to all those contributors reporting a shortfall of 50% like you were with sh*tterstock longer than them . like as though they are green behind their ears and not know how to keyword properly. they were making lots of money for many years and then suddenly they forgot how to keyboard properly, except for you LOL
In the beginning, you don't need to keyword properly. All you had to do was upload, put in some basic keywords and everything sells like hotcakes without much competition. It's no different than websites in the early days of the internet that doesn't require meticulous SEO like today. With so much competition today, mediocre keywording just doesn't cut it anymore. I've looked at a lot of portfolios and majority of contributors don't know how to keyword properly. Most contributors rely on single keywords instead of longtail keywording techniques. Some use too few keywords. Many contributors treat keywording as a chore, so they put very little effort into it. So yes, you can still be inexperienced despite being in the game for a long time. It doesn't matter to me if some people think I'm some pretend expert. Results are the only thing that matters to me. I had 3 large SODs a few days ago, all from the same set. If the buyer didn't find one of my images, he wouldn't have bought all 3. Those sales could have gone to someone else. I see keywording as being in the right place at the right time.
213
« on: July 12, 2017, 13:32 »
New images sell, but contributors need to learn how the system works. You can't just upload something and then expect it sell when there are over 100 million images on SS. From what I've seen, new uploads does get some favorable treatment...they don't start at the bottom. They start somewhere above the middle of the heap and depending on whether it gets downloaded or not, it can rise or it can fall and make room for new images. Images with with a lot of downloads continue to occupy the top of the search results and rightfully so.
So for new images to sell, it has to be found. And for it to be found, it has to have good keywording. And for it to be downloaded, it has to have good execution and good commercial value. If it's missing one of the key ingredients, it won't sell well.
214
« on: July 12, 2017, 13:06 »
If you have 10 days without a single sale, you should re-evaluate your images first, instead of trying to come up with some conspiracy theroies.
Completely wrong recommendation if you have a selling port. What if I have a year of great sales then those same images stop selling altogether for 10 days? I am to attribute that to my portfolio? That's just funny man.
Exact.
And it is not always a question of the quality of the images. It can be a question of the the quality of the description and keywords. I had some good images not selling at all because the description was not accurate, and so the keywords. 6 - 8 months after I had edited the descriptions and the keywords these images have begun to sell. Why 6 - 8 months, this is a mystery for me, but I think that it is the time needed to the system to reindex the full portfolio (?)
As far as I know, new images and changes get indexed within 24 hours. It probably took a while for someone to download your image for the first time. When that happens, the ranking of that image changes and depending on how many competing images are there, your image can move up a lot or very little. Once it moves up the search results, it makes it easier for people to find, resulting in more downloads.
215
« on: July 12, 2017, 10:25 »
Downloads down a few percentage points, but weekly rank has gone up. It just means that sales have slowed slightly on FT/Adobe.
It's probably related to the Summer vacation season. July is one of the slowest months of the year.
216
« on: July 11, 2017, 16:28 »
I haven't noticed any change. If there was a shortcut to Today's daily sale on the Dashboard, I haven't found it. I usually go the the Earnings Summary and then click on the day to see the sales.
I recommend the app...so much easier to use.
217
« on: July 07, 2017, 15:24 »
There will always be newbies coming into the game. Imagine how other people felt when you first joined and they didn't want anymore competition.
I think everyone should get a chance to succeed or fail. Competition is part of life and no one can prevent it. We just have to do the best that we can.
218
« on: July 07, 2017, 15:09 »
https://us.fotolia.com/Info/ContactSend them a message here. Just let them know about the copyright infringement and who is infringing and they should respond fairly quickly.
219
« on: July 05, 2017, 16:49 »
I had this happened to me recently as well. Same reason for rejection.
There's a first for everything.
220
« on: July 01, 2017, 13:40 »
Not bad, but not great. 10% drop from May on SS. FT remained the same. A fairly sizeable drop on 123RF.
Overall a decent month. I don't think July will be any better now that we're entering the vacation season.
221
« on: June 30, 2017, 22:05 »
No offense friend, but your posts are getting a bit spammy. It's time to reign it in a bit and find other channels to market your book.
He means well. His intent isn't to take our hard earned dollars. He actually listen to our suggestions which is more that I can say about the folks that own the micro-stock companies 
I know he does mean well. I should have sent him a private message instead instead of making a public post. I do a lot of these types of projects as well...not Microstock books, but other stuff. It's not easy getting it to sell, so I know where he's coming from.
222
« on: June 29, 2017, 15:32 »
No offense friend, but your posts are getting a bit spammy. It's time to reign it in a bit and find other channels to market your book.
223
« on: June 19, 2017, 19:14 »
How?? 
Focus on the important aspects of microstock. Popular categories, commercial value and keywording.
224
« on: June 18, 2017, 15:06 »
Averaging about 4000 in the last few months.
225
« on: June 12, 2017, 19:07 »
If youre going to lie, learn how to lie better. If you exaggerate to an acceptable amount, people will believe you. If you exaggerate to an impossible amount, then people can laugh with you.
With contributors like Raw Pixel and African Studio, 35,000 is easily achievable.
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 ... 23
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|