|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Peter
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 ... 52
201
« on: January 07, 2009, 10:05 »
my sales at StockXpert are okay, almost as usual.
202
« on: January 07, 2009, 07:44 »
ok, thank you for your answer. Not that I am in a hurry, I just want to know everything is OK, and you know about "issue". I can wait even 10 more days, no problem, but I want to adress the problem. Yes. it is Moneybookers payment. Tnx for your answer! 
203
« on: January 07, 2009, 06:44 »
My sales are OK, as usual, but payment is not 
204
« on: January 07, 2009, 02:58 »
This is very strange now. I have requested payment (via moneybookers) on 19th December, and it is 7th january and it is still pending. Is it just me or is it present with others? I wrote to support, but they were of no use, replying me this: Thank you for your inquiry.
Electronic payment requests are usually processed within three business days.
Check requests are processed at the beginning of each month and the checks are sent out at the middle of the month.
If I can be of further assistance, please let me know. Thanks!
and I clearly stated that I am waiting payment for 15+ days. I know there was holiday vacations, but now they are over, and I woul like to ask another payment, but I cant before pending one is processed. I contacted StockXpert support again, hope this time they will be more helpful. Does StockXpert have forums of their own?
205
« on: January 07, 2009, 02:49 »
I still didnt get my money. I could ask another payput if this one was processed, but I cant I wonder what is happening?
206
« on: January 06, 2009, 03:38 »
iso 3200 at SS
207
« on: January 06, 2009, 03:34 »
My payment asked on 19. december 2008 is still pending Anyboy else waiting this long?
208
« on: January 05, 2009, 06:12 »
Okay.
LOL! 
209
« on: January 05, 2009, 05:34 »
ask NASA.
210
« on: January 04, 2009, 03:51 »
Doesnt agencies on holidays have less job? why would they need extra reviewers? people upload less on holidays, not more!
211
« on: January 03, 2009, 09:39 »
About a half of the latest batch were rejected due the reason: not in focus/ focus not where we want it blaah...
Images were food shots with shallow dof you can see any food magazine / book (shot with tilt&shift lens to maximize DOF). I was getting lot of this kind of rejections on StockXpert earlier this year but suddenly I got all my new images accepted (same DOF etc..). Had to change approach for SS images.
br, MJP
Doesnt agencies on holidays have less job? why would they need extra reviewers? people upload less on holidays, not more!
I like to think that all this sudden rejections from the sites, not just Shutterstock,
is due to the hiring of temporary help for the christmas rush.
You think that extra reviewers will help get the job done, but really, without training or supervision
you get the reverse effect ie. crap reviewers who can't tell the diff between creative focus
and out of focus; high key lighting and lens flare,etc...
I could go on to list the reasons, but i am sure you all got them this past month.
My guess : the same unqualified reviewers were hired by these sites.
I for one cannot wait till 2009 to normalize things when we get back to the old experienced reviewers.
212
« on: January 02, 2009, 03:42 »
I had 2 sales on DT, 7 on SS, 3 on FT. Which is very poor. Hope holiday vacation will end soon, and buyers are going back to work
213
« on: December 31, 2008, 04:00 »
I always use Photoshop quality 11 (12 is maximum)-
214
« on: December 29, 2008, 07:53 »
215
« on: December 29, 2008, 06:16 »
they are not on auto accept  I got few rejections as "simmilar image already accepted"
216
« on: December 29, 2008, 03:44 »
I requested payment ond december 19, still nothing. But reviewers are working just fine... only payment is late.... guess they are on vacation?
217
« on: December 29, 2008, 03:38 »
Why do you have to re-calibrate the monitor after certain amound of time? Isnt it enought to do it just once?
219
« on: December 28, 2008, 06:19 »
or even better bring those DVDs to missile-proof bunker
220
« on: December 28, 2008, 05:08 »
I save those, If some new agency GOOD (which is less likely to happen) pop up, so I can easily upload everything...
221
« on: December 28, 2008, 04:01 »
Backup on DVDs, and on external HDD. double backup.
222
« on: December 24, 2008, 11:11 »
of course FT give you a choice. You can opt out, if you are exclusive.
no, I dont find converison rates normal.
It should be:
1 credit = 1$ = 0.71Eur
and updated every 7 days as currecny fluctuate.
223
« on: December 24, 2008, 02:20 »
I sell for 0,36 on SS. Thats about the same, isnt it?
224
« on: December 23, 2008, 10:37 »
You should cancel it. You are making difficult to buyers to find my images. I whish more of you cancel your accounts, and I sell better due to less competition.
225
« on: December 21, 2008, 13:46 »
I think it will be OK. If you look at the poster from 2meters distance
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 ... 52
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
