MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - SpaceStockFootage
Pages: 1 ... 83 84 85 86 87 [88] 89 90 91 92 93 ... 98
2176
« on: September 03, 2016, 01:41 »
It needs to be split by content type
You can see the sample size by hovering this would make it even less statistically valid its only a rough guide to be treated with caution
You learn something new every day! Well there's 51 samples for Envato which is a lot less than most, but still a reasonable sample size. Looks like most are about 100 with around 150 for the big boys.
2177
« on: September 01, 2016, 23:32 »
I wouldn't trust the poll for one second since all it takes for something to drop from #4 to #15 seems to be one or two people voting.
Depends on what you're trusting it to do. I trust that it's an accurate portrayal of the data that's entered into it, and I have no reason to believe that the data that is entered into it isn't accurate. Although, trusting it to give an accurate portrayal of the sales value of certain marketplaces, has and always will be unwise, as you never know how many people are entering data for those sites. A few people doing well on one site might make it appear artificially higher, and likewise a few people doing badly on others might make it seem artificially low... when it's actually pretty good. To give a bit more weight to the list, it would be interesting to show "from X votes" or something like that.
2178
« on: September 01, 2016, 05:15 »
And this is the thing with micro-stock this is what makes all agencies work on the assumption that some lost some gained. If fifty contributors leave today they are easily replaced by another hundred tomorrow. This is why they can do whatever they want with us and all we can do is either put up with it or bail out at a loss. On this score micro-stock must be a heavenly paradise for an entrepreneur.
Maybe it was but I doubt more than a very few sites make much money.....when was the last new site to make any impact?
Creavorite?
2179
« on: September 01, 2016, 05:10 »
It's pretty difficult to separate out sales figures from different marketplaces... as you have one account with which you can sell on PhotoDune, VideoHive, Themeforest etc. So some income might be getting reported for stuff that isn't specifically photos or videos.
I know I report everything, including sound effects and 3D models, as well as my VideoHive content... but they're only a very small percentage of my revenue, 90% of my sales are on VideoHive. Although that does include After Effects templates. I guess that muddies the waters slightly.
However, if you have somebody who also sells Wordpress themes then that could skew the figures a bit, as Themeforest is the biggest selling marketplace at Envato, and although they are 'stock' templates, I wouldn't say they quite fall under the banner of 'microstock'.
So there you go. I see that Envato is currently down at 15th at the moment. I've just added my earnings though, so we'll see what difference that makes.
2180
« on: August 31, 2016, 01:43 »
S***... just noticed this thread is about ClipDealer. Had it in my head it was about ClipCanvas for some reason, so my comment applies to them, not ClipDealer. Sorry!
Although I've only had one sale at ClipDealer in the past couple of years. A few more for the year or two before that.
2181
« on: August 30, 2016, 10:47 »
Najbolja opcija, barem po mom iskustvu... payoneer!! Kolicina novca kojeg imas na racunu se loaduje na tvoj account i ne kosta nista, znaci, samo troskovi na bankomatu, kada podizes novac. Ako imas $100 toliko se loaduje na tvoj account i Istok nista ne naplacuje. Naravno kada ti pustaju isplatu, na tu kolicinu odbijaju Withholding Tax Od 30%.
My thoughts exactly.
2182
« on: August 30, 2016, 09:48 »
We'd probably have to pay PayPal fees though.
2183
« on: August 30, 2016, 02:17 »
I've had one sale in 2010, two in 2011, one in 2012 and one in 2013. Nothing since.
Based on the movement on the 'just sold' page, and if that page is showing all the clips that have been sold... then they're selling about 10 to 20 clips a week in total. I wouldn't be surprised if they shut up shop some time soon. I'd keep pushing for the payments while you still can, before they go the way of the Revostock.
2184
« on: August 29, 2016, 06:21 »
Maybe it would strengthen your argument if you didn't make sweeping generalisations regarding people you know nothing about.
2185
« on: August 29, 2016, 05:22 »
So you're saying that removing all of my portfolio from Envato, will result in my sales tripling everywhere else?
2186
« on: August 29, 2016, 03:20 »
I think the issue is mainly with the US side of it though... as US authors are having the most trouble with it, and all the withholding tax malarkey is due to the IRS. They are an Australian company, but they've set up in the US, which is where all their sales and payments are now handled... that's why it's subject to withholding tax.
2187
« on: August 28, 2016, 22:58 »
Why doesn't somebody just drop a quick email to the IRS and ask them to check if it's all aboveboard?
2188
« on: August 28, 2016, 21:15 »
Right, I think I get it. In the UK you just report what you report, no questions asked. Well, you'll sometimes get audited to check you're not making stuff up and you actually have documented evidence of your income... but it sounds like in the US, everything has to be accounted for. I.e. they match the incomings of one party with the outgoings of another.
I guess it makes sense from a balancing the books kind of thing.
It must get complicated though... I mean how far down does it go? If I have a receipt for a bunch of champagne for entertaining clients, will they then check with the nightclub's tax returns to make sure those bottles were sold at the price I have on the receipt and that the club are paying the right tax on them? Sounds a bit of a pain.
2189
« on: August 28, 2016, 12:16 »
I've read every single thread on the forums, and asked the same questions there that I'm asking here, and I still can't get a straight answer on how a company claiming that they do or don't do something has any bearing on my obligations as a tax payer. I must be missing something.
I earn X so I report X which means I have to pay X. Why would that be different with Envato as opposed Shutterstock or Fotolia or Pond5, for example?
2190
« on: August 28, 2016, 07:32 »
"The normal procedure is that if I receive a payment form any other Agency or site I issue a invoice according to the local legislation to them and thats it :-)"
Why can't you do that with Envato? I'm pretty sure most tax authorities don't care what some website says they do or don't do... as long as everyone is paying the taxes they should be. Envato may say you are the seller, but in the eyes of the tax authorities (well, the UK ones anyway) they are the seller. That's one of the reasons they are charging and remitting VAT. They wouldn't do that if they weren't the seller, or if there was no need for them to do so.
And I'm pretty sure something would have been done about it by now, if they were doing something shady. What's the benefit to Envato of doing it this way? Surely any financial gains could be easily obtained by a drop in commissions rather than by implementing a complicated, shady and illegal tax scheme. Isn't it more likely that they've looked into it and are doing all this because they're supposed to?
2191
« on: August 28, 2016, 06:39 »
[
So it's only the price your works sells for that's important to you? The volume of sales doesn't matter as long as they sell for a high price?
To me its total income from my portfolio that matters. Its nice to think someone thinks my work is worth $$$$ but in the end its total income that pays the bills. [/quote] That's the way I see it as well. 100% royalties on $200 clips would be lovely, but not if you only sell one a month. Likewise, 10% royalties on $10 clips would be pretty terrible... but not if you're selling 2000 a month.
2192
« on: August 28, 2016, 06:10 »
And do all the other stock sites provide you with invoices that have all these things?
2193
« on: August 28, 2016, 04:40 »
I guess the main reason is we are all making too much content too fast and dividing almost the same pie for growing number of contributors The number of big and medium producers who can afford $79 for HD is unlikely growing accordingly. Videohive may be a some sort of solution. I noticed there were sales from the countries which never appeared on my Shutterstock sales map (China, Russia) and the typical buyer profile there is surely different.
I will never sell anything at Videohive. It's too dirt cheap!! It's horrible for contributors!!
So if you got loads of sales and made about $2K a month there, that would be really horrible?
Yes, it is very horrible. People now can buy the same clips for $10 instead of $70+. It's bad. Simple math.
So it's only the price your works sells for that's important to you? The volume of sales doesn't matter as long as they sell for a high price?
The point is that you see good sales NOW on videohive because they undercut the market. Once everybody submits their stuff there your sales volume (not revenue or Profit, just the amount of files you sell) will be the same or maybe a bit more the amount of todays established sites (lets say three times more due to possible new markets, youtubes, low budget folks etc.?) .
However, once this was done the market is ruined and your revenue is minimal.
Beyond the pricing issue Videohive has. I simply think Envato is not a respectable company. For almost any EU resident it is almost impossible to work with them since they break about 6 laws with every invoice they issue in my name.
I do not respect them and do not understand why people support companies like this. I hope the IRS closes them down as soon as possible.
You know they've been around for ten by years, right? So they're pretty established already. I've been there for seven, and apart from a few very minor exceptions, my sales have increased every single month. Not sure about the laws they're breaking... from what I can tell, they're one if the few companies that don play by the rules when it comes to VAT collection and remission, and handling US withholding tax. I'm no international tax expert though!
2194
« on: August 28, 2016, 04:35 »
As always happens when a site sells dirt cheap a fee people join early and clean up on volume. Everyone else hears about it and signs up, the volume dries up. Other sites have to sell lower to compete. The race to the bottom continues.
That's not entirely true though, is it? Envato have been around for ten years... the same as Pond5, just a year less than Fotolia and three years less than Shutterstock. So all these other sites have had ten years in which to start 'selling lower to compete', and I've not seen any $8 clips on Shutterstock, and they seem to be doing ok.
2195
« on: August 28, 2016, 04:25 »
A Michelin starred chef earns more than a McDonalds chip fryer...
I think for the purpose of the analogy, we're looking at the turnover of the restaurants, rather than how much their staff are paid.
2196
« on: August 28, 2016, 04:21 »
I guess the main reason is we are all making too much content too fast and dividing almost the same pie for growing number of contributors The number of big and medium producers who can afford $79 for HD is unlikely growing accordingly. Videohive may be a some sort of solution. I noticed there were sales from the countries which never appeared on my Shutterstock sales map (China, Russia) and the typical buyer profile there is surely different.
I will never sell anything at Videohive. It's too dirt cheap!! It's horrible for contributors!!
So if you got loads of sales and made about $2K a month there, that would be really horrible?
Yes, it is very horrible. People now can buy the same clips for $10 instead of $70+. It's bad. Simple math.
So it's only the price your works sells for that's important to you? The volume of sales doesn't matter as long as they sell for a high price?
2197
« on: August 27, 2016, 21:59 »
I guess the main reason is we are all making too much content too fast and dividing almost the same pie for growing number of contributors The number of big and medium producers who can afford $79 for HD is unlikely growing accordingly. Videohive may be a some sort of solution. I noticed there were sales from the countries which never appeared on my Shutterstock sales map (China, Russia) and the typical buyer profile there is surely different.
I will never sell anything at Videohive. It's too dirt cheap!! It's horrible for contributors!!
So if you got loads of sales and made about $2K a month there, that would be really horrible?
2198
« on: August 25, 2016, 19:56 »
The money shows up on my balance straight away, but nothing shows on the actual sales figures or stats for a few days. Not sure if that's the same for everyone, but my total number of sales is showing as the same today as it was a couple of days ago. Takes a while to update for me, so can't see where they came from.
2199
« on: August 25, 2016, 03:52 »
Anyone had some crazy big sales on iStock today? I normally hit the $100 payout minimum once every other month, averaging about $60 a month. Today I've made $85 in the past few hours. I'm guessing it could be a bunch of extended licenses, but at 15%, that means somebody (or a bunch of people) have shelled out $566 on my stuff in one morning. Big spenders!
Makes me wish the same buyers had stumbled across my VideoBlocks portfolio instead! Anyway, hope there's no sales reversals or anything.
2200
« on: August 24, 2016, 02:38 »
I edit in After Effects. You're not really supposed to do that, but I'm weird.
Pages: 1 ... 83 84 85 86 87 [88] 89 90 91 92 93 ... 98
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|