|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Sean Locke Photography
Pages: 1 ... 83 84 85 86 87 [88] 89 90 91 92 93 ... 314
2176
« on: September 02, 2014, 15:33 »
Well, you can go by the idea that any microstock image with a regular license would be ok to use, and that's basically a dollar. Or go the more RM route, with a higher price, since you're having to custom write a license and deal with him, and visit Getty or Alamy to price it out. Maybe a hundred or two?
2177
« on: September 02, 2014, 13:41 »
Why are they even keeping up with the whole notion of "credits"? It's obviously just a big pain anymore, the way they slide through deals and change pricing and everything.
2178
« on: September 02, 2014, 12:46 »
This comment from IS paints the picture:
"Yep. I bet you're looking forward to getting a (slightly) higher percentage of the 15 credits (3 'new' credits) a Vetta image will cost - instead of the lower percentage of the 45 to 170 credits it costs now."
2179
« on: September 02, 2014, 12:33 »
It means that non-exclusive vectors currently sold for 15 or 12 credits will be all sold for only 5 credits (1 new credit). So our files will be devaluated. Great, amazing, just what I needed... 
But it sounds like credits are going up in price x5.
2180
« on: September 02, 2014, 12:29 »
2181
« on: September 02, 2014, 12:29 »
2182
« on: September 02, 2014, 12:22 »
"No More Pricing by File Size"
Woah!
2183
« on: September 01, 2014, 09:22 »
Ok, let me put this way:
If tomorrow Jon Oringer sell SS to those Getty idiots get whatever$ (get bored meanwhile) and create another SStocksy will you support him? I won't!
Bruce Livingstone selling IS made more damage to the MS industry then anyone else. What's next selling Stocksy and than again..........
Again, the business is set up as a co-op, which means that Bruce is not able to "sell it".
2184
« on: August 29, 2014, 13:17 »
Whoop Dee Doo. Passed the $10k mark. End of leveling up updates. Carry on. 
2185
« on: August 29, 2014, 12:16 »
Tell her to come up with her own ideas Obviously, essentially duplicating your ideas would be against the 'spirit' of the agreement. You each own your own shots when you press the shutter. Doesn't matter about the same studio, props or whatever. Of course, I couldn't care less how someone tries to take advantage of IS, so knock yourself out
2186
« on: August 29, 2014, 06:07 »
(i thought more coz' were not perfect images)
Maybe you should raise your standard?
2188
« on: August 25, 2014, 08:48 »
They're certainly a testament to good dental hygiene.
2189
« on: August 25, 2014, 08:31 »
2190
« on: August 25, 2014, 08:22 »
I'm guessing he's just some guy who doesn't know better:
"Hernani Larrea, Director of the School of Management and Agribusiness
BS in Biology and a Master in Teaching for Higher Education. With experience and expertise in food microbiology and postgraduate studies in health management issues. Advisor and consultant on food safety and security in local companies. Research on issues of health control with scientific publications in national and international magazines. "
2191
« on: August 25, 2014, 06:40 »
Boy, that's a lot of smiling people.
2192
« on: August 22, 2014, 04:15 »
I used five of my own images in a facebook ad campaign. All the sales appeared within a day.
2193
« on: August 21, 2014, 07:32 »
2194
« on: August 19, 2014, 15:22 »
It's funny, but all he did was write an email response back to them. Then he made a screenshot of it, and that's what he tweeted. Back and forths are always funnier.
2195
« on: August 18, 2014, 19:19 »
From what I've read here, it doesn't matter the figure - you won't hear back.
2196
« on: August 17, 2014, 13:31 »
"It seems that everybody is in the same put hole, but everybody talk about it in graphs and percents"
That's because people don't want to give income numbers, since it's really NOYB.
2197
« on: August 15, 2014, 14:29 »
ETA: iStock admin agrees with you btw.
Of course. 'cause I'm awesome 
2198
« on: August 15, 2014, 10:06 »
IS relevant part:
"You may not ... use the Content in connection with any goods or services intended for resale or distribution where the primary value lies in the Content itself including, without limitation, cards, stationary items, paper products, calendars, apparel items, posters (printed on paper, canvas or any other media) or other items for resale, license or other distribution for profit;"
Icons are not the primary value of an app.
2199
« on: August 15, 2014, 08:02 »
Regular RF license for icon use, no EL needed, afaik.
2200
« on: August 14, 2014, 09:11 »
Removing model releases from an image is a pain. The whole "checkbox images" and then use a pulldown to select an action, which pops up another window, which I have to hide, is annoying. It's just little things that bug me about it. I still do it, because I get some sales, so I'm not a hater, but I want to see them improve.
Pages: 1 ... 83 84 85 86 87 [88] 89 90 91 92 93 ... 314
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
