226
Cameras / Lenses / Re: Monopod
« on: September 28, 2010, 03:22 »
I could not understand Yuri when it came to the swivl mount that he was using, does anyone know what the name of this product is?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 226
Cameras / Lenses / Re: Monopod« on: September 28, 2010, 03:22 »
I could not understand Yuri when it came to the swivl mount that he was using, does anyone know what the name of this product is?
227
Bigstock.com / Re: the word Apple copyrighted?« on: September 24, 2010, 17:41 »
Again you have it all wrong, you cannot trademark the word "Apple". You may use the word injuction with other words, such as Apple Computer or Apple Electronics.
shotupdave 228
Bigstock.com / Re: the word Apple copyrighted?« on: September 24, 2010, 03:49 »
Here is the eact ruling on trademarks
How do trademarks differ from copyrights and trade names? Trademarks are identifiers of commercial products or services; business names, or trade names, identify a business for non-marketing purposes; and copyrights protect individual, original works of expression. The non-marketing uses of trade names include uses on stock certificates, bank accounts, invoices, letterhead, contracts, i.e. uses which identify the entity. Trade names can also be trademarks when used to identify specific goods and services. Copyrights do not generally protect individual words or slogans but will protect creative designs. Therefore, a logo design could be protected by both copyright law and trademark law. A copyright does not exclude others from developing similar or even the same design as long as the creation is independent from and the creator has not had prior access to the other design. Similar trademarks, however, might not be permitted if the public would be confused or if the value of a strong mark would be diminished or tarnished (dilution). The owner of a trademark is the first to use the mark in interstate commerce and requires continuous use in commerce to retain ownership. The owner of a copyright, depending on the circumstances, is either the creator or the employer and no publication, use or distribution is required. The copyright owner has rights for a term of 50, 75, or 100 years depending on the entity owning the copyright. The trademark owners rights are indefinite as long as the trademark is properly used and protected by the owner. 229
Bigstock.com / Re: the word Apple copyrighted?« on: September 24, 2010, 03:08 »
I will repeat my statement, you can't trademark the word "apple". You can trademark the company name of "Apple Computer". You can trademark of course artwork or any logo.
Years ago my brother and I owned a small computer shop names DataClub Computers. About three years after we started business we were contact by a compny that came from Australia that made software and thier name was DataClub Software. They actually sent a letter demanding us to change our name or they would start a legal case against us. We contacted our lawyer and he discovered that we were in business before them here in the United Staates witht that name and we were the legal owners of DataClub here. WE worked out a deal with them that they would pay our legal fees and we would allow them to sell software under that name but they were not to sell any hardware or offer computer services here in California. 230
Bigstock.com / Re: the word Apple copyrighted?« on: September 24, 2010, 00:28 »
Holgs, you cannot trademark a common word, that is why companies do long very intense searches to make sure that thier names do not mean anything in any land. Such as Kodak, Verox and Exxon. You may trademark the "Apple: if it is in a custom font or thier famous apple with a bite out of it.
231
Software - General / Re: Adobe on Ebay« on: September 16, 2010, 01:20 »
MacMall ids safe online, so is Amazon, Office Depot, staples. I would say any larger retail online stor would be safe to buy from.
232
Software - General / Re: Adobe on Ebay« on: September 15, 2010, 22:11 »
I purchased both my Lightroom and Photoshop directly from Amazon wiythout any proglens at all. Amazon right now is one of the largest distributors of software. If you buy from them or another large company such as MacMall you will not have to worry about it being pirated or counterfiet. Whil in China I was surprised on how many conterfeit software products I came across.
233
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Poll: Do you agree with IS structure change announcement?« on: September 08, 2010, 23:42 »
I agree that the commision should be based on acceptance but also on sales. I amazed of the quailty of photos that are accepted and passed.
I would not even tried to show this to any of my photo instructors when I was taking photo-101 25 years ago ![]() If pictures like this are constantly sent by a contributor they should be limited by the uploads or removed 234
iStockPhoto.com / Re: iStock changing royalty structure« on: September 07, 2010, 20:22 »
this has made a pretty good ripple in the pond, Got this on my FB page today
Fotolia @sjlocke Our Non-Exclusives start at 25% with no reset. Just saying... ![]() 235
iStockPhoto.com / Re: iStock changing royalty structure« on: September 07, 2010, 17:12 »
Sound like getty is taking lesson from Ebay and Enron. Corporate greed at its best or worst
236
Cameras / Lenses / Re: Does anyone use a Sony Cybershot?« on: September 02, 2010, 23:46 »
I carry a G10 when I do not want to caryy a full size slr. Its good because it still shoots raw files. I believe the s90 also shoots raw
237
Microstock GTG / Workshops / Events / Microstock Maeeting Los Angeles/Orange County Area« on: August 26, 2010, 22:43 »
After seeing the other people on Istock taking so long to get a meeting together, I think it maybe better to try to get on myself with other photographers not with Istock. So here goes anyone interested in having a shoot here in the very near future, please email me
238
Off Topic / Re: Will Yellowstone erupt any time soon?« on: August 25, 2010, 00:14 »
don't worry about it, according to another bunch of nut cases the worls is going to end in a couple of years
239
Off Topic / Re: California on Canada« on: August 24, 2010, 08:21 »I suspect that if you are talking about the average beach going teen, these answers are about on par. The surfers in southern California are legendary for their stupidity. Actually you will find that teenagers around the US will give the same answers. Saying our kids here that surf are stupid is just showing your ignorance. 240
General Stock Discussion / Re: How do you ask to sign Model Release?« on: August 21, 2010, 21:15 »
make a portfolio of your work about twtnry to thirty images. Just some real good 4x6 or 5x7's. By showing them that you are pro and also giving them a copy of the print, msot people will be happy to sign. Also be willing to give them a med res. jpeg. One of your outtakes so they can send a copy to mom or facebook. After school is in, I am going to run an post in craigslist that I am willing to shoot a casual portrait (environmental) for free if they willing to sign a release for stock photography
241
General Stock Discussion / Re: If you shoot RAW, how many photos can you process per day« on: August 21, 2010, 21:07 »
I can usually process a raw file to completed ready to upload in ten minutes. If it was a fine art print landscape file it can take me hours to do.
242
Off Topic / Re: Anyone else ever get an email like this?« on: August 20, 2010, 03:16 »
I have decided to quit photography and live on all the money I have won or inherited from relatives that I did not know. So far this week, I have recieved 1,000,000 pounds from Coca Cola and 13.5M from an uncle. At this rate I should be able to buy Microsft within two years.
243
Canon / Re: Canon G12 announced ... by accident« on: August 19, 2010, 16:38 »
Hopefully they kept the RAW mode and hopefully yhr e prices will start falling on the G11's. I wish Nikon would come out with a Rangefinder style camera. Looking at a LCD just does not make me feel likeI am serious photographer.
244
Photo Critique / Re: Which image would make better stock« on: August 19, 2010, 14:51 »
I like "B" as well, but I would tone down the white that is to the left side of the nurse's face. It is way to bright for me and distracts my vision away from the main subject matter. Also is it possible to get some more detail and color into the hand below. It seems a bit hot to me. Please forgive me if these have not been edited for the final submission.
Dave 245
Computer Hardware / Re: Network drive« on: August 19, 2010, 14:42 »
Another option is the drobos. They are not cheap but they are good. Since I am in the computer biz, I put together my own version of a drobo. I used a P4 3Ghz machine that a customer gave to us to recycle. Here is a link to hopw to build your own
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/storage/2010/07/23/how-to-build-a-nas-box/1 |
|