MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Pixart
Pages: 1 ... 90 91 92 93 94 [95] 96 97 98 99 100 ... 131
2351
« on: July 19, 2008, 11:24 »
The new schedule has not been introduced yet, but it will be "sometime after the middle of July".
It was likely credits purchased in 2007 but before the price increase.
2352
« on: July 18, 2008, 13:50 »
Looks like a huge improvement. ;DI'm looking forward to that flash uploader.
2353
« on: July 16, 2008, 20:40 »
Well, I just used the non-secure upload and 10 photos are missing. That doesn't make me feel too good.
2354
« on: July 16, 2008, 16:45 »
Every time I log in I get bumped out the minute I try to get anywhere. There is a message saying to go to a non-secure site - this has been here for weeks (months) - is it just me? I can't do ANYTHING without going to the non-secure site.
If they know something is broken, why hasn't it been fixed? At least it's a site I don't need to check stats at more than once a month.
2355
« on: July 16, 2008, 11:54 »
A couple days but sometimes it seems to take more than 24 hours after that to show up in the newest.
2356
« on: July 15, 2008, 11:22 »
2357
« on: July 15, 2008, 08:36 »
Fewer sales and sizes are much smaller also. Is it only bloggers buying photos this summer?
2358
« on: July 14, 2008, 15:21 »
How about this: I'll sell you a bunch of guaranteed-rejected images that you upload to any site. Rejection problem solved.
I hate to brag, but I've got loads of those myself
2359
« on: July 14, 2008, 11:31 »
I just got "7 out of 10" must be approved. Haven't seen that one in a while.... and there was only 3 in the batch.
2360
« on: July 12, 2008, 22:19 »
2361
« on: July 12, 2008, 22:15 »
Wow, Lisa - 100,000 dls, you are 10 times more productive than me.
I rememeber once you being very humble when I commented about you being a terriffic photographer or or a great microstocker or something to that effect.... The numbers prove that that the buyers agree with me.
Onward and upward!
2362
« on: July 12, 2008, 22:08 »
Check referrals. The only time I had a 10$ bonus I eventually figured out that it was a buyer. But either the money goes into your account before the referal appears or it takes you longer to find it. Your landing page should have a referred members down the right hand side.
2363
« on: July 12, 2008, 02:27 »
[Thanks tan510jomast! Glad my presence here is helping a bit. We've got quite the challenge ahead (getting trickier by the day - ahem * flickr+getty * cough cough *. Thanks for your support! 
I, likely others too, find it reassuring that you visit us here. Once you get ftp I will join the party.
2364
« on: July 11, 2008, 11:38 »
It's Fotolia where my subs growth is too fast. I guess I should just be thankful that someone is actually finding my photos on FT though.
2365
« on: July 11, 2008, 11:34 »
Oh boy, do I ever need to raise my expectations  Last season I thought this might be the year that I could make 10,000 at stock, but in order to do that I would have to actually grow my portfolio - something I seem unable to do when my business is growing faster than I expected. My earnings have stayed more or less flat for about a year. I think that a bigger goal for me in the immediate future would be to build a dedicated shooting room where the lights are always up and there's NO TOYS to pick up. But the chances of that happening are about as good as earning 10,000 per month.
2366
« on: June 29, 2008, 11:53 »
Slow, slow, slow. I open 123 and when it is loading I can check status of 2 other sites. Sales are the same. I make about .09 RPI /month there.
2367
« on: June 27, 2008, 11:49 »
For crying out loud Miz, you've fallen off that thin line you like to dance on again. Your attempt at humour is embarrassing to all of us.
2368
« on: June 27, 2008, 10:41 »
This is the one I'm about to use for some self portraits, which is based on the IS one.
Edit to your hearts content... 
I like your new avatar by the way.
2369
« on: June 27, 2008, 10:36 »
really?  when you think of it, if your image is good enough to win 25 bucks, i would keep it to myself as RF to earn with DT and other sites and still own the image. don't you think?
Your answer is mostly correct. If you enter that photo into a DT assignment though, it is as an exclusive image. So you can only earn from it on DT. I only entered one contest and I pushed the 25 bucks button. They refused the photo. I sent it elsewhere, and a few months later sent a cleaner version to DT again. It's definitely made more than 25 bucks. I think the quick 25 bucks is pretty great, but they are very specific about exclusivity, and you can't sell other photos from the same session anywhere else because of their exclusivity rules.
2370
« on: June 26, 2008, 10:56 »
Also... will the format change?
Think... beta... vcr... dvd... blueray...
Will our JPEGs have any value in 5 years?
2372
« on: June 23, 2008, 11:39 »
Wouldn't RPI be the most consistant?
I don't like that out of 10 poll. I never answer it.
2373
« on: June 23, 2008, 10:40 »
Maybe we are slave workers and it seems like we work for $1 per hour. But how many jobs have you had that you earn dividends after you leave? Just think of all those great Excel spreadsheets you set up for your department... you got paid to go to work that day, and they are still using your spreadsheets, but you are long gone.
Sure, in it's first year you only earned $1 per hour isolating that pencil. Maybe next year you will have an EL or a search engine tweak will boost your pencil and it will fly off the shelf. How many jobs can you earn a dividend over such a long period? Maybe life insurance sales. YUCK!
I don't shoot isolated pencils. I could do that stuff and have a lot of photos on line that sell a little - but over average might bring a nice steady income. I'd rather send in few of photos that I think will sell - and even then, I am not so good at guessing what might sell anyway, so maybe I should start photographing pencils.
Investing our time in stock photos is a bit like like investing in the stock market, isn't it? Hopefully less $ investment risked though.
2374
« on: June 19, 2008, 21:15 »
Usually people reference Amazon (or an online music store) when they talk about the Long Tail theory. Amazon has their best sellers, and they also carry niche topics that don't sell often and would just collect dust in a brick and mortar store. Each category sells very little, but there's millions of little categories like this and with the online store being able to have such an extensive catalogue, the combined sales from these poor performing categories make up the bulk of Amazon's business.
The Alaska photos that someone mentioned may not be best sellers, but you have to look at the earnings of such niche subjects over a longer period than a few months.
Microstock may be a lot like that. You will have your best sellers, but as your portfolio grows, the Long Tail will become more significant. It's an important factor to consider when you get the urge to "clean house" on your portfolio as well. Unless a photo is something that makes you groan now that you are more experienced, you should really keep it live.
2375
« on: June 19, 2008, 13:39 »
And considering that you also have a lot of anti-fans, and that you need to be loved or hated, but never ignored, for me you are the Paris Hilton of microstock!
OMG... never heard more accurate description! Well Miz, I faved you a couple years ago before I knew what a miserable sob you are
Pages: 1 ... 90 91 92 93 94 [95] 96 97 98 99 100 ... 131
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|