|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - noelbennett235
26
« on: January 07, 2023, 10:35 »
One AI I had not heard about before, Lexica art, built on stable diffusion and returning high end images, check the pricing though. You can begin to understand the 'game changing' talk about this new technology. https://lexica.art/
27
« on: October 12, 2022, 15:50 »
cascoly
Thanks
28
« on: October 12, 2022, 05:48 »
cascoly
Did you submit those Dale-E 2 images as photos or illustrations?
Thanks
30
« on: September 20, 2022, 15:34 »
Stats available now
32
« on: August 26, 2022, 05:20 »
I have been amazed at some of the results though some faces are very poor. It needs fairly detailed instructions to work. The more details the better. I would think that Adobe will need to up their game quickly. This software is still in its infancy. It can only get better. I think graphic designers are more likely to be affected than photographers but. presumably they will adapt to Dall 2 and incorporate it in thheir designs.
33
« on: August 16, 2022, 14:25 »
The image downloads as a PNG file. It can be upscaled in PS to the required size. It can also be saved as a JPG.
34
« on: August 16, 2022, 04:00 »
Has any stock agency decided to accept/reject AI generated images? Its only a matter of time before thay are inundated with them anyway.
35
« on: April 09, 2022, 14:56 »
I only upload images of birds/bees/flowers to Adobe. I have no idea what constitutes editorial there. It is hardly beyond them to clarify what they consider editorial to be.
36
« on: June 24, 2021, 07:33 »
what about a question like 'would you be prepared to buy other peoples images'?
37
« on: June 11, 2021, 08:04 »
Thanks sue, that explains it.
38
« on: June 11, 2021, 07:42 »
I notice that the visitors I get on FAA seem to come from a small number of cities in the US and China.
39
« on: April 16, 2021, 14:28 »
Adobe might be better out of the stock photo business. I presume their main business is software. If stock image prices continue to plummet, fewer photographers will need adobe software. A calculated gamble on their part, alienating their software buyers.
40
« on: March 11, 2021, 06:35 »
It's a great achievement.
41
« on: December 24, 2020, 13:43 »
maybe they think you are spying on them?
42
« on: November 23, 2020, 16:27 »
Has anyone here ever bought a portfolio and if so how did it work out.
43
« on: November 21, 2020, 11:33 »
zilch, zero, none
44
« on: November 03, 2020, 10:41 »
First of all, its a great tool, It really works well, even in relatively complicated skies. I doubt using them could affect your stock images-they are hardly revolutionary examples of the sky. The main issue you would run up against is the small number of sky examples provided in PS. However if you are concerned about that there is a way of adding your own skies.
45
« on: October 30, 2020, 12:59 »
Great achievement all the same. If I submitted those they would be rejected for being out of focus. Before I suspended my SS account I came to the conclusion that SS had gone to war with their contributors and yet this slips through.
46
« on: October 13, 2020, 13:17 »
Yay do accept editorial images try live chat if you are having difficulties.
47
« on: October 12, 2020, 15:50 »
Has anybody sold anything there lately?
48
« on: October 07, 2020, 16:54 »
49
« on: September 15, 2020, 04:39 »
As a matter of interest do portugese/Spanish newspapers use alamy?
50
« on: August 21, 2020, 06:50 »
The Today is 20 figure is over $1 less than the Istock figure but I think the number of images sold is higher than the istock figure.
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
