MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - sgoodwin4813

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 ... 55
251
Off Topic / Re: Trump in Putin's pocket
« on: July 21, 2018, 06:45 »
Cathyslife, why don't you take your conspiracy theory nonsense elsewhere and leave the discussion to the adults?  Believing "testimonials" from uneducated idiots, publicity hounds and hucksters on internet chat rooms will lead you down the wrong path every time.  If you don't believe the Mayo Clinic then you probably don't believe in vaccines either.  Sorry to be so blunt, but I get really annoyed by people parroting pseudoscientific nonsense based on superficial internet "research".  Try to chill out, have a glass of wine and relax and maybe you will enjoy life more.  You seem to be full of anger - that is much worse for you than taking statins.

Back to the OP: Yes, it is becoming more and more obvious that Trump is completely in Putin's pocket.  Whether this is part of some brilliant long-term plan or merely a pathetic attempt to save his own skin we don't yet know for certain but I strongly suspect the latter.  What we do know for certain is that Trump is one of the biggest liars ever, especially about his sexual infidelities.  Why he is allowed to continue when others are being fired or resigning their positions for even a hint of sexual impropriety is truly disgusting.

252
Off Topic / Re: Trump in Putin's pocket
« on: July 20, 2018, 21:48 »
According to his doctor, he is taking statins. That crap messes you up. The brain uses 25% of the cholesterol your liver produces. Statins stop your liver from making cholesterol. Guess what happens to your brain...alzheimers. Guess what happens to your muscles and nerves. Pretty soon you cant walk.

This is not true.  There is a small but significant chance of very serious side effects - e.g., neuropathy of various kinds and liver damage - but the incidence is very low and those mainly appear in people who are not like Trump (female, small body size, drinking too much).  Statins actually may protect against Alzheimer's, although the data are not clear on that.  Trump's problems are very unlikely to be due to taking statins - to me it looks much more like the early symptoms of dementia.  Here is a list of early symptoms (https://www.healthline.com/health/dementia/early-warning-signs) - Trump exhibits all of them at various times, most people his age show none of them.  Trump's father had Alzheimer's and his poor diet and lack of exercise increases his risk.  Reagan clearly had symptoms of Alzheimer's by the beginning of his second term and possibly earlier, Trump is showing the same already.
I don't think that's true either.  My stepfather didn't have many problems until he started taking statins.  They were really bad for him.  He went from playing golf regularly, to struggling to walk short distances.  The doctor insisted it wasn't statins doing it but in the end, he stopped taking them and was much better after about a month.  He never did go back to golf and his mind went a few years later but that might be coincidence.  I've heard that lots of men have had similar problems with statins.  A change of diet is much better for you than experimenting with a drug that can do harm.

My mother also had a terrible time on statins. Terrible headaches and feeling "cloudy headed" all the time, bone and joint pain, really unbearable.

Sgoodwin4813 acknowledges the chance of awful side effects, some even similar to alzheimer's. We were talking specifically about actual Alzheimer's though.

Thank you for pointing out that I mentioned the side effects.  Statins are great for lowering cholesterol, however they do have a small but real risk of very serious problems.  There also seems to be an unknown genetic component - most people can take statins without problems, but others have bad reactions, presumably due to their different genetic backgrounds.  Anyone taking statins should be aware of the potential side effects, get checked every few months and stop taking them if they have problems.

I have taken statins for more than 15 years, so far with no problems.  I did not take them for more than two years after they were first prescribed due to fears about potential side effects, and only started after I read enough scientific studies to convince myself that the potential for side effects was an acceptable risk.  My father also took them for many years without problems, so I figured my risk for negative genetic interactions was probably low.  They quickly lowered my cholesterol level (which was not too high but enough to get a doctor's attention) into the range doctors like to see, which I was not able to do with diet and exercise alone.  Have they improved my quality of life and increased my lifespan relative to what they would be without statins?  I have no idea, and there is no way to know for certain.  I get my liver enzymes checked every six months and get nervous every time I have muscle pain, but so far no problems, and any pains have resolved themselves in time, just like they did before I started taking the statins.

When I mentioned to a colleague that I was taking statins, he was jealous and said he wished he could take them for the cognitive benefits.  That was the first I had heard about that, but when I looked into it there have been some studies showing improvements in memory and such, presumably due to better blood flow to the brain allowing plaques to be removed more efficiently.  I'll take it if that's true, but I don't think anyone recommends taking statins for the potential cognitive improvements.  The problem is that it is impossible to make firm conclusions from a small number of experiences, and difficult to obtain the large amounts of money needed for proper clinical trials.  If anyone is really interested in statins the Mayo Clinic, e.g., here (https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/high-blood-cholesterol/in-depth/statins/art-20045772), is a good place for look for a sober, objective assessment from a site that is not trying to sell you anything.

253
Off Topic / Re: Trump in Putin's pocket
« on: July 18, 2018, 22:47 »
You would argue I was wrong no matter what I showed you.

That's a strange comment from someone who knows nothing about me.  I'll happily agree with you if you show me some convincing support for your opinions.

Do your own research. I have, since Feb. 2017.  Here are some people to read if you are really interested...Dr. David Diamond, Dr. Aseem Malhotra, Dr. Barbara Roberts, Dr. Stephen Sinatra.

Interesting if you call that research.  None of those people has done any research on the effects of statins, they mainly seem to promote diet as the cure and and the current fad of sugar as the main problem.  Certainly diet is important and too much sugar is a problem, but if you actually did any research about studies on diet you would find that they are even more contradictory than the research on statins.
 Diamond is a professor of psychology so is out of his element, the others at least are cardiologists.  You think research paid for by companies that produce statins are a problem, but apparently it doesn't bother you that all of the people you cite above are publicity hounds pushing their own agendas.  Roberts is trying to sell a book where she has to make dramatic statements to make sales, Sinatra seems like more of a huckster than a cardiologist.  It doesn't make you wonder when someone is promoting a book or their own health products?  Diamond is a psychiatrist and I'm not sure about Malhotra.  Those people all are pushing the Mediterranean diet and lower sugar.  Recent studies have shown that people living in the Mediterranean get more exercise and have strong community connections and that those might be more important than diet for heart disease.  If the sum total of your research is looking things up on the internet then you have a long way to go.  I think you are experiencing confirmation bias by finding people who are peddling what you want to buy.

Whatever is wrong with Trump is speculation on both our parts. My guess is just as legit as yours.

Certainly neither of us knows what is wrong with Trump for sure, but he definitely exhibits all of the early signs of dementia as they are listed according to the Mayo Clinic, so my opinion is more than speculation.  If you look at videos of Trump from just a few years ago (which I am not recommending) and compare them to today you can see a marked deterioration - this has been noted by many others besides me.  People who worked on his campaign have also allegedly said he has early dementia.  If I am correct it will become painfully obvious in the future, but I think it is pretty obvious already.  I don't think he is bad enough yet, but at some point Congress should invoke the 25th amendment and demand an independent mental and neurological exam instead of the sham exams by joke doctors we have had previously.

254
Off Topic / Re: Trump in Putin's pocket
« on: July 18, 2018, 06:39 »
According to his doctor, he is taking statins. That crap messes you up. The brain uses 25% of the cholesterol your liver produces. Statins stop your liver from making cholesterol. Guess what happens to your brain...alzheimers. Guess what happens to your muscles and nerves. Pretty soon you cant walk.

This is not true.  There is a small but significant chance of very serious side effects - e.g., neuropathy of various kinds and liver damage - but the incidence is very low and those mainly appear in people who are not like Trump (female, small body size, drinking too much).  Statins actually may protect against Alzheimer's, although the data are not clear on that.  Trump's problems are very unlikely to be due to taking statins - to me it looks much more like the early symptoms of dementia.  Here is a list of early symptoms (https://www.healthline.com/health/dementia/early-warning-signs) - Trump exhibits all of them at various times, most people his age show none of them.  Trump's father had Alzheimer's and his poor diet and lack of exercise increases his risk.  Reagan clearly had symptoms of Alzheimer's by the beginning of his second term and possibly earlier, Trump is showing the same already.


LOL You are so, so very wrong.

Believe what you want, but saying people are wrong and providing no evidence is not very convincing.

255
Off Topic / Re: Trump in Putin's pocket
« on: July 17, 2018, 22:07 »
The seeming simplemindedness of some of his speeches is aimed at his followers. "I love the uneducated," as he's said. He does it purposely...saying pretty much nothing by rambling incoherently. And they eat it up and think he's saying something meaningful.

Yes, I agree, the simplemindedness is often intentional and directed at his followers, but the incoherence, repetitiveness, forgetfulness and difficulty walking are more likely early symptoms of dementia.  Due to family history I am acutely aware of the symptoms of dementia and Trump is definitely showing them.

256
Off Topic / Re: Trump in Putin's pocket
« on: July 17, 2018, 22:03 »
According to his doctor, he is taking statins. That crap messes you up. The brain uses 25% of the cholesterol your liver produces. Statins stop your liver from making cholesterol. Guess what happens to your brain...alzheimers. Guess what happens to your muscles and nerves. Pretty soon you cant walk.

This is not true.  There is a small but significant chance of very serious side effects - e.g., neuropathy of various kinds and liver damage - but the incidence is very low and those mainly appear in people who are not like Trump (female, small body size, drinking too much).  Statins actually may protect against Alzheimer's, although the data are not clear on that.  Trump's problems are very unlikely to be due to taking statins - to me it looks much more like the early symptoms of dementia.  Here is a list of early symptoms (https://www.healthline.com/health/dementia/early-warning-signs) - Trump exhibits all of them at various times, most people his age show none of them.  Trump's father had Alzheimer's and his poor diet and lack of exercise increases his risk.  Reagan clearly had symptoms of Alzheimer's by the beginning of his second term and possibly earlier, Trump is showing the same already.

257
Off Topic / Re: Trump in Putin's pocket
« on: July 17, 2018, 07:05 »
The Russians have been cultivating Trump as an asset for more than 20 years.  It makes you wonder what they have on him that he would debase himself so much - proof of his money laundering most likely, but who knows what else.  Of course he will trust Putin and disparage US intelligence - Mueller's investigation points to the collusion that got him "elected" in the first place.  We have been in a de facto cyber war against Russia (or at least they are against us - not sure if we are fighting back).  Colluding with an enemy during wartime is the definition of treason.  Trump is a traitor and should be impeached immediately as he obviously is not serving the interests of the US.

The most disgusting thing is not Trump, it is his Republican enablers who allow this travesty to continue.  If a Democrat had pulled any of the nonsense Trump does on a daily basis the Republicans and their Fox propaganda outlet would be calling for impeachment immediately - and rightly so.  Yet Trump continues to destroy everything about the US and the Republicans do nothing.  They are still planning congressional races based on who is the biggest Trump supporter.  Trump's base appears to be a bunch of brain-dead morons who will support him no matter what.  This is the biggest threat to the US in my lifetime and when you look at similar phenomena worldwide makes me wonder whether democracy is a tenable form of government over the long term.  I hope the Democrats can get their act together and come up with a strategy for helping the country before it is too late.

258
Dreamstime.com / Re: Dead dead and dead
« on: July 12, 2018, 20:47 »
"There's a big difference between mostly dead and all dead. Mostly dead is slightly alive."

    Miracle Max in the Princess Bride

Glad to know that DT is slightly alive after all!  (They are hanging in there for me, although all dead the past few days).

259
Shutterstock.com / Re: Understanding Editorial /commercial
« on: July 07, 2018, 08:50 »
Did you make sure there are no bank names, Coke signs or anything like that on the buildings?  I had some rejected once for the same thing and when I looked carefully found I had missed an NBC logo on one of the buildings in the background - they went through once that was removed.  Either that or they have some new inspectors as others suggested.

260
General Stock Discussion / Re: RDP IS vs SS vs ALY
« on: July 04, 2018, 10:01 »
Mine were:

SS: $1.03
iS:  $1.13
AL: $13.92

But, like ZT, I made almost ten times as much on SS as on AL.

261
Just got mine, too.  Goodbye Stockxpert.

262
Canva / Re: Canva Sales for Multi-Use License
« on: June 26, 2018, 21:46 »
For the past two months I have been getting one every 30-40 sales - not too often but they do make a difference in the bottom line.  Never had an EL.

263
I had not been paying attention, but I just checked and through March I was getting lots of SODs every month and starting in April they dropped off to about 20% of what they were before.  I hadn't noticed because until this month I was getting enough high-value SODs ($40-$75 range) to keep the money in there.  This month is terrible, but June is usually a bad month so not too surprising.  July is usually my second-worst month so not looking forward to that.

264
Dreamstime.com / Re: Dead dead and dead
« on: June 16, 2018, 09:22 »
Comparing RPI across agencies is actually useful because it tells you where to focus energy.  If I have fewer images on an agency with a high RPI then I will definitely want to increase my portfolio size on that one.  I try to make images that will have the greatest appeal to the agencies with the highest RPI as those are likely to get the most bang for the effort.  Of course those are also almost always the agencies that make the most money, but RPI is very useful for helping to decide whether to continue with a new agency - they are only worth bothering with if they have a high RPI.

DT has been hanging in there for me.  For the past year or so I have been getting runs of multiple downloads of similar images from the same topics - often almost everything I have submitted on them.  No idea for what purpose, unless somebody is just making databases for future use.  I have a lot more on most them that I could submit so had better get to it while the going is good.  So far this month DT is at number three, ahead of FT, although I expect that will change by the end of the month.

265
SnapVillage (Corbis) - although its nickname of CrapHamlet (don't know who coined that, but kudos) is almost worth it

Was it Corbis that paid per upload to contribute for a few months? I remember enjoying that little chunk of change.

I think that was the Veer "Dash for cash" or something like that.

266
DepositPhotos / Re: $0.09 commission for On Demand sales
« on: June 01, 2018, 08:16 »
I had two ten-cent on demand sales this month.  Wrote them to ask about that and also to say that I want to opt out of any that are that low.  I assume they will give the same response as they have to you all and will let me opt out of those.  And just when I was considering starting to upload to them again after a couple of years ...

267
General Stock Discussion / Re: So How was your May?
« on: June 01, 2018, 08:09 »
May ended up being OK - at my target earnings amount, no complaints.  It was due to more ELs than usual, clip sales, and a $75 SOD on SS that topped it off.  BME on FT thanks to a rare EL there as well.  Canva good, DT hanging in there - I have been getting downloads of multiple images in the same series there for the past year or so, good thing they dropped their well intentioned but ultimately wrong similars policy.  Other sites mostly dead.  Had two 10-cent sales on DP that I have written to ask about.  Have been hanging in there overall and especially at SS for the past six months or more by rare high-value sales - the bottom will fall out without those as sales volume on all sites except FT is lower than in the past.  I should start uploading again to a few of the sites at least.

268
I am in the same situation but I want to change it from GBP to dollars.  As far as I know it is not possible, even though that should be an easy change for a programmer to make.  If you find a way please let us know.

269
I just had a nine-center too.  Too lazy to write them - will wait a few days to see if they auto-correct.  Will be interesting to see if they let it slide if you don't write them.

270
123RF / Re: Again late with 1099 this year?
« on: April 06, 2018, 19:39 »
That is inexcusable.  They asked for a delay so all the rest of us are supposed to put off our returns due to their incompetence?  It's not like taxes come as a surprise every year.

271
Off Topic / Re: The Prisoner
« on: April 04, 2018, 22:40 »
Quote from: Shelma1
Cultural differences my behind. Black people were forced here (the U.S.) as slaves and have been purposely under educated and locked up in for profit prisons for minor offenses because if slavery can't be legal, then you can at least make laws to target them pretty specifically, red line districts to keep them from living in better neighborhoods with better schools, and keep as many as possible locked up and out of the workforce and the voting booths (where they'd vote for liberals).

When you say "we," who are you referring to, exactly? You write as if you live in the U.S., but you actually live in Canada, a country with a much, much lower incarceration rate.

Valid points Shelma, but you make it sound like a conspiracy.
I don't think that the system has been purposely designed to oppress minorities.
Instead, the majority wants politicians to be "tough on crime" and the consequence is a system with outrageous fines and prison sentences for minor offences.
Personally, I had to pay $85 for running in the park after sunset. It's not an issue for me, but people close to the poverty line might have real trouble paying it. As seen in the stories I provided links for, there are cases where fines are significantly higher, also for minor offences. Failure to pay those fines can lead to jail.
Maybe the reasons behind the "tough on crime" expectations for our politicians derive from the general feel of not being safe Americans have. Maybe it is linked to the wide availability of guns, maybe it is linked to the exacerbated discourse related to terrorism, etc.
So it is not really a conspiracy, but rather a logical consequence of deeper flaws in our system.

I used to feel that way. Then I did some reading and found it actually is a conspiracy, unfortunately. The U.S. government has absolutely been involved in efforts over the centuries to purposely keep black people from being properly educated; has given only white G.I.s loans and access to decent housing after they return from war; has crafted laws and longer prison sentences that target specific forms of drugs (crack cocaine rather than powdered, for example, because blacks used more crack and whites more powder); has redlined housing districts to exclude blacks from decent neighborhoods, basically forcing them into ghettos where they are surrounded by crime and receive sub par education.

Studies have consistently shown that blacks (and women) receive worse health care than white men. Black people are arrested more often than white people for drug offenses, even though whites are more likely to use drugs. They receive longer prison terms for the same crimes. They're shot to death by police for all kinds of nonsense. Banks purposely charge them outlandish fees while giving white people free banking. Basically, the white establishment does everything it can to keep black people down. It's purposeful, 100%.

I don't deny the existence of racism in America. It is very much present, no doubt about this. But I am very certain that racism is present in many other countries, where it is not acknowledged. Anti-Gypsy racism in Eastern Europe comes to mind, as an example. Islamophobia (although this is not racism, in theory) is pretty much present throughout Western Europe and beyond.
Some might not even realise the level of the racism in their countries, because they never had the chance to meet and interact with people of a different race.

Yet, most of this countries point fingers towards American racism, a lot being oblivious to what's going on under their nose. This is because racism in America is constantly and openly debated, in the news, in politics, etc.

Having said that, I rather believe that we deal with a vicious circle, where poverty leads to more poverty, because of a broken system. A system where we allow government too much power, power to setup stupid, arbitrary laws, excessive fines and a plethora of economical barriers impacting mainly the poor, preventing them to express their true potential and to grow out of poverty.

I wish you two were in office rather than the ignorant bozos we have instead.

272
Canva / Re: Canva
« on: March 26, 2018, 16:51 »
No change for me.  Hopefully it is just a reporting glitch.

273
You've answered your own question!

274
123RF / Re: Is this why our ranks were lowered?
« on: March 21, 2018, 21:16 »
I got the same message.  I'm not exactly sure what it means because I don't know the old pricing but does this mean they are selling ELs for 6 credits?  If so, it is time to cut the cord - already stopped uploading but maybe time to ditch them completely.  They now earn so little they won't be missed.

275
Canva / Re: Canva
« on: March 21, 2018, 19:13 »
Click on upper left.  Go to Account settings, then Admin, then View portfolio.  Might take a week or two for them to show up.  Good luck!

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 ... 55

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors