MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bunhill

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 ... 62
276
General Photography Discussion / Re: RAW vs JPG vs CAM
« on: January 04, 2015, 05:56 »
What I find weird is that on the camera settings there is not much to set in terms of colors. I always use the landscape setting but that setting only has some increased sharpness.

As others have noted, in Canon DPP you can apply an interpretation to the data which mimics what the camera does when you shoot using eg the Landscape, Portrait etc settings. You can do the same (roughly similar anyhow) in Lightroom by using the Camera profiles (profile drop-down option in calibration settings). Lightroom and ACR include alternative optional profiles which mimic alternative built-in camera settings. There are also lots of third-party .dcp profiles available which provide alternative processing. Different from presets - though well designed presets typically also include their own camera profiles (looking at decompiled profiles I have noticed that some but not all also include a tone curve - within the profle).

In Lightroom (eg): If you begin by applying a different profile - eg Camera Landscape in Lightroom - you will get an image with a completely different interpretation of the color data. Most particularly the hues. The image will look completely different compared with the default Adobe profile. But the all of the other Lightroom settings (eg hue, saturation etc) will still be at their defaults. ..... because the slider values of these settings are relative to where you began. And you begin somewhere different when you apply a different profile.

Profiles mimic camera settings (eg Landscape, Portrait etc). The camera does not expose an interface to (ie control over) the majority of different ways in which the raw data can be interpreted (even a raw converter really only offers control over facets of a virtualised abstracted model of the data). Choosing the camera's Landscape setting is just like applying a profile in Lightroom (though this will also optionally additionally affect the 'sharpness' setting as noted in the OP).

Profiles define the way in which the raw data is initially interpreted. The color values. Most particularly the hues. The camera's Landscape/Portrait etc options do the same. Which values match different colors etc. Profiles are typically .dcp files. Adobe offers a free profile editor which can be used to create alternative profiles when used in conjunction with a calibration chart. We can also decompile existing .dcp files into XML to see their structure. A decompiled profile will be hundreds of lines long. There is a huge number of specific values - far more than either the Camera menu or Lightroom could usefully allow us to individually tweak.

There is no such thing as an original neutral raw image. As if that implied that a file had not been manipulated or processed. The default settings in any raw converter produce an image which is a manipulation of data. There is no such thing as neutral processing. The same as there was no such thing as definitive film - just different chemistry. Velvia was relatively more saturated and intense than Portra. Neither was accurate.

277
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Sales
« on: January 03, 2015, 14:55 »
The issue with some macros is if they would accept files as RM which had previously sold as RF.
If they hadn't sold, it wouldn't be an issue.

Yep. And I believe that there may be an additional potential issue. Which is that pulled content may still be on distributor / sister sites. Content takes ages to be pulled. Eg - The last time I looked there were long ex iS exclusives (years now) who still have E+ collection content on GI.

You would not want to be uploading old content as RM whilst somewhere else it is still being sold RF.

Personally I think that it is bonkers to move RF content to RM. Just shoot something new. Especially given that all RF sales can still be used again forever. I think you kind of have to let old stuff go and shoot new if you decide to move on.

278
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Sales
« on: January 03, 2015, 12:50 »
I'm now starting to remove my higher value images and will move them to macro.

Does the Exclusive contract allow that or are you quitting Exclusive ?

279
Alamy.com / Re: Payment postponed to February?
« on: January 03, 2015, 12:33 »
As it's a weekend I haven't heard from Member Services yet.

But my 'My Alamy' homepage now shows as
"Current Cleared Balance: $0
We'll pay you once your balance is over $75."

I'm paid directly into my Bank Account and it isn't showing yet, but I'll assume for the moment that it's 'in transit'.

Doesn't it show as paid in 'View your account balance' ? In My Alamy.

280
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Is iS dead now?
« on: January 03, 2015, 05:20 »
No no he's not dead, he's, he's restin'! Remarkable bird, the Norwegian Blue. Beautiful plumage!

281
Alamy.com / Re: Payment postponed to February?
« on: January 03, 2015, 03:36 »
I reached Alamy's payment amount in December, the website said it would be paid on January 1. As a long time Alamy contributor, it was normal. Today I checked again, it said it would be paid in February 1, 2014. Does anyone know what's going on?

My cleared funds balance is showing as paid yesterday, 2nd Jan - in 'View your account balance'.  I have not actually received the money - but payments previously have taken some days after being marked as paid to be processed to my Paypal account. That is normal.

My guess would be that the Feb 1st date will refer to your new cleared funds balance.

282
iStockPhoto.com / Re: IS removing crucial keywords
« on: December 28, 2014, 09:23 »
trying to streamline language is a gargantuan task

In many cases there would surely be difficult to resolve [many]>-<[many] and recursive relationships within meanings. It may also take an extra layer of overheads to reverse translate search queries into their CV relationships. I wonder whether this sometimes contributes to the slowness of the site.

Possibly the CV is a legacy of a different business - designed for a site with many fewer images which were keyworded by the bureau. In those days it would have perhaps been a more manageable prospect.

Ultimately the CV seems to reduce meaning. I think it therefore makes their results in some cases inevitably less niched and less specific - which would especially be a potential issue with respect to new trends which they cannot know. In some ways that seems to undermine the benefits of user generated submissions.

283
iStockPhoto.com / Re: IS removing crucial keywords
« on: December 27, 2014, 18:42 »
I agree with Joe that the CV is too limiting to allow accurate keywording.

More than that, it seems to me like an over-ambitious and ultimately inelegant and clunky idea from another era. Over engineered and ultimately neither efficient nor effective. As if all of language could somehow be streamlined and simplified. And it must surely eat resources.

The CV is often rubbish on concepts. Take eg something like 'self service' which is obviously a top 10 hot business trend today. Try finding conceptual images to represent this conceptually on iStock and you are stuck with images of food counters. Because someone has narrowed down the meaning of self-service such that it relates only to food.

This is one simple example of how the CV has over time reduced the value of the iStock collection by reducing the usefulness of the metadata. 

284
Print on Demand Forum / Re: thoughts about a few POD sites
« on: December 24, 2014, 15:10 »
According to some interviews with some artists who have some really quality fine art on POD sites, they claim that limited series prints do help, do raise the print price and also people get interested into buying original witch is artists ( at least for painters) main goal

Doing numbered editions of ink jets (sometimes amusingly called gicle prints) from a digital file seems terribly pretentious to me. The thing is endlessly reproducible at identical machine quality (unless the digital file is then verifiably destroyed !).

And it seems borderline dishonest to me - given that the prints are made to order - ie that the complete series may likely never actually exist (how can a thing be 1/50 if 50/50 does not yet exist and may never ?).

Numbered editions make sense when an image is printed from a plate which gradually degrades in quality through use. Or when an object is produced by casting. Or, for example, if a particular printer makes a series of silver prints from a negative. Years later it would be interesting to know how many of those prints were made in that edition.

285
Alamy.com / Re: Alamy distributor commision
« on: December 24, 2014, 11:15 »
better than 60 and 40?

I trust them to do the right thing. I trust them.

286
Alamy.com / Re: Alamy distributor commision
« on: December 24, 2014, 10:28 »
I feel worse about them cutting our 'normal' royalties from 60% to 50% to set up a new US office

I feel very good about 50% being the normal royalty rate and 30% being the minimum.

287
General - Top Sites / Re: EU VAT Changes from January 2015! ALERT
« on: December 23, 2014, 11:23 »
I was talking about suppliers registered in Ireland/Swiss.

The question was whether people selling through agencies would be affected. They won't. The agency is the seller/provider/supplier. Not the photographer.

if you're selling only through agencies then this won't affect you except possibly with Envato. 
Well, this possibly could affect us too, because buyers in the EU will need to pay more for our files

Clients purchasing through agencies based outside of the EU will not be paying any more for their files. They were already being charged VAT. EU clients not registered for VAT and buying from EU based agencies might pay very slightly more or less if there is a difference vs the home rate. The % difference between the states are very small.

288
General - Top Sites / Re: EU VAT Changes from January 2015! ALERT
« on: December 23, 2014, 10:56 »
Well, this possibly could affect us too, because buyers in the EU will need to pay more for our files


What has changed concerns the detail around the way in which the process is administered.


Yes that, plus no more VAT threshold and hiding in Ireland/Swiss.

http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/taxation/vat/traders/e-commerce/index_en.htm


The clients were not avoiding VAT. The clients are unaffected.

The Ireland/Swiss (?) thing does not involve clients (Switzerland is not in the EU anyhow).

The clients are not affected. They will not be paying any more for your files. They were already subject to VAT at their home rate.

289
General - Top Sites / Re: EU VAT Changes from January 2015! ALERT
« on: December 23, 2014, 10:25 »
Well, this possibly could affect us too, because buyers in the EU will need to pay more for our files

No. EU clients using stock agencies outside of the EU (eg based in the USA) have been to subject to VAT/TVA since years already. Nothing has changed in that respect. EU based clients were already paying VAT/TVA and the agencies were expected to collect it unless the client provided a VAT registration number.

What has changed concerns the detail around the way in which the process is administered.

290
Take it from someone who is facing a mountain of metadata to climb, you're well advised to do this from the start.

PhotoMechanic is meant to be very good for doing metadata. I wonder what others here think about that software.

291
This month I have 5 sales reported so far netting slightly over $200. That's a good month for me at Alamy. So very much less than iStock - but from rather different images.
Wow, that's good RPD. I'm on just under $200 GROSS for 4 sales this month.

1 of those sales is at only 30% - so it turns out it is slightly under $200 NET. 75c less than $200 ! My mistake. But yes - it is still good. Now I need to build on that.

250 @ 50%
6.14 @ 50%
85.38 @ 30%
73.63 @ 50%
17.10 @ 50%

ETA  (24th Dec): another sale showed up this morning making 6 this month and taking me back over the $200.

292
Also, can we license our images through other-than-Getty, Rights Managed sites like Almany? Are there others?

As an IS Exclusive, where do you sell your work other than iStock and how effective are those other channels?

(I do not know anything about POD.)

We can licence different content elsewhere as RM. Not the same images as we are selling at iStock as RF. It's a good positive opportunity to do something completely different.

I have a completely different portfolio at Alamy. All RM. I started uploading there in 2012. Initially I was only uploading non-commercial (aka typically editorial) content. Today I have about 700 pictures with them. It starts slowly there for most people typically. This month I have 5 sales reported so far netting slightly over $200. That's a good month for me at Alamy. So very much less than iStock - but from rather different images. Also - I feel like I am making progress there where as I stopped feeling like I was making progress at iStock. Alamy are helpful and friendly to deal with. That's a big plus.

I  think that it is also worth having the best of our legacy images sorted and keyworded ready to upload elsewhere - if we choose to or if iStock scraps the exclusive program. About 1/4, perhaps less, of my legacy RF stuff I will bother with again.

293
General - Top Sites / Re: EU VAT Changes from January 2015! ALERT
« on: December 22, 2014, 11:17 »
Topic: EU VAT Changes from January 2015! ALERT

Well you should assume that people are intelligent enough to be able to follow a number of different conversations within a thread. It's all ultimately useful background - even the wildest opinion or conspiracy. It's part of the shape of the argument. No single strand within a thread has a monopoly. That's the nature of unmoderated conversation.

At this stage there are no definitive answers or practical solutions which apply universally. Today's commercial webinar is not going to provide any practical universal solutions either. Because there are none which apply to sole traders. It's all ultimately speculative. The webinar can really be no more pertinent than anything which is already available online anyhow.

294
General - Top Sites / Re: EU VAT Changes from January 2015! ALERT
« on: December 22, 2014, 05:47 »
Looking at it from a symbiostocker's perspective,  I can see at some point paypal starting a service to handle VAT on sellers' behalf..

I cannot see this happening. Since Paypal is not the seller and does not provide a marketplace.

295
General - Top Sites / Re: EU VAT Changes from January 2015! ALERT
« on: December 22, 2014, 05:46 »
the scary thing about the ongoing economic crisis in the EU is that it's been carefully planned by the EU itself as way to further their domination plan

This is a conspiracy theory. Besides which - if the EU (or any other govt like body) had deliberately planned an economic crisis we would today likely be enjoying the greatest economic boom known in the history of the world.

while you laugh at the so called "conspiracists" they were the only ones openly warning investors before the 2008 crash and burn, the 2001 dot-com boom, the foreclosure bubble, and many more cases.

If you continually call a crash you will sometimes be right. But that is not prescience, it's the stopped clock scenario. For the past 5 or so years, for example, the doomers have been constantly predicting a crash whilst the markets continued to rise - partly on the back of govt liquidity but also because there is genuine value and new opportunity. That's what markets do. They rise and fall but not in perfect patterns.

Today anti-intellectual conspiracy thinking is epidemic, like a disease. And mainstream. It provides a commonality between groups which have no other shared values other than being anti. So self-entitled miserable anti-capitalists find themselves weirdly aligned with anti-govt ultra-capitalists, gold nuts and Bitcoiners.

296
General - Top Sites / Re: EU VAT Changes from January 2015! ALERT
« on: December 21, 2014, 13:05 »
I think you are being over dramatic Hobostocker - looking at the situation from an almost apocalyptic all or nothing perspective. Like the doomers, conspiracists and fringe economists who predict economic meltdown year after year (always trying to sell Bitcoins and gold :) )

Europe will muddle through. The same as ever. It's not a race, for most ordinary people. (And soon enough Europe will be buying gas from Israel and Egypt anyhow as the huge Mediterranean Leviathan fields come on stream.)

297
General Stock Discussion / Re: Low earners to drop in 2015
« on: December 20, 2014, 14:35 »
I can understand dropping a no-earner. But why would you drop a low-earner ?

(What is low ? Less than $100 per month ?)

298
The demand for phone photos is just a fad that will run its course

There are people making seriously big money in this arena ...

... the people renting office space and delivering pizza and weed to the venture funded tech startups which have an idea about algorithmically interpreting mobile and social and monetizing it as stock. 99.9% of these startups are going nowhere. But the 0.1% possibility keeps the venture money sloshing on through.

299
the more smartphones,the more people who will try to make some money by uploading through apps.


Have we had a thread about EyeEm already ?

Your First 100,000 Photos in The EyeEm Collection at Getty Images

EyeEm Wants to Make You a Professional Photographer !

300
My predictions:

1. I expect iStock to (sooner or later) replace the artists exclusivity program with some sort of updated offering (which will amount to ending the exclusivity program). For better or worse, artist exclusivity seems like a legacy of another era which makes all of their processes and procedures more complicated (and expensive). Change could be good for a majority of contributors. (Much content at the main Getty Images site is no longer even image exclusive from what I can see).

2. Replace the iStock forum.

3. Maybe a Getty IPO depending more on external influences than anything else. ie depends where the market goes. Either way I bet that this is the long term exit route. If not, what ?

4. Jim Pickerell says there is a rumour that Getty is looking to get out of editorial. Not that this directly affects most of us here.

Me - Alamy and small cameras. Same as my 2014 prediction. That is working for me.

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 ... 62

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors