MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Minsc
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 ... 23
276
« on: March 09, 2017, 18:53 »
But AdSense can be used with less work than you have to do for microstock and they pay 51% for that. The microstock sites might say they have to pay more to host our images but Youtube pay 55% and they have those costs.
You still have to get an audience to visit your site on a regular basis, otherwise you'll be making pennies. Microstock agencies does a lot of the marketing work for you.
277
« on: March 09, 2017, 18:49 »
I had the best start to a month since I joined SS. I don't know if it'll hold up for the rest of the month, but if it does, it's going to be a new BME.
278
« on: March 09, 2017, 18:47 »
If you want to succeed in this business, consider uploading something other than travel and everyday photos.
279
« on: March 08, 2017, 22:32 »
I have a friend that makes $70,000 (USD) in Microstock and about $65,000 (USD) in his day time job. He thought about quitting his day to go full time in Microstock- he decided to keep his day job. A wise move in my eyes...
Smart man. I don't think I'll quit my day job even if I make 6-figures in Microstock. Interacting with people in a work environment beats working alone. It's also better to have multiple sources of income instead of one.
280
« on: March 08, 2017, 22:27 »
Google pay 70% for paid for apps. I think Apple are similar? People make apps all over the world. You don't have to buy expensive cameras and lenses to make apps. People from less affluent countries can make apps. Perhaps not as easy as using a camera but the difference between 70% and 15% seems too big.
It's not the same. I've made and sold apps. The amount of of work required to make an app is exponentially higher than microstock and the earnings are lower when you factor in the amount of time spent on it. When Apple announced they were taking 30%, developers were pretty angry. Many believe that Apple should only get 10-15% max when you account for how much time and money the developer spends on development and marketing. Once an image is uploaded, there's is little upkeep required from the contributor. You just wait for it rise up the search results over time. Once an App is upload, there's marketing, constant updates and the fight to stay relevant. Instead of rising up the search results, it does the exact opposite...it falls into irrelevance. That's why the developer gets 70% of paid apps and In-App-Purchases. 99% of Apps don't make any money so 70% of $0 is still $0. It's much more profitable in Microstock despite the lower royalty rate.
281
« on: March 07, 2017, 19:15 »
Whatever the reason it's all gone crappy. Sales in every income stream for me (music/sfx/image) have diminished drasticly in the last 12-18 months. Producing more and more work doesn't even keep you running on the spot anymore. I feel like I am under the table of a feast scrabbling around for dropped crumbs only the crumbs are less and less.
In 6 years my house will be paid for so that's my goal. After that the pressure will be off somewhat.
Good luck on paying it off. I think the Microstock market has matured a lot from its younger days. I've seen over a dozen large studios with over 100K images in many microstock sites. Some has over 1 million images and they're incredibly successful. That's over 1% of an entire agency's portfolio. If we assume that they earn 1% of the revenue (I'm guessing a lot more), that's over $1 million a year. Spread that across multiple microstock websites, and they can earn over $3 million a year. They can use that money to get the best gear, models, studio setups, props, dedicated uploaders, keywording experts, designers and more. That's what everyone has to compete with. I think it's a lot of nonsense when people say that there is no quality in Microstock. There's so much good work in there by these large studios. Maybe 75% is garbage, but you're still competing against 25 Million+ high quality images from studios and elite photographers/designers. That's why I encourage people to learn to compete against the best on the other thread. It's pointless to worry about new contributors who got accepted because they got 1 image approved. That's like worrying about a little leech on your leg when you're surrounded by a bunch of lions.
282
« on: March 07, 2017, 15:01 »
If there is an overall increase in sales at SS, it means there is a chance for revenue increase. Not a great one, but a small one and that's all you need sometimes. Common sense says that as the pie gets bigger, everyone gets a smaller piece as contributor numbers increase. That's not necessarily true. The pie gets bigger, but certain contributors take a bigger piece of the pie sometimes. Common sense can fool you.
As a regular buyer, I see what's going on better than most people. I was downloading about 10 images the other day and I noticed that most of the images I was going to download belong to one of the more prolific contributors...African Studio. I work in the healthcare space and these guys have 17,000 healthcare photos in their portfolio.
You know what else I noticed? They have good keywording. They have over 40 keywords each to maximize discoverability. I think many of you guys are looking at things that doesn't exist. While some of you see threats from Russia, Ukraine, Poland, and parts of Asia, I see the biggest threats from the big studios like African Studio, and RawPixel.com who are eating a bigger piece of the pie and leaving scraps for everyone else.
I expect the toughest competition from big studios with high quality work and high quality keywording, not from inexperience upstarts. Most small contributors are too inexperienced and doesn't produce good keywording, and their work will rarely be seen. Big studios dominate a good part of the search results. i suspect that the top 10% of the contributors make 90% of the profits, leaving the last 10% to the other 90% of contributors.
283
« on: March 06, 2017, 12:28 »
Still waiting on these guys. Hopefully we get it by the end of the week.
284
« on: March 05, 2017, 23:32 »
If they see a decline in sales, they will add back the watermarks.
285
« on: March 02, 2017, 19:28 »
I dont see any difference.
For me its still showing my most popular images inside the same artist section regardless of similarity. And there is no change on my download counts. So business as usual...
BTW, Hi everybody.
Try doing a incognito search. I think they're slowly rolling it out to all regions. It worked on my computer in the morning, and then later on my mobile devices. I think most people will see it today or tomorrow.
286
« on: March 02, 2017, 14:45 »
And it's going to benefit contributors.
Before, it was showing the most popular images from a contributor's portfolio. Today, they started showing similar images from the contributor's portfolio to better compete with the "Similar Images" section.
I woke up to more downloads this morning and people are downloading similar images from my portfolio. I haven't seen sales moving at this pace since November. March is going to be a great month if this new change sticks.
287
« on: March 02, 2017, 13:56 »
Some people want images that haven't been used over and over again I would think
If that's the case, then I wish the best of luck to them. Every popular image will get reused eventually, some over 10,000 times. If they want something exclusive, they need to hire a photographer or designer.
288
« on: March 02, 2017, 13:51 »
Base on my numbers, 123RF is 1/8 of SS. It's not a top tier agency, but they're consistent and they're growing. 123RF like every other agency is constantly growing their portfolio. The pie is getting bigger, but smaller pieces for everyone.
I don't understand the point of deleting your whole portfolio unless you're going exclusive. You lose your search position and you start from the bottom all over again if you decide to go back in the future. It doesn't matter where you go, you're competing with over 50 million images.
289
« on: March 02, 2017, 13:41 »
I've download over 1000 images from SS and I've been almost always able to find what I need. It took a bit of work for some, but it's there. I don't know why anyone would use the New section for their main search. Popular is popular is for a reason.
There is a lot of good stuff on SS these days, some of the images rivaling and sometimes surpassing many Macro images.
290
« on: March 01, 2017, 20:34 »
It's not ready for me either.
These guys are delaying everyone from finishing up their taxes.
291
« on: February 24, 2017, 15:00 »
I had a number of rejections lately as well. Most of them due to 'duplication' even though they're different. Another reason was "low commercial value". Sounds like they're getting stricter across the board. 123RF is still a decent agency. Sales have picked up recently and I like what I'm seeing.
292
« on: February 22, 2017, 16:26 »
Looks like it was a temporary problem. Everything is back to normal again.
293
« on: February 21, 2017, 19:07 »
I was a happy contributor until my income started dropping. Not so happy now. It's cute to see one of my newbie friends gushing on Facebook that he got ten sales on SS a couple of days ago. All subs. Lowest tier. $2.50 makes him giddy. Doesn't really notice the new dashboard because he still sees all his sales on one page, so what's the big diff?
I remember when I was excited to get ten sales too. Now my index finger hurts from the annoying click, click, clicking to see what I once saw at a glance. And ten sales in one day would make me cry.
All depends on your POV.
Everyone has to start somewhere. If he's new and he's getting 10 sales a day, it's a good start. I remember I had 3 sales in my first month and I became super motivated to do better. Today, he may have 10 sales a day. In a couple years, it could become 100.
294
« on: February 21, 2017, 17:09 »
123RF is performing very well for me this month. A large sale a week ago has turned a good month into a great one. It's a new BME.
295
« on: February 20, 2017, 03:13 »
Eventually I expect that will happen. But as I said earlier in the thread, in spite of all the income loss, I managed to build a large, high quality enough portfolio to keep bringing in some royalties for another few years. At least as much as I would make in a real world job, with my skill set.
So no, I'm not going to drag my 50+ year old, sciatica plagued body out to learn a new trade that won't pay what I'm making now. I'm gonna wring every drop of passive income I can out of micro, and I'm gonna be mad every time some greedy agency takes another chunk of my retirement income away to line their pockets.
If you can't understand the logic in that, you are free to disagree, but you're not gonna shut me up. I have as much right to complain about unfair practices as anyone else. And in case you didn't notice, the people who are upset about falling incomes seem to outnumber the blissful ones by a pretty high margin. It did NOT used to be that way. When there was nothing to complain about, nobody had to run around telling people to stop complaining.
PS. My sanity is in good shape. Insanity would be to see your livlihood going down the toilet and NOT have a problem with that!
Obviously, this is partially directed at me. If you look at my points, and read it in context, you'll see that I didn't ask you learn a new trade. I was suggesting learning other ways to generate passive income. If you think veterans have it hard, the newbies have it even harder. They have compete against 100 million images, whereas the veterans have many images that are well-established in the search results. You can call me inexperienced all you like, but I didn't break into SS's top tier and FT's weekly top 100 in less than 2 years if I didn't know what I was doing. I had to learn things faster than the veterans and I had to work harder. You already know how to generate passive income with Microstock, so that experience can translate to a number of other fields that can serve as complimentary income. That's all I suggest. You don't need years, just months. I learned to make apps in 2 months with no programming experience. I went into microstock with no experience other than as a buyer of stock images. I know some people here are younger, and while you have some valid excuses, some don't. They waste plenty of time talking about Trump when they could put that time to better use. I'm no spring chicken myself. In Silicon Valley, I'm considered over the hill, and yet I force myself to learn new things constantly otherwise I'll get left behind. My optimistic attitude isn't some delusion, it's a necessity. Believe me when I tell you this, microstockers have it much easier than app developers. They spend 2 months on something only to give it away for FREE to serve ads, and many people don't download random free apps anymore. Other than Getty, whom I've always said was predatory company, the other agencies treat people relatively fairly. Maybe things aren't what they were 10 years ago, but nothing ever is. The market is saturated and there are over 150,000 contributors. That's the world we live in.
296
« on: February 19, 2017, 13:52 »
I like the list and can agree with pretty much everything but point 3 really bothers me.
Granted some niches are easily to replicate, but i think overall it's better to be a specialist in a few areas of photography than a generalist in many. In my opinion, more than niche it's about identifying trends that will be popular in the near future.
You're right. I should amend that and say don't go exclusively or spend the majority of your time on niches. I would encourage spending some time on niches. It usually have a nice burst of sales in the beginning. The danger is of course having all your earnings dry up once everyone else start filling that niche. Being first to market, if you can find a market that is fresh is important. The problem is that it's not sustainable in the long run. That's why diversification is needed in every portfolio.
298
« on: February 18, 2017, 13:53 »
So far I've gotten tax documents from:
- Shutterstock - Fotolia/Adobe Stock - iStock/Getty
Still missing:
- 123RF
I vaguely remember 123RF made it available late February last year. Has anyone gotten anything from them yet?
299
« on: February 16, 2017, 16:07 »
blaming low sales on the new dashboard? thought I heard it all
And yet I saw the same thing - maybe it is more than just a new dashboard, maybe there's a change to the search introduced at the same time.
BTW - isn't it weird that the sales are listed numerically according to the first digit in the file number, rather than taking account of the whole number (i.e. file 10,000,000,000 first, followed by file 20, followed by 3,000,000, followed by 456)
Sales are listed in this order: Number of sales, followed by newest upload followed by download order for that day. It was by newest upload a few days ago that I remembered, but looks like some thing changed. There hasn't been any changes to the search that anyone has noticed. If sales are down, it's probably because of increased competition.
300
« on: February 14, 2017, 02:32 »
The navigation is lousy, but uploading is surprising fast and easy compared to the old iStock uploader. No more custom dictionary nonsense.
Review time was also surprisingly fast. Had a few files reviewed within an hour.
The UI of the site is not intuitive. Looks like it's designed by a bunch of developers, not designers. It'll take some getting use to, but it's a lot easier to upload to than the old iStock.
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 ... 23
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|