2776
General - Top Sites / Re: In terms of revenue is Shutterstock now a bigger agency than Istock?
« on: August 03, 2013, 09:27 »
]
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 2776
General - Top Sites / Re: In terms of revenue is Shutterstock now a bigger agency than Istock?« on: August 03, 2013, 09:27 »
]
2777
General - Top Sites / Re: In terms of revenue is Shutterstock now a bigger agency than Istock?« on: August 01, 2013, 18:47 »
]
2778
General - Top Sites / Re: In terms of revenue is Shutterstock now a bigger agency than Istock?« on: August 01, 2013, 18:33 »
]
2779
General - Top Sites / Re: In terms of revenue is Shutterstock now a bigger agency than Istock?« on: August 01, 2013, 17:50 »
]
2780
General - Top Sites / Re: In terms of revenue is Shutterstock now a bigger agency than Istock?« on: August 01, 2013, 16:41 »
]
2781
General - Top Sites / Re: In terms of revenue is Shutterstock now a bigger agency than Istock?« on: August 01, 2013, 16:00 »
]
2782
General - Top Sites / Re: In terms of revenue is Shutterstock now a bigger agency than Istock?« on: August 01, 2013, 15:48 »
]
2783
General - Top Sites / Re: In terms of revenue is Shutterstock now a bigger agency than Istock?« on: August 01, 2013, 15:28 »
]
2784
General - Top Sites / Re: In terms of revenue is Shutterstock now a bigger agency than Istock?« on: August 01, 2013, 15:23 »
]
2785
General - Top Sites / Re: In terms of revenue is Shutterstock now a bigger agency than Istock?« on: August 01, 2013, 14:57 »
]
2786
General - Top Sites / Re: In terms of revenue is Shutterstock now a bigger agency than Istock?« on: August 01, 2013, 14:47 »
]
2788
General Stock Discussion / Re: Need help with Model release puzzle« on: August 01, 2013, 13:03 »
'
2790
General Stock Discussion / Re: Need help with Model release puzzle« on: August 01, 2013, 12:30 »
'
2791
General Stock Discussion / Re: Need help with Model release puzzle« on: August 01, 2013, 11:57 »
'
2793
iStockPhoto.com / Re: 24 cent GI sales (moved to it's own, from another topic)« on: July 31, 2013, 21:18 »
'
2794
General Stock Discussion / Re: Yuri Arcurs First Public Statement« on: July 31, 2013, 18:03 »There have been other reports of indies having GI sales. I'm saying it wasn't a GI sale, it was a Partner Program sale from Getty Images. At least that's how it was listed. GI sales are a different thing, they are from mirrored content on Getty Images. Just trying to keep things clear, it gets confusing if you call things by the wrong name. Pete may actually have GI sales which would be a different issue. 2795
General Stock Discussion / Re: Yuri Arcurs First Public Statement« on: July 31, 2013, 17:37 »There have been other reports of indies having GI sales. In that link he says they show up as partner program sales in green and the details say from Getty Images. GI sales show up purple and Connect show up as black. 2796
General Stock Discussion / Re: Yuri Arcurs First Public Statement« on: July 31, 2013, 17:10 »What are all the 24 cent sales I'm getting for the last two months? I assumed, some kind of low cost subs? I can't even figure out how to see what's being licensed. Just shows up a month later as GI.You are getting GI sales? Do they show up purple on the graph?What next for IS? Their own subscription plan perhaps?They have one, but it's not low enough priced to compete with SS, which is why Getty took over TS and Photos.com and sent most iS files there. 2797
General Stock Discussion / Re: How do you know that agencies are being honest about sales?« on: July 31, 2013, 16:58 »
'
2798
General Stock Discussion / Re: Yuri Arcurs First Public Statement« on: July 31, 2013, 16:55 »
Isn't it enough to say that Yuri thought he would be better off with Getty and Getty thought they would be better off with Yuri? They worked out a deal that was beneficial to both parties and that's it. About the analysis, I think Istock only lost only a few thousand images during the D day thing. A lot of those images were ones that weren't selling anyways so they probably overall had little value. The exclusives that left have pretty much all kept their images with Istock. Sean was a separate issue. I think these changes to add a lot of files to the Partner Program have been in the works for a long time and had nothing to do with D-day. In one week they replaced more than all the files that were taken down.
2799
General Stock Discussion / Re: shutterstock« on: July 31, 2013, 15:16 »Looks like you either didn't read what I wrote or you are trying to insult me even when I'm agreeing with you. I don't think I said not to enjoy Shutterstock, what I said was he shouldn't be calling people names and saying they work for the company (Shutterstock) because he doesn't like what they have to say. I also don't call people trolls, or shills, or insulting names because they like Shutterstock. I think it's wrong to call people names just because they disagree with you, I have no problem arguing or debating though.This seems to be common idea for some people on this site. The only way someone could disagree with you is if they were paid, a shill of some kind, a village idiot, a troll, (I can't even write half the things gostwyck called me, I'll get banned 2800
General Stock Discussion / Re: shutterstock« on: July 31, 2013, 14:02 »
This seems to be common idea for some people on this site. The only way someone could disagree with you is if they were paid, a shill of some kind, a village idiot, a troll, (I can't even write half the things gostwyck called me, I'll get banned
![]() |
Submit Your Vote
|