|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - gemmy12
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17
301
« on: November 30, 2011, 09:35 »
[quote author=rubyroo link=topic=11825.msg230178#msg230178 date=132266306
ETA: I find it really strange that agencies don't actually state these rules (if indeed that is a rule). FT is the worst in this regard, but if they actually clarified these things, the reviewers wouldn't be wasting time on images they can't add to the library. It's in their interest to make these things clearer, and yet they choose not to.
[/quote]
Very much correct
302
« on: November 30, 2011, 07:45 »
ok. thank you for suggesting cobalt
303
« on: November 30, 2011, 07:22 »
and my smiley face and doll were selected by DT while SS rejected them... lol
304
« on: November 30, 2011, 07:20 »
Today also no improvement in my alamy QC.. seems something wrong either from their side or from my side- lol my photos
305
« on: November 30, 2011, 03:08 »
I have sympathy with Herg... do let us know when your images are finally approved in SS... al the best
306
« on: November 30, 2011, 02:09 »
I have a question regarding copyrights : The thumb up from facebook is copyrighted?
This proves that there is always a chance of rejection on the basis of copyright... better not to post an object's photo in your 1st approval step... from my own experience i learnt that. No Guarantee that your own thumb is not a copyright of anyone and if not then also post in editorial... atleast for initial approval lol. be in safe side, otherwise you keep shouting later and people will keep on providing you the links that your thumb is copyright hehehehehe
307
« on: November 30, 2011, 01:14 »
yes. Even i know many links about spoile being trademark. I also posted above links of similar smileys which are posted and accepted in SS.
Do give me links where my doll is a trademark.
308
« on: November 30, 2011, 00:54 »
lol. I am planning to submit all 10 editorial photos after 30 days so that there is no chance of such contradictory decisions lol
309
« on: November 30, 2011, 00:23 »
@attila.
You mean unless one object is not self made it can not be submitted as RF. So according to you all the smiley objects without people are either self made or are posted before yahoo came to exist that sometime before 2000 or 2001 ?
And how can one say that its not made in my own factory (as there is no visible logo on it) Lol this is IMHO really not a valid points.
310
« on: November 30, 2011, 00:02 »
They must delete or they should put a note in the front page or atleast in shutterbuzz where they have mentioned that "smiley face is trademark from 1971" that they are not accepting such smiley from date-xyz. Photos of smileys submitted before that date are retained in SS. etc etc More over they dont mention the date uploaded any photo like IS..
Because many a new contributors like me 1st explore the site's gallery to know what kind of photos are being accepted before planning to submit their own photos
311
« on: November 29, 2011, 23:43 »
312
« on: November 29, 2011, 22:44 »
ok so simply SS does not accept any one in his 1st attempt lol
313
« on: November 29, 2011, 22:23 »
This is strange man... then why don't they consider a tree, garden or a shape of pond,a crown or a patter/design as trademark of some restaurant,any school or any cloth company.. I seriously cant digest such reasons... everything has a chance of being a potential trademark somewhere in any corner of the world... or else they simply must not accept an individual doll or any object. In fact they should not keep a category named "Object or abstract" also. So funny.
314
« on: November 29, 2011, 22:10 »
But then they can assume anything for any submission man... anyways what about this doll ? If they had considered any 1 of these then i could have scored 7/10... 
315
« on: November 29, 2011, 22:01 »
Ok I posted my 10 images for 1st time for approval in SS... 4 were rejected with comments and rest without any comments. but these 2 photos got strange reason for rejection-- " Trademark--Contains potential trademark or copyright infringement" (for both these photos) But i did not find any logo or something anywhere in my whole photo, do you ? More over these 2 are already in my DT gallery so why did they not find any Trademark potential ? please help me. Its so frustrating. Can I reclaim for these 2 photos in SS ?  
316
« on: November 29, 2011, 21:21 »
congratulation korn. How many images do you have in your SS gallery ?
317
« on: November 29, 2011, 21:01 »
yeah thats true Ed. Still if we just consider the number of sales in a unit time then which site sells more images of a contributor. As i said earlier if we ignore amount of income or selection procedure,quality etc. Then simply which site sells more images (of a single contributor per day o month or any other unit time).
318
« on: November 29, 2011, 13:14 »
I joined Alamy on 26.11, uploaded my initial images on 27.11 and received confirmation that I passed the Quality Control test on 28.11. I'd say pretty smooth sailing.
but 27-11 was sunday and i dont think they review pix on sunday/weekends...
319
« on: November 29, 2011, 11:42 »
yes Stockastic, i know that. This imy initial QC so no past history in alamy...
320
« on: November 29, 2011, 10:57 »
Ok Eli. Thank you. lets see what happens to my QC... 
321
« on: November 29, 2011, 10:55 »
So friends..
here i invite you to share your information on sale in these 3 macro sites.. simply tell us which site out of-
Getty / Corbis / Alamy
is selling (in average per day or per month) more images of yours now a days/recently...
Thanking you.
322
« on: November 29, 2011, 10:45 »
got two approved this morning
congratulation Julie. I dont whats wrong with mine. Alamy must keep their contributors well informed atleast what they are doing with then. 
I'm sure an initial submission will always take longer than regular QC.
hmmm well i have no othe choice than waiting. But still can you tell me how much longer may they take for review on a new QC ?
323
« on: November 29, 2011, 10:26 »
My best guess is
Getty
Corbis
Masterfile
thank you Mr stock. Does alamy not stand anywhere ? Another question. Which macro site does sell contributors photo more frequently ?
324
« on: November 29, 2011, 10:16 »
got two approved this morning
congratulation Julie. I dont whats wrong with mine. Alamy must keep their contributors well informed atleast what they are doing with then.
325
« on: November 29, 2011, 10:09 »
I'm have +300 images RF ( will start sending some RM in 2012 ), 100% acceptance rate, almost one year there and have one sale... novell use... 0,41c
Anyway, only last month I start re-keywording all images and start getting more zooms , better CTR.. lets hope 
Ok, this month I get 3 zooms over 2 f-16 pictures, and one of them get a sale ( 3mb - 1350 x 900 pixels ): 131,40$ of Commission
I love Alamy @_@
BTW, get same time 2 on SS, 1 on FT... I refuse say how much I get over these 3 sales LOL
Hey you sold pic in alamy. Did not know that Congrats. :-)
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
