pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Anyka

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 ... 37
301
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia D-Day (Deactivation Day) - May,1
« on: May 07, 2014, 09:42 »
They should just remove the $10 option. One option, just $99, $1 images. I might still stay out of it, but at least then it wouldn't be as big a threat to the whole market.

Okay ... I say 100$ for 100 images, you say 99$ for 99 images.  You're absolutely right, 99 sounds much better  ;D

302
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia D-Day (Deactivation Day) - May,1
« on: May 07, 2014, 09:39 »
I cannot afford loosing my FT income either, but I did opt out of DPC.  Not because I am against Fotolia (Fotolia is my 2nd earner, so how could I be against them?), but because I believe that if a LARGE group of contributors opt out, Fotolia will listen to us.

We talk about Fotolia "changing DPC" in favour of their contributors.  What change would make you opt in again?

In my case it would be :  move DPC more towards big players by raising the 10 $ bar => 100 $.

for how many pictures?

For 100 images.  I can easily ask an agency to drop a project completely or charge 100$ for 1 image, but that's asking for something they would never do.  If Fotolia would change the essence of DPC (which is 1 image for 1 $), they would loose face.  But if they would raise the bar to 100 images for 100 $, small buyers would be obliged to keep on buying credits.  DPC would become a very simple and effective subscription system.  Buyers who would buy a 100$-set would use it up, even if they only needed 60 images, which is the essence of a subscription system.  Fotolia can implement this without loosing face.  DPC would still be 1 image for 1 dollar.

303
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia D-Day (Deactivation Day) - May,1
« on: May 07, 2014, 08:45 »
I cannot afford loosing my FT income either, but I did opt out of DPC.  Not because I am against Fotolia (Fotolia is my 2nd earner, so how could I be against them?), but because I believe that if a LARGE group of contributors opt out, Fotolia will listen to us.

We talk about Fotolia "changing DPC" in favour of their contributors.  What change would make you opt in again?

In my case it would be :  move DPC more towards big players by raising the 10 $ bar => 100 $.

304
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia D-Day (Deactivation Day) - May,1
« on: May 02, 2014, 09:08 »
I compared the search numbers for the terms Business, People, Beautiful, Animal and Nature, and the average difference between Fotolia and DPC is 17,3%. 

17,3% of 27.900.000 images = 4.798.800 files less on Fotolia than on DPC.
Are these ALL opted-out images ... or had Fotolia forgotten to add a few million to DPC ?

305
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia D-Day (Deactivation Day) - May,1
« on: May 02, 2014, 06:42 »
OK, I know I'm late, but I just opted out. 
So that's 7500 files less on DPC.

306
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia D-Day (Deactivation Day) - May,1
« on: May 02, 2014, 05:59 »
Does anyone has an idea how many pictures are left available at the DPC ? Now the opt out option is available probably everybody is using it ?

Has the Opt-Out button moved again?  Mine was there and now it's gone (no more on my Dashboard at "actions").  Logging out/in or deleting cache does not help either.

307
Shutterstock.com / Re: The next nightmare comes true
« on: April 16, 2014, 15:24 »

Quote
So if the artwork is created by Disney it has copyright, but if the artwork is created by someone else it doesn't have copyright?

I think the issue is copying a character or unique design versus a common subject such as a flower

Exactly.
We should not mix up "skill" with "creation".
If the act of picking the ink, choosing the needle, dialing in the settings, etc. would be ART (instead of the creation of the image on the skin), then all sewing, embroidery, basket weaving, carpentry etc would also be ART, and therefore require a PR.  But no, it is only needed if there is a true "creation".   
My mother loves embroidery, and she's very skilled, but she only works from an example, so she's not "creating" anything.  I'm not saying such skills cannot be art, just that the act itself does not make it art.  Pottery is a great example :  you can make true pottery art, or you can just use your pottery skills to make a basic vase.  The same way a tattoo can be just a tattoo (like a word) or a piece of art.

Interesting discussion!

308
I had one even dumber, life-threatening experience which was so embarrassingly stupid that I won't even admit to it here. Suffice it to say that it could have put me in line for a Darwin Award.

oh please please please tell us????;D

309
Dumbest, and als most dangerous thing I ever did in the studio :  I was working with candles and incense, and an old incense holder.  I did not want to burn my fingers while putting the little round black charcoals in the burner, so I used pincers, lit the charcoal and tried to put it in the burner.  I'm rather clumsy with pincers, so I dropped the glowing black coal on the floor ... a synthetic BLACK carpet.  No idea how far the ROUND charcoal had rolled through the studio.  Result :  I KNEW there was a burning black coal on my black carpet, but I could not SEE it. Not even with all the lights on. Total panic.  Then I pulled myself together, filled a bucket with water, took the fire extinguisher and waited till I could see smoke or flames starting ...  Suddenly I heard a hissing sound behind me, and yes, the fire had started and I poured the whole bucket on it.  That was the last time I used fire in the studio.

310
Same here!  I'll be monitoring my next EL closely!!  Please keep us informed about Fotolia's reply? 

311
Five years ago I also thought I had to stop doing shoots with people, animals and outdoor subjects because of hip artrosis (at 50!) and very painful wrists/shoulders.  My physiotherapist said that moving less would make things worse, and she was right.  So I changed my eating habits drastically :  0% sugar  :'(, less meat and much more fruit and veggies, plus daily turmuric, glucosamine and mild exercise (20 minutes/day on my home trainer bike).  Today I can do every photo session that I want, as long as I don't have to walk great distances ... and I haven't seen my physiotherapist in 2 years  :)

I am not saying these things will solve your problems, but as nothing of the above is unhealthy, and there is no prescription medicine involved, anyone with joints/muscles/back problems could give it a try.  Only, you have to be very patient - you'll only see improvement after 4 to 6 months, and it's not a temporary thing, it's for life ...

312
Dreamstime.com / Re: New design for submission page
« on: March 22, 2014, 12:29 »
Oops, I noticed just in time that "sell the rights" is now default ON !  And if I switch it off, the next image is ON again  >:(

313
iStockPhoto.com / Re: PP Sales for Feb 2014 have started
« on: March 17, 2014, 17:03 »
Hi Lisa,
You made me check my numbers, but the results are quite normal.  My average PP sale is between 0.32 and 0.38 (average of 2013 till now), and February has an average of 0.35, so that's quite normal, and there must be non-subs in it, otherwise it would be 0.28.

314
I had 2 EXT sales in the PP list they sent me :

21141711       2013-10-08 04:47:20       EXT1       39.84       0.28       39.56
21914614       2013-10-16 06:45:36       EXT1       39.84       0.28       39.56

Now there are 2 possibilities :
1. They made a mistake while correcting the mistake
2. TS has been paying us 28 cents per Extended License for YEARS (so it's not a mistake, but intentional).

VERY interested in the reply ... if you every get one.

315
If they've underpaid contributors -- then I don't know why they don't wait until they sort the whole thing out, rather than set up six monthly installments for each contributor involved, and then additional transactions to repay the money they underpaid?  Seems like it would be cleaner to me. 

Because "(50 x 6) - (2,5 x 3)" is a LOT more complicated for IS than "50x6" and THEN "2,5x3"

316
Well, I never got my announcement-mail from Istock (though I checked my spam box every day), but today they took 68,8 dollars from my account.  So now I just have to do 68,8 x 6 to know what the missing e-mail had to say.  412,80 $.  GREAT!

317
Has any of the European Istockers received his/her e-mail yet?  I haven't got mine yet, and I don't believe for a second they'll forget me (my October PP was more than double of September).

318
Interesting.  One question though :  while choosing the 5 images ... can you download them?   

319
This made me smile :  what if I made a list of my 10 crappiest, out of focus, noisiest photos on DP, and listed them here on MSG, so people with some free time could buy them, and ask their money back  ;D   Childish?  yeah, I know, but fun!

Fun, but given the company in question, risky.
Given their track record of being - how to put it politely - economical with the truth, who's to say that the money back guarantee is any more solid than the hand picked curated collection of high quality noise free images? :)

True!  Very risky!   ;D

320
I've been browsing the Shotshop website ...
If you click on a people-image, it says "Releases :  none" (while I happen to know that mine are ALL released).
So they "hire" all DP images without the releases (for some reason, I find that reassuring  ???)

They also give "quality guarantee" :

"Shotshop is big in benefits (services) and small in prices. This is how our Money-back Guarantee works:
You might have used budget stock photography before and know the problem: a budget price comes with budget quality. Images are out of focus or pixelated, dirty and dusty, suffer from strong image noise, clumsy masking or bad retouching... the list of possible deficiencies is long and very annoying.
Shotshop's Money-back Guarantee proves that our quality is reliable:
If you are not satisfied with the image quality or find severe deficiencies in one of our images, we will refund your money immediately.
Shotshop.com has always been a pioneer in terms of quality and has focused on quality rather than quantity from the very beginning. Every single image is checked by our own image editors. We employ very strict technical and thematic standards and only images that meet these high Shotshop quality standards go into our portfolio. Although we have our editorial staff work a lot more than many other stock agency, we are convinced that it's worth it.
We can guarantee you a portfolio of well sorted, high quality images!"

This made me smile :  what if I made a list of my 10 crappiest, out of focus, noisiest photos on DP, and listed them here on MSG, so people with some free time could buy them, and ask their money back  ;D   Childish?  yeah, I know, but fun!

321
Shutterstock.com / Re: resubmitting on shutterstock, any tips?
« on: February 20, 2014, 02:50 »
Yes, you really have to add a not, to avoid a warning from SS.  I just got a batch of 20 accepted for 50%, the other 50% was refused again, but for different reasons.

322
I only just discovered this topic, and read all 9 pages, hoping for 1 reply/explanation/excuse/anything by DP themselves.  Nothing.  Nihil.  Can't believe this.  This topic is more than a week old. 

323
Ft doesn't care, but they are consistent in rejecting the same images. They have a record of rejects that you cannot delete.  if you go into your files, there is a icon that says "show deleted files" or something like that.  if you click on that it will show you all the rejections and there's no way to get rid of it. So wile I resubmit to them over and over rejected files, most never make it in.

Hey, I never noticed I could not delete the rejected Fotolia files! 
I'll submit a few rejected landscapes this evening, with a little note.  I'll have to submit manually, as I can't seem to find the "note to reviewer" when I use the indexing method ...

324
So 123rf is OK, Dreamstime does not like it AND notices when we do resubmit, and Shutterstock is OK as long as we add a note.

Any one know about Fotolia's attitude towards resubmitting?  My acceptance there is very high, but they sometimes reject "all nature shots" (probably because of some temporary reviewers' instructions).  I have a series of landscapes they rejected, while the 1 they DID accept is now my bestseller (at Fotolia)  ;D

325
General Stock Discussion / Resubmitting ... allowed? worth while?
« on: February 16, 2014, 02:12 »
Hi, I usually do not resubmit anything, except on SS with corrected flaws + a notice to the reviewer, but sometimes I get cranky when I see how many well-selling files there are in the "refused" folder of the other agencies.

Does any of you have experience in resubmitting to FT/DST/123rf/GLO/DP/CAN ... ?  Do they allow it, and if yes, should we draw their attention to the fact that it's a second time, or to the first refusal-reason?   

For SS I know that resubmitting is only allowed if you "announce" it, and you're supposed to correct the file first, not just resubmit it, but what about the others?  Has any one ever had a problem with it ?

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 ... 37

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors