MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - roede-orm
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 ... 22
326
« on: April 23, 2014, 16:32 »
.. you mean delete all images? i just started with them 3 months ago. i dont know what to do. will they solve it or stay "illegal" ..?
One more time: it's impossible to delete the pictures. You can only disable the images. DP will keep the pics forever-for "statistical purposes". It is simply an impertinence! 
Is that legal? Can I, with a letter from a solicitor, demand they delete my images? It cant be they have control over my IP. Can it?
As we say in German - Where there is no plaintiff, there is no judge.
327
« on: April 23, 2014, 15:55 »
.. you mean delete all images? i just started with them 3 months ago. i dont know what to do. will they solve it or stay "illegal" ..?
One more time: it's impossible to delete the pictures. You can only disable the images. DP will keep the pics forever-for "statistical purposes". It is simply an impertinence!
328
« on: April 23, 2014, 08:59 »
Crestock- who cares? Waste of time!
329
« on: April 22, 2014, 04:21 »
You can read it in the mail you will receive from DT. You have one week before the pictures will automatically converted to the free section.
330
« on: April 14, 2014, 11:51 »
i'm so sick of this new wave of mobile apps.
the LAST thing mobile screens were designed for is complex stuff like LR or PS !
agree 100%
331
« on: April 11, 2014, 13:19 »
I changed my passwords for security reasons on all major microstock sites. Have no idea, if it's necessary, but I feel better now 
If you did it before the site fixed the bug then you should probably do it again after it's fixed.
Yes, unfortunality true
332
« on: April 11, 2014, 10:59 »
I changed my passwords for security reasons on all major microstock sites. Have no idea, if it's necessary, but I feel better now
333
« on: April 01, 2014, 12:44 »
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.
because the Lefts and revolutionaries could never build good cameras and lenses?
334
« on: March 26, 2014, 01:21 »
Sales? What sales?
335
« on: March 25, 2014, 13:44 »
Suppose an Extended License gets sold through Shotshop, would we be getting $0,30 as well?
You're right, just as it is
336
« on: March 23, 2014, 03:53 »
Who wants to live in a boring suburb or country town if you can be in a vibrant metropolis??
Me  I would prefer the middle of nowhere instead of each vibrant city
337
« on: March 20, 2014, 00:55 »
Some more SODs as usual in my case in 2014
338
« on: March 17, 2014, 09:31 »
I wasn't looking at Canon camera specs when these came out, but I can't find that feature mentioned in the literature online about them. It would mean the frames would come out numbered in reverse order, which would be a little bit odd. Is that what happens? If not, then it might just be that someone had a misunderstanding about how they work - after all, how often is a back opened by accident? I think it's only happened once to me, and that was with a Pentacon Six that locks with a sliding bar held in place by friction that you pull down to open, I jumped off a small rock and the jolt to the camera was enough to shift the bar (and the backing paper saved most of the frames).
The Canon cameras were used on archaeological excavations. This is a hostile environment for Cameras - sand, dust, dirt. And many people who have no idea about photography :-) It did not happen so rarely that students or staff accidentally opened a camera. Sometimes the small gears, wich wind the film, were worn out. The gears were indeed made of soft plastic. Then went nothing more and you had to open the camera. Even the lock of the camera is not very firm. The older, cheap Canon cameras were much less robust than comparable Nikon models. But some films were partially saved because Canon cameras withdrew the film frame by frame into the cartridge. I checked today , some Canon 300 N and 500 N are still in use.
339
« on: March 16, 2014, 15:41 »
Question from a new person to micro/mid stock photography.
I was approved to submit to DepositPhotos Friday, and as such have no photos online with them yet.
If I Opt out of re-seller and affiliate sales, does that protect me in the future, or is the general consensus that DP is going to find another way to act unethically?
Thanks
Jon
This one time we have discovered the fraud. Be sure that other tricks will follow.
340
« on: March 16, 2014, 13:14 »
I'm pretty sure at least one DSLR will survive for a very long time to come, but it may become a niche product for a specialist market.
Yes, and it will be mine
341
« on: March 16, 2014, 13:11 »
I don't see how that can be right. Towards the end of a roll it would have to rewind 30 frames and then wind them back on when you pressed the the shutter for the next one. My Canon 1v certainly doesn't work like that.
It's exactly, how our old Canon Cams work We still use the old cams, because we have to shot color slides sometimes.
Which Canon camera is that? Does it wind the film into a second cassette so the film can be protected as it rewinds after it has been shot? I've never heard of anything like that. Like I say, I've got a Canon 1v film camera (that's the last and best film camera they ever made) and it winds the film onto the camera spool normally and then does a full rewind at the end of the roll. It certainly doesn't repeatedly wind it all to and fro. It has a double lock on the door to prevent accidental opening (you have to press AND slide to open the chamber).
I will look tomorrow. But I'm almost sure, that these Cams are Canon Eos 500 N and 300 N, we still use sometimes. We used about 20 Canon Cameras in the company, about 5 are still in use. If you insert the film, the whole film will completely pulled out. Then the film rewinds frame by frame. Where are you located? Maybe only cams for the european market had this feature ?
342
« on: March 16, 2014, 12:38 »
I don't see how that can be right. Towards the end of a roll it would have to rewind 30 frames and then wind them back on when you pressed the the shutter for the next one. My Canon 1v certainly doesn't work like that.
It's exactly, how our old Canon Cams work  We still use the old cams, because we have to shot color slides sometimes.
343
« on: March 16, 2014, 11:42 »
The problem is- it's impossible to deactivate an account. I wrote at least 4 messages to get my account closed, but it's still active  And even the pictures are just deactivated, not deleted
344
« on: March 16, 2014, 10:34 »
Sorry, double posting
345
« on: March 16, 2014, 10:32 »
Canon vs. Nikon is simply boring - both have made great lenses and cams. I doesn't matter, what particulary brand you use- it makes you not to a good photographer. But both systems make it easier to reach good results. I prefer Nikon for my own photography since 1990. But in my job I use Canon, and the reason for it is simply one feature: In the old analog days, the Canon cameras turned the fim back in the cartridge after each shot (other cameras turned it out) Therefore, the already-exposed photographs were safe when the body should opened accidentally.
346
« on: March 16, 2014, 02:13 »
I totally agree with Uncle Pete. As I wrote before, it seems to me just the peak of an iceberg.
347
« on: March 14, 2014, 15:40 »
The bad thing is, the "Social Media Licence" is connected with the Extended Licence. There is no way, you will need to opt out the EL too, if you don't like offering your pics for use in Facebook etc  It's stupid in my eyes to connect these kind of licences.
348
« on: March 11, 2014, 11:40 »
What do you think, is it a good idea to offer images direct for ShotShop?
Waste of time!
350
« on: March 08, 2014, 12:27 »
There is no why that YAY is top middle tier! The poll results really need some retooling if hired guns or one of two folks, that make a killing, can make a wimpy company like YAY be almost a top tier company...
And it shows two things: 1. MSG is important for agencies like these, 2. they apparently act with such methods
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 ... 22
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|