326
General Stock Discussion / Re: Have you ever been sued?
« on: March 23, 2017, 16:19 »
aaah the forum lawyer
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 326
General Stock Discussion / Re: Have you ever been sued?« on: March 23, 2017, 16:19 »
aaah the forum lawyer
327
General - Top Sites / Re: MEGAPIXELS, resolution: how much does it count?« on: March 23, 2017, 11:31 »
30mb is not 30mp
a 30mp image could easily be under 30mb high resolution images give you the opportunity to crop in different ways and still have enough pixels left for decent size images to submit to the agencies. Nikon's 36mp camera gives you a lot of flexibility. but I find that 22.3mp is enough to play around with also, if you have noisy 36mp images or soft images at 100%, you can reduce the size by 50%, and still have a sharp, noise free appearing image at 18mp 328
Photo Critique / Re: Coffee pics, only natural light - critique request« on: March 23, 2017, 11:26 »
"I still like my crop sensor for "getting closer" to pictures at events, etc, though"
thats funny, because you can do the same with a full frame camera and just crop the photo, unless you use a 18mp crop sensor and need the full resolution image, then i can see the point 329
Photo Critique / Re: Coffee pics, only natural light - critique request« on: March 23, 2017, 09:41 »
i dont like the composition on most of them
331
General - Top Sites / Re: How is this possible ?« on: March 20, 2017, 12:13 »
i just pointed towards those black images in my previous comment.
332
Photo Critique / Re: Disappointed after three months microstock - need advice on whether to keep goin« on: March 20, 2017, 11:56 »
an image sold 6 times across 2 agencies in 3 months and thats your best seller?
if the image has not taken off by now, and doesnt sell daily, dont leave your day job just yet honestly, dont waste more time on this business. 333
General - Top Sites / Re: How is this possible ?« on: March 20, 2017, 11:42 »
black is the new colorful
https://www.shutterstock.com/image-vector/colorful-abstract-background-572030401?src=03_bhvnrwEYlmQ9YihrgHg-1-14 haha and then the similar images, all the same black gradient, unbelievable that this gets through without help on the inside, or it has to be a machine which reviewer lets through a black image with the title colorful ? 334
General Stock Discussion / Re: Papal freeze my account« on: March 19, 2017, 14:32 »
GL dont reply to emails, nothing new. previous owners had much better customer service
335
Shutterstock.com / Re: deleding underperforming images seems a good strategy« on: March 18, 2017, 16:53 »
i think the OP is a bit lost
336
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock testing new pricing plans for customers« on: March 18, 2017, 14:29 »
february rocked, march sucks ass.so much for consistency
337
Shutterstock.com / Re: deleding underperforming images seems a good strategy« on: March 17, 2017, 02:12 »
there's so much wrong in the OP, don't even know where to start. worst advice ever.,
338
GLStock / Re: GL Now Offers Payoneer« on: March 15, 2017, 12:03 »
lol, selling images would be a prerequisite to get paid in the first place
339
General Stock Discussion / Re: I doubt paypal now« on: March 15, 2017, 10:54 »
if anything changed, its either a bug/mistake or change of exchange rates. what currency did you get paid in? i have a dollar account, but any foreign amount paid will sit in the foreign balance, the dollar balance is updated based on the current exchange rate, if the foreign exchange rate changes, then the dollar amount reflects that change
i highly doubt paypal skimming off cents to line their pockets 340
Shutterstock.com / Re: Stolen pictures on shutterstock?« on: March 11, 2017, 20:56 »
special deals, hmmmm where have i heard that before?
has Klein joined shutterstock backroom staff? 341
Off Topic / Re: General Tips for newbies« on: March 10, 2017, 17:36 »
i didn't request anything. just wanted to understand your reasoning.
342
Off Topic / Re: General Tips for newbies« on: March 10, 2017, 17:16 »
why are you so adamant on warning/helping/educating newbies? i never understood the self destructing practice of photographers helping competition, which includes myself at times.
its like coca cola helping cott how to make cola anyway, only those 3 tips? 1. doesnt make sense, i shoot holiday snaps with my DLSR 2. obviously 3. what is a ton of money? you need a good camera and quality lenses at the minimum. its a business, you need to invest to start out. 343
Shutterstock.com / Re: Stolen pictures on shutterstock?« on: March 10, 2017, 14:54 »
how do they both get the model releases?
344
Photo Critique / Re: Disappointed after three months microstock - need advice on whether to keep goin« on: March 09, 2017, 12:38 »
agree, your instagram feed is much better, just watch your tilted horizons, they need to be horizontal
345
Photo Critique / Re: Disappointed after three months microstock - need advice on whether to keep goin« on: March 09, 2017, 03:31 »
why would anyone buy your holiday photos? and if there is one category thats over saturated its travel
your holidays snaps probably wont have commercial value, you only have 100 images, they are average, and then consider competing against 100 million other images, its somewhat comforting to read that people new to the business are struggling though, maybe we finally have reached a saturation point, where people like you give up after 3 months. maybe we are at a point that we can start working towards our balance getting restored. and sales improve again for us who have been in the business for decades sorry to be harsh, but for me its a living, i could do with less competition 346
Shutterstock.com / Re: Keyword spamming being rewarded« on: March 08, 2017, 15:36 »
if I search for eye it doesnt show spam titles
347
Shutterstock.com / Re: Keyword spamming being rewarded« on: March 08, 2017, 09:05 »
not seeing it, plus the new search tab just shows new images, nothing to do with keyword spamming
and the first few rows i checked had frog only once 348
Shutterstock.com / Re: down the toilet« on: March 04, 2017, 03:02 »
i experience SOD sales from 38 cent to 120 dollar, still every month. last month 3 x 60 dollar, and several in the 20-30 range, january 120 dollr + 2 x 90 and several in the 20-30 range
but now i see clip sales of 4 dollar 349
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock has changed the 'Same Artist' section again« on: March 03, 2017, 13:28 »
thats been the case for about 5 years now.
350
Shutterstock.com / Re: weekly 1 million images vs crap« on: March 02, 2017, 09:48 »Quote I just had a quick look at "new" images on love ...the algorithm is returning way too many similars dozens of a girl in a kitchen (59!) and there is some questionable relevance. I'm not a buyer but I would not find that much use at all i actually did the same and fully agree with pauws99 on this subject |
|