|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Peter
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 ... 52
351
« on: October 20, 2008, 11:40 »
tnx all. It took me 17 months to become gold, since I started on FT. But it took a lot of hard work. Fotografer, maybe you are right. I sell average 1 EX per month, so I have nothing to loose. I will put them all to 150, and when I sell one at least I can afford a decent prostitute for a night. LOL. Just joking. 
352
« on: October 20, 2008, 10:06 »
Tnx all. No, when I was silver, I kept them on 50$ (an I could put them to 100), now that I am gold, I will leave them on 50$. When I become emerald, I will put my basic prices to x2.
353
« on: October 20, 2008, 07:11 »
Today I became GOLD rank at FT. 
354
« on: October 19, 2008, 14:52 »
I was accepted at SS at 1st time. 8/10 images. Today I have 5000+ images online.
355
« on: October 19, 2008, 12:01 »
Oh no. Another mouth eating my share of cake. Grats! We made it in our 2nd try
I think you have to wait 24 hours before your images go live, that's pretty standard across all sites right now.
Just remember, Shutterstock is nicknamed The Beast. You gotta feed it often! Best to submit small numbers of files several times a week, rather than one big upload every other week.
Good luck!
Your comment just decreased your earnings by 1%. You make 50 more such comments and your income will drop by 50%. Helping a newbie is like a cuting the branch that you are sitting on. Hehe. For each new photohrapher in the busines, there should be at least 3 new byers to maintain balance in universe.
356
« on: October 18, 2008, 01:13 »
they fixed it today
357
« on: October 17, 2008, 11:20 »
It is interesting that when any site make upgrade, they screw something up.
Why dont they test it on virtual server/network first.
358
« on: October 17, 2008, 08:44 »
i have 346 (in reality 46). but cant be cashed out, lol.
359
« on: October 17, 2008, 08:43 »
i have 346 (in reality 46). but cant be cashed out, lol.
360
« on: October 17, 2008, 04:17 »
what did you expect from crappy site?
361
« on: October 16, 2008, 08:04 »
Waiting since 10-03-2008, should I be worried?
I had payment from 5th october, got the money today.
362
« on: October 16, 2008, 08:03 »
Have the same problem few hours ago. But not it seems to be fixed.
363
« on: October 16, 2008, 08:01 »
I received my payment 14th october. Guess I was lucky.
364
« on: October 15, 2008, 01:04 »
Nobody knows how FT search is working now. One thing is sure: it dones not put older images first.
365
« on: October 14, 2008, 01:12 »
Hi. Tnx fot the link. Today I love my camera! Somehow image quality is very good in real time tests on the field, and with a little touch of noise ninja plugin in PS, it is marvelous! I just love it!
366
« on: October 11, 2008, 01:56 »
Even if I wanted to spam (but I didnt), I couldnt, they even throw away relevant keywords from my images, not to mention possilble irelevant. lol.
367
« on: October 09, 2008, 06:36 »
Genius 611p 3MP idiotic camera.
Canon powershot A530
Canon S3 IS
Canon 400D
Canon 50D
for the future? I dont know. I am ok with 50D, which I bought recently, and dont think of next camera right now.
368
« on: October 08, 2008, 09:11 »
369
« on: October 07, 2008, 14:54 »
I just got acepted images on SS fron 50D (full 15MP, iso 100) good.
370
« on: October 07, 2008, 14:53 »
Xalanx, I shoot in RAW, so any change on camera image style (sharpness, noise reduction, or whatever) does not take any effect on RAW images, only on jpegs.
371
« on: October 07, 2008, 12:28 »
what are you talking about? I did exactly the same images, with same settings with 400D and 50D.
why would I downsize 15MP to 10MP (as 400D!). I bought new camera to get larger images, with BETER quality, but, I just got larger images. Not better quality at all.
and yes, I picked the hardest conditions. But the same setings and same images for both cameras.
372
« on: October 07, 2008, 09:53 »
I will borrow a Canon 60mm macro lens from a friend tomorow, so I will run a few more tests. I send sample files (those peppers) to stock agencies, so far, on StockXpert accepted But I really want to see if SS and IS would accept them. If they do, than 50D is good enough.
373
« on: October 07, 2008, 08:35 »
Might be that huge pixel density on sensor is taking the toll?
What is YOUR opinion? Do you like better what 40D gets, or 50D? Is it worth the change? Why?
I never had 40D. I had 400D (XTi). I dont know. I like everything abour 50D except image quality! (which is most important). If iStock and SS accept my images with 50D, than it is OK. I dont need anything better. If not, well, I might get my old 400D back in service.
374
« on: October 07, 2008, 05:56 »
- same aperture - yes! I use same aperture
- same shutter speed - yes! I use same ss
- same white balance - not so important, but simmilar
- use tripod and remote trigger - did use tripod, but waiting for trigger to arrive, dont have it yet (indor blur)
- no filters on lenses - no filters
- focus exactly in the same spot - manual focus locked after achieving autofokus
- shoot raw and convert with ACR (which you just did) - yes
I still think this can be better with L lens.
375
« on: October 07, 2008, 05:40 »
lightbox test: EOS 50D, ISO 100, f13, RAW   Good enough for goverment work hhhhh
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 ... 52
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
