MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Freedom

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 ... 48
376
General Stock Discussion / Re: iStock Something Is Wrong!!
« on: November 13, 2012, 15:20 »
Sales are slow, no doubt, but I have had sales in the last 4 days. The past October was really bad for me though.

377
No need to panic, Yuri.

You only need:

1. Good lawyers. Do you remember someone got away with murder? Counter claim damages, including punitive damages if Danish law allows it.

2. Good publicist. You must know any publicity is good for your business? Try to keep your own mouth shut, as your lawyers will surely tell you.

378
Only met Andrew briefly, he was a friendly guy with an easy smile. Best wishes to him.

379
Which forum? I could not find it.

380
Payoneer / Re: Be Aware of Payoneer Arbitrary Fees
« on: November 07, 2012, 16:03 »
Hi Nissim, thanks for your offer of help. Will email you later with the specifics.

I clearly remembered that I had withdrawn higher amount, perhaps from other ATM machines. How would a customer know the limits of ATMs from different banks and in different countries? Where do I get the notice that I should not withdraw more than certain amount if it is within my daily limit? It just does not seem to be fair. Say if I have no money in the card but forgot about it, would you be able to charge the fee re decline?

Hi,

The daily cash withdrawal limit for your Payoneer card is $2,500.00.  You also have a separate daily purchase limit of $2,500.00 (total daily limit of $5,000.00).  You certainly were not over the limit; it seems like the ATM is imposing limits of its own per transaction  (as the bank representative explained).

Whenever you try to make a withdrawal from the ATM, the ATM must communicate with Payoneer and our card processor.  Even for a declined transaction, there is a cost incurred by Payoneer, which is why we have a declined ATM withdrawal fee.  It is listed on your My Account pricing and fees page.  (This is not something specific to Payoneer; most credit/debit and prepaid cards will have a similar charge).

That being said, you were clearly unaware that the ATM was imposing these limits.  It's not our intention to penalize you for a declined withdrawal attempt, there's simply a cost of business involved.  If you can e-mail me at nissimal [at] payoneer [dot] com, with the e-mail on your Payoneer account, I'd be more than happy to look in to this and see if there is anything I can do.

381
Payoneer / Re: Be Aware of Payoneer Arbitrary Fees
« on: November 07, 2012, 14:29 »
Local currency.

382
Alamy.com / Re: another typical week at Alamy
« on: November 07, 2012, 13:54 »
I used to get a few refunds, it has not happened in the last couple of years.

383
Payoneer / Be Aware of Payoneer Arbitrary Fees
« on: November 07, 2012, 13:07 »
I tried to withdraw $500 from a bank machine outside the US, and it only allowed me to withdraw $400. I didn't understand because my daily limit was higher than that. Perplexed, I tried to withdraw $500 a few days later, again it only allowed me to take $400. This time, I asked a bank employee, she said it was a limit set by ATM, not because I was over my daily limit. All I needed to do was to withdraw again, as another transaction. Of course, more transactions means multiple ATM charges.

Today, I looked at my Payoneer transactions online. Wow, each time when I tried to withdraw $500, they charge $0.90 for "Fee-ATM Withdrawal International Decline", even though the amount is totally within my daily limit and there was plenty money in the card. I must have tried three times, because it was listed three times. Not the amount was huge, but it is a rip off, I must say.

Did it happen to anyone else? I didn't know any other credit/debit cards do this.

384
Off Topic / Re: Photographer on holiday dilema
« on: October 05, 2012, 12:51 »
I would take fisheye and 50mm (or 135mm). You can get nice wide angle landscape from fisheye, and portraits of your wife and general shots from 50mm or 135mm.

385
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Is your September down?
« on: September 23, 2012, 14:10 »
OK, fairy nuff.I personally wouldn't set too much store by some of the whinging here, whilst I agree there is a fair amount to whinge about, some of the complaints here border on the ludicrous IMHO. Low commission, have you seen what SS pay? Bugs exist everywhere ( again, see SS complaints), key wording? I don't see a problem there particularly, the release policy? You need a release for figures, is that a problem? Sales down, a lot of people here say they're down everywhere. I'd actually prefer new people not to sign up as IS, but you have to read between the lines here as far as comments go.

What about the whinging (or whining?) on the istock forum? Sure, there are some problems on every site, but most sites, it's rare and they are fixed in a reasonable amt of time. At istock they are the norm, and sometimes don't ever get fixed, in fact even get worse.

I have also seen an increase in my SS sales, right after I pulled my images from istock. Do my sales at SS go up and down? Of course, but there were months where I didn't even make payout, and since I dropped istock (which coincides with about the time the buyers "left in droves") I have always made payout + more. And I'm not even adding any new images. That tells me something.

I have no doubt it told you something when you were an active contributor. Since then, you have not had any first hand experience about iStock, right?

My September has not been as good as I hoped, due to Labor Day and site issues. But last week was decent. I hope the trend continues.

And your point is?   ::) My comment was about how MY sales on SS went up, when MY port on IS went off. My conclusions are based on when I was an active contributor (first hand experience from the not too distant past), like many other contributors commenting here. Chill, dude. Stop trying to be a bully.

My point is, chill, and do not stay angry. Your anger against iS from many months ago may prevent you from offering an objective opinion of today and mislead others. Of course, you don't care because IS is irrelevant to you. Does it make me a bully? I'll let Leaf decide.  :o

 :D You're so funny!

Thank you!  ;D

386
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Is your September down?
« on: September 23, 2012, 12:05 »
OK, fairy nuff.I personally wouldn't set too much store by some of the whinging here, whilst I agree there is a fair amount to whinge about, some of the complaints here border on the ludicrous IMHO. Low commission, have you seen what SS pay? Bugs exist everywhere ( again, see SS complaints), key wording? I don't see a problem there particularly, the release policy? You need a release for figures, is that a problem? Sales down, a lot of people here say they're down everywhere. I'd actually prefer new people not to sign up as IS, but you have to read between the lines here as far as comments go.

What about the whinging (or whining?) on the istock forum? Sure, there are some problems on every site, but most sites, it's rare and they are fixed in a reasonable amt of time. At istock they are the norm, and sometimes don't ever get fixed, in fact even get worse.

I have also seen an increase in my SS sales, right after I pulled my images from istock. Do my sales at SS go up and down? Of course, but there were months where I didn't even make payout, and since I dropped istock (which coincides with about the time the buyers "left in droves") I have always made payout + more. And I'm not even adding any new images. That tells me something.

I have no doubt it told you something when you were an active contributor. Since then, you have not had any first hand experience about iStock, right?

My September has not been as good as I hoped, due to Labor Day and site issues. But last week was decent. I hope the trend continues.

And your point is?   ::) My comment was about how MY sales on SS went up, when MY port on IS went off. My conclusions are based on when I was an active contributor (first hand experience from the not too distant past), like many other contributors commenting here. Chill, dude. Stop trying to be a bully.

My point is, chill, and do not stay angry. Your anger against iS from many months ago may prevent you from offering an objective opinion of today and mislead others. Of course, you don't care because IS is irrelevant to you. Does it make me a bully? I'll let Leaf decide.  :o

387
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Is your September down?
« on: September 22, 2012, 19:01 »
OK, fairy nuff.I personally wouldn't set too much store by some of the whinging here, whilst I agree there is a fair amount to whinge about, some of the complaints here border on the ludicrous IMHO. Low commission, have you seen what SS pay? Bugs exist everywhere ( again, see SS complaints), key wording? I don't see a problem there particularly, the release policy? You need a release for figures, is that a problem? Sales down, a lot of people here say they're down everywhere. I'd actually prefer new people not to sign up as IS, but you have to read between the lines here as far as comments go.

What about the whinging (or whining?) on the istock forum? Sure, there are some problems on every site, but most sites, it's rare and they are fixed in a reasonable amt of time. At istock they are the norm, and sometimes don't ever get fixed, in fact even get worse.

I have also seen an increase in my SS sales, right after I pulled my images from istock. Do my sales at SS go up and down? Of course, but there were months where I didn't even make payout, and since I dropped istock (which coincides with about the time the buyers "left in droves") I have always made payout + more. And I'm not even adding any new images. That tells me something.

I have no doubt it told you something when you were an active contributor. Since then, you have not had any first hand experience about iStock, right?

My September has not been as good as I hoped, due to Labor Day and site issues. But last week was decent. I hope the trend continues.

388
Software - General / Re: Hot/Dead pixel
« on: September 20, 2012, 10:52 »
Dead pixel is common if you have used your camera for a while. Continuous shooting and long exposure are overheating the sensor, in addition to the normal wear and tear.

The simplest way is to send it to Canon for remapping.

389
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Is your September down?
« on: September 18, 2012, 14:09 »
I am not surprised September is not as good as we hope because IS is tweaking the site. This is not a good time of the year to carry out site improvement.

My September is better than the summer months but it will not reach the level of the spring months.

390
Alamy.com / Re: 2 Alamy Commissions deducted?
« on: September 18, 2012, 07:50 »
Like it is said, it is a distribution sale. Yes, it was sold through a partner/distributor.

391
General Stock Discussion / Re: How are your RM files doing?
« on: September 17, 2012, 23:51 »
I rarely uploaded to Alamy in the past three years. Still get sales, but the prices are much much lower, my income is 1/3 of what it was.

392
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Istock vs others
« on: September 17, 2012, 23:27 »
With due respect, JoAnn and Lisa, I think prolonged anger sometimes affects one's judgement and fairness.  A calm and objective voice may deliver better credibility than an angry one.

You yourself said that your income is increasing at iStock. That's no bad thing, congratulations indeed. However it could be argued that thereby your 'more positive than average' comments about iStock are also not being totally 'objective'.
It's more difficult when iStock's business decisions have caused a direct and ongoing reduction in income, which many people have experienced.

SS, my income increase is a fact. How can a fact not be objective? I had said this to you before, and am repeating, I think I have benefited from E+, and not increased DLs. My DLs have decreased, just like yours. Again, that is a fact.

393
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Istock vs others
« on: September 17, 2012, 16:02 »

There are a number of long term contributors, exclusives, independents plus some like me who've done the indie-exclusive-indie shuffle, who are deeply angry with iStock. In my case it's fury at greed throwing away something really great - and some of that anger can spill over into impatience with newer exclusives who haven't yet had anything bad happen. IS's ongoing software incompetence - bungling every software upgrade (and I do mean every single one) and continuing to pick dreadful times to cripple site operations - is a pretty rational rock to throw at them.

 I think there's also a periodic burst of "exclusive content is better than all that rubbish on the other sites" which certainly doesn't sit well with anyone but a subset of exclusives. Probably not reasonable to assume that all exclusives feel that way about indies, but it has certainly primed the pump for some "full and frank exchanges of views" to become dust ups. There's a ton of ill will towards Getty that rubs off on IS more and more as it's absorbed into the parent company.

This is just me, but although I largely ignore what IS is up to these days, if I think about them too much I can get angry again very easily. Hearing all the positive and optimistic chat from current exclusives (who need to believe they've made a wise choice in picking exclusivity) seems to be very dismissive of those who got hurt by the past lies and about faces on a number of business issues. Probably isn't deliberately planned that way, but for anyone without the history, might take them by surprise.

On another forum (no longer around) I was told I was in need of a mental health evaluation for considering exclusivity :) Some people feel very strongly about spreading the risk and that's not anti IS, but they're the only agency where even considering exclusivity makes any sense.

Very well put JoAnn.  Sums up the situation perfectly, along with some of the history that got us to this point . 

@Reef, I was not being sarcastic or hostile.  My interpretation of "animosity" is personal attacks.  I do see quite a bit of people extremely upset with Istock, but I have not seen a lot of personal attacks on other members, certainly none that I can point to in this thread.  Which is why I was asking for links.

With due respect, JoAnn and Lisa, I think prolonged anger sometimes affects one's judgement and fairness.  A calm and objective voice may deliver better credibility than an angry one.

394
$2800 for a fixed lens camera? what is SONY smoking.

+1

395
Does anyone know Starbuck's profit margins?

Does anyone know how much or a percentage a coffee farmer gets from a cup of coffee?

396
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Istock vs others
« on: September 11, 2012, 19:21 »
I am not entirely happy with what I get from my exclusivity and I don't think I owe IS any favor to defend it, but IS is still generating reasonable returns for my efforts.  Jsnover, you have been trying to be fair in most of your messages. I wish I can say the same about few other people who should really consider to have some more balanced and fair views.

397
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Istock vs others
« on: September 11, 2012, 14:04 »
For whatever reason, my E+ images are not selling well anymore. A couple of days ago, one regular XS file only generated less than $1, while other XS regular sales will likely fetch more than twice as much. I have surpassed my current RC target but it will be nearly impossible to reach a higher level unless I have a lot of E+, V&A sales before the end of the year.

398
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Istock vs others
« on: September 10, 2012, 14:47 »
Well, my exclusivity was planned long before RC was announced. That being said, I doubt if I would do better had I stayed independent, given all the complaints I read about other sites. Did IS meet my expectation? Heck no.

399
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Istock vs others
« on: September 09, 2012, 07:39 »
September has always been my best month of the year. I just have to keep my fingers crossed and hope for a miracle for this year.

400
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Istock vs others
« on: September 08, 2012, 21:13 »
I agree with Sue.

I became exclusive about the time when RC was announced and have since advanced to a higher RC level. I had some good months before the summer slump and thought I had a good chance to advance to an even higher level. But the slow first week of September does not look promising to me, plus E+, V&A have slowed down too. I am not considering to be independent any time soon and hope, wishfully maybe, that IS will pick up.

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 ... 48

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors