3976
Veer / Re: Did the upload limits change?
« on: June 06, 2012, 09:04 »
25 too.. pictures waiting for review for over a month.. 1 month is usual there but more than that is just too much no Veer?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 3976
Veer / Re: Did the upload limits change?« on: June 06, 2012, 09:04 »
25 too.. pictures waiting for review for over a month.. 1 month is usual there but more than that is just too much no Veer?
3977
Featurepics.com / Re: Any Sales Recently?« on: June 05, 2012, 23:07 »2 sales in 2010 from 35 cents to 3$, still haven't got to a payout after 3 years and 2 months, that said 35.2$ for 25 sales 3978
Shutterstock.com / Re: Strange rules/rejection at SS« on: June 05, 2012, 22:46 »I have a little bit of inside first hand knowledge that you will not like what you are going to hear about rejections and the reviewers and the process. Well it looks like a few of the Snobs with your greater then God attitude finally got what you wanted. is this what you talking about? 3979
Featurepics.com / Re: Any Sales Recently?« on: June 05, 2012, 22:34 »
2 sales in 2010
8 sales in 2011 15 sales in 2012 3980
Dreamstime.com / Re: editorial issues in DT« on: June 05, 2012, 22:30 »Whenever I have a lot of photos from a single shoot, I submit them in batches over a period of a year. Avoids the dreaded "too many" rejections. no it doesn´t, they look in your portfolio, they go back and search those keywords, if they find they will say you have already online.. (talking about too many or similar rejections) 3982
Dreamstime.com / editorial issues in DT« on: June 05, 2012, 09:33 »
I would love to understand some agencies but its kind of hard actually.. DT is on the top of that list for sure..
I have recently shoot a rally in Ireland I went to watch, over 50 cars on 3 different places... that said I have uploaded to SS which have approved all of them, same goes for 123RF, DP and a few other too.. only DT has now a new rejection type: Please submit only those images from this series that fit the event better. We consider that 3-5 images per event can tell the full story, and by submitting less you will certainly focus on quality (this is always preferred) while covering up an event. another problem is their approval ratio which hurts when we have more rejections.. for the first batch 70 pictures, 34 got rejected.. not to mention they took over 10 days to review them.. yep I know they (rally pics) won´t make me rich, no need to tell me 3983
General Stock Discussion / Re: theartofbusinesscards.com« on: June 04, 2012, 23:10 »I guess it sounds like another Zazzle - a way to spend hours creating and tweaking designs which become needles in a giant haystack. I was hoping that you would not turn down another "agency" but yep same old story ![]() 3984
Adobe Stock / Re: Has there been a big increase in sales volumes at FT?« on: June 04, 2012, 21:18 »basically FT works in 2 ways: I see but it doesn´t make any sense looking at some of the latest people pictures approved, not going to point out those cases once it would be quite unpolite, agencies take big naps sometimes 3985
General Stock Discussion / Re: theartofbusinesscards.com« on: June 04, 2012, 21:11 »There was a similar thread last week: exactly, people should do some research before openning another topic, there is a search feature on the top bar 3986
Dreamstime.com / Re: buyer wanting "raw" file« on: June 04, 2012, 21:10 »No way, don't do it! They can change the metadata and claim the image as their own. That is a shocking request in my opinion. it may be shocking but its available on DT for a long time.. 3987
Adobe Stock / Re: Has there been a big increase in sales volumes at FT?« on: June 04, 2012, 13:57 »
basically FT works in 2 ways:
- isolations (whatever it is) - people subjects like travel (cities, landmarks) sometimes get over too, nature/landscape is even harder.. 3989
General Stock Discussion / Re: May Microstock Income - How was it?« on: June 03, 2012, 18:38 »
ahah cool stuff, I will follow you, no worries! ![]() 3990
Shutterstock.com / Re: Its ALL! about SS, isnt it?« on: June 03, 2012, 18:20 »Everything is fine in my microstock world these days.. I don't see reason for drastic measurements! I pretty much agree, I have worked 6 days in May, when I say have worked is basically the days I have edited pics and keyword, not uploading or shooting.. that said what concerns me is what income I will have on the following months and that is quite hard to predict despite bme etc... 3991
Off Topic / Re: Recommend a movie (2011/2012 if possible)« on: June 03, 2012, 17:51 »
I am a big movie fan too, watch almost daily one or two, from the last I recommend:
- Michael Clayton - The Descendants - Shutter Island - Hunter - Larry Crowne - Red - Ghost Writer - Girl with the dragon tattoo 3992
Off Topic / Re: Recommend a movie (2011/2012 if possible)« on: June 03, 2012, 17:44 »Hunger Games is surprisingly good with a second layer of meaning that is very interesting. Recommended. Dark Shadows was very dissapointing.. the argument is weak in my opinion, the make up, direction, photography, wardrobe are quite interesting, I was hoping for a lot more.. 3993
Adobe Stock / Re: Has there been a big increase in sales volumes at FT?« on: June 01, 2012, 17:53 »My weekly rank used to often be in the top 500 and this week it's 5,700. Whatever they've done with the search, it must of buried my portfolio. I never had mine like I have today and I am sure I am no near your sales I guess Ranking Overall rank 4,380 7 day rank 1,000 3994
Adobe Stock / Re: Where to find rejection reasons with Fotolia« on: June 01, 2012, 15:27 »
guess not, actually I mostly care about rejections at SS/IS, only agencies I do resubmit
3995
Adobe Stock / Re: Has there been a big increase in sales volumes at FT?« on: June 01, 2012, 15:14 »
downloads (RPD)
Jan 2012 118 (0.76$) Feb 2012 152 (0.70$) Mar 2012 169 (0.61$) Apr 2012 136 (0.70$) May 2012 170 (0.60$) 3996
Dreamstime.com / Re: DT - Timelineimages.com for facebook« on: June 01, 2012, 13:39 »
it would be interesting to see which pictures we will sell for FB, at least it would be easier to control, that said we aren´t paid for that..
if a blogger gets a picture for his FB and then use it on his blog how will DT control such thing? (I guess this ain´t allowed right?) 3997
General Stock Discussion / Re: May Microstock Income - How was it?« on: June 01, 2012, 12:33 »I was so close to passing Shutterstock this month. A couple more sales would have done it. Maybe, next month. really amazing! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 3998
General Stock Discussion / Re: May Microstock Income - How was it?« on: June 01, 2012, 10:15 »A rise of $400 in 5 months, keep up the pace Louis! and thanks again for being amongst the very few who actually post their numbers on the last six months I haven´t uploaded that much, the last 2 I have been traveling a lot in Ireland, thats very true Wim, that said I got around 600 approved at SS but over 200 were approved just a couple of weeks ago which are editorial from a rally I went to see/shoot 3999
Dreamstime.com / Re: DT - Timelineimages.com for facebook« on: May 31, 2012, 23:06 »I find it hard to believe people will use a purchased photo for something as personal as FB, but we'll see. why do you find it hard? I see tons of people using pictures with DT, IS watermark on FB, every day I see many, its just insane actually and I am talking about people and all fan pages, all that crap.. I am sure this 3 free per user will be used massively, I really wish it doesn´t hurt our potential sales once there are many bloggers and such using FB.. how will DT control this license? 4000
New Sites - General / Re: Pocketstock...???« on: May 31, 2012, 21:29 »Anyone know anything about these guys?? not much, only that a ton of top contributors have already joined ![]() |
Submit Your Vote
|