MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - KB
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 ... 57
401
« on: March 28, 2014, 13:30 »
It's really premature to place this thread in "Sites that no longer exist", isn't it? 
Finally someone who has noticed...
And no, it is not. This is well known scenario, after small or zero sales, no payments, no communication...
Really then there should be a Not doing well, but are trying hard and with some luck who knows category.
That sounds better. And we can put ClipDealer and Revostock in there (among those I contribute to). Well, except for the communication part.
402
« on: March 28, 2014, 10:32 »
It's really premature to place this thread in "Sites that no longer exist", isn't it?
403
« on: March 19, 2014, 23:22 »
The 15th fell on a weekend. I got mine on Monday the 17th. Seems reasonable. Gee, that's interesting. I got mine on the 15th (which did surprise me a bit). Maybe they favor the old contributors?
404
« on: March 17, 2014, 17:21 »
It might be interesting to have an Exclusive thread every once in a while. Everyone could read it and learn, but only photographers with portfolio links could post on it. Real Microstockers talking to real Microstockers.
I don't understand your minus, I think it is a great idea actually
I'm not a real Microstocker because I want to remain anonymous?
405
« on: March 17, 2014, 16:52 »
I didn't even realize they were speedometers. 
That's what I call 'em.  The official forum term seems to be 'gauge'.
406
« on: March 17, 2014, 16:51 »
I actually have no idea how the speedometers work or how to read them. They mean zip to me. How do you choose or choose not to use them?
They exist only for IS & DT portfolios. They appear by entering your Username on your Forum Profile page in the box next to the site's name. That's the box you enter to make your portfolio links available, but there is a checkbox provided that allows you to not display your portfolio links (letting you enter this info and still show the gauges). They give an indication of how the username is doing relative to that site's smallest and biggest contributors, by number of sales and perhaps port size (I forget).
407
« on: March 17, 2014, 15:55 »
I understand the fear of retaliation, but I think the anonymous folks should know that being anonymous in any forum greatly diminishes the value some folks will place on their comments. Especially in this business, where we talk about levels of success, portfolio performance, etc., knowing where the comments about those things come from can be extremely important. There is a world of difference between someone saying they are having problems getting new images to sell at whatever agency for example when that person has 10 images in their portfolio or 10,000. Even the kind of work people do is important contextual information in any discussion here, and without that it is often really difficult to gauge the significance of a comment.
I understand and agree this is a problem with being anonymous. The speedometers give at least a little hint as to whether someone is a complete novice, one of the top tier, or somewhere in between. Though it seems their use has somewhat grown out of favor recently, for some reason. Even if one has portfolio links, I think the meters give a quick visual cue as to the poster's ranking, and I wish more people would use them. As an IS exclusive, I wouldn't write many of the posts that I do if I couldn't be anonymous. Being totally dependent on one site (owned by a company that seems determined to run it into the ground), it would be even more stupid to make negative comments about them that could result in retaliation of some kind. I'd rather not post than have to post non-anonymously.
408
« on: March 15, 2014, 10:35 »
Most embeddable pictures are newsworthy stuff, sports, prominent people.
Yes, I still believe that Getty should ask their contributors before makings such decisions: An opt-in solution. Plus feed back the data they gathered with my images. Then I wouldn't see any reason to complain at all.
I certainly agree with your last paragraph. But I will wait and see how much impact this has on my portfolio. I have only a few hundred files at Getty, all of which are embeddable, many of which make sense only in an editorial context (even though they are not editorial files themselves). They add about 10% - 20% to my IS income, so not a huge deal by itself but with IS sales dropping like they have been, every bit helps. If my GI sales disappear, it will hurt.
409
« on: March 14, 2014, 16:14 »
Go to iStock.
Completely off-topic, and certainly not Tickstock's meaning, so I apologize in advance.
But am I the only one who read that as "Go to hell"?
Again, sorry.
LOL, it wasn't meant like that. The royalties are listed on the iStock website, not the thinkstock website. I was being lazy, I didn't want to go find the link but here it is: http://www.istockphoto.com/help/sell-stock/rate-schedule
Of course I knew that. It's just that sometimes I feel I am in (microstock) hell, so telling someone to "go to iStock" equated in my mind to ....
410
« on: March 14, 2014, 10:32 »
Go to iStock.
Completely off-topic, and certainly not Tickstock's meaning, so I apologize in advance. But am I the only one who read that as " Go to hell"? Again, sorry.
411
« on: March 13, 2014, 10:27 »
So I fully expect that credit sales will plummet even further (much further) than they have.
They will enroll the new iStock sub. model in April. It will take 2-3 months for a buyers to finish their current credit balances and to switch to the new sub. model... I expect in June with summer slowdown we will see a huge drop in revenue and massive exodus of exclusives from iStock flooding the market with their ports.
Excellent point; it will take time for many credit buyers to use up their credits before switching over to subs. So we'll probably see an extended period where sales drop off more and more, gradually at first, and then accelerating. Not something I'm looking forward to.
412
« on: March 13, 2014, 07:05 »
<snip> they'll be 75 cents and $2.50. Not great at all but not Shutterstock levels yet.
Of course this is all speculation on my part, but I don't think sales volume will be SS levels, either.
Unless IS is somehow successful in luring away SS buyers (I hope so for my sake, but highly doubt it), what's going to happen is that the new sub sales are going to come from whatever few new buyers they can attract, but mostly from existing IS buyers that they convert to subscriptions. Who would be interested in that? The buyers who buy the most files now. So I fully expect that credit sales will plummet even further. Like I said, purely guesswork. But educated guesswork, IMO. And I do expect to be proven correct in the next few months. 
So what would you do? Drop the exclusivity and contribute to other agencies?
I haven't made up my mind what I'm going to do. I'm too disgusted at the moment to think straight. I was independent for several years before becoming exclusive (taking advantage of IS's bait & switch grandfathering ploy). One of my main reasons for doing so was that I did not like giving away so many files at maximum sizes for subscription prices. How ironic. Starting over from scratch with my so-so portfolio (except at SS, where my port is in limbo) -- honestly isn't much of an option. So I have no idea what I'm going to do.
413
« on: March 12, 2014, 17:36 »
<snip> they'll be 75 cents and $2.50. Not great at all but not Shutterstock levels yet.
Of course this is all speculation on my part, but I don't think sales volume will be SS levels, either. Unless IS is somehow successful in luring away SS buyers (I hope so for my sake, but highly doubt it), what's going to happen is that the new sub sales are going to come from whatever few new buyers they can attract, but mostly from existing IS buyers that they convert to subscriptions. Who would be interested in that? The buyers who buy the most files now. So I fully expect that credit sales will plummet even further ( much further) than they have. And despite SS' Jon's assertion that 99.9% of their business is commercial, my own portfolio definitely has a large portion of non-commercial sales. So I also expect that many of those non-commercial buyers will decide to take advantage of Getty's giveaway, hitting my port with a double-whammy that it will never recover from. Like I said, purely guesswork. But educated guesswork, IMO. And I do expect to be proven correct in the next few months.
415
« on: March 12, 2014, 09:52 »
Here's a link to a The Verge article about it: http://www.theverge.com/2014/3/12/5499584/malaysia-airlines-flight-mh370-searchThe link is legit. Colorado-based DigitalGlobe has sent two of its satellites to survey the Gulf of Thailand and the South China Sea, targeting areas that haven't been covered by other satellites or where inclement weather could have hindered previous attempts. The company is also looking at the Strait of Malacca, after (disputed) reports yesterday suggested that the aircraft could have traveled far off course. The company's images should be available online by early Wednesday, where volunteers will be able to help scan them.
The images will be published on Tomnod, a crowdsourcing site where users help identify debris from natural disasters or other incidents. After DigitalGlobe published its first satellite images on Monday, the site saw an unprecedented influx of traffic more than 500,000 unique visitors within 24 hours forcing it to reboot its servers. According to DigitalGlobe senior manager Luke Barrington, 100,000 users scanned the first images, collectively examining each pixel 100 times over.However, all the traffic has crashed their servers, and so they were down the last I checked.
416
« on: March 11, 2014, 21:49 »
The official line was you are not supposed to use DM for any resubmital, editorial or not.
But I think the days of anyone caring about that are long over, so the thing to do is just load a new copy of the file in DM, then <ctrl>C <ctrl>V the old file's contents into the new file, edit the new file, and then just send it as a new upload.
417
« on: March 07, 2014, 11:04 »
An open letter to photographers
https://www.picfair.com/posts/an-open-letter-to-photographers
Why does this get so many positive recs? It seems to be saying what a lot of the posts that get negative recs are saying: The web is awash with news that Getty is giving away all of its images for free. Relax. It isn't. Your work has not suddenly become worthless.
This is what has changed: people who were previously not paying for Getty images, and were never going to ... will continue not paying for Getty images.
Bloggers can now legally embed Getty image into their sites for non-commercial use. These images are a chunk of real estate that Getty can make money from at a later date. It fails to consider that 1000s (10000s?) of bloggers who did pay for images no longer have to, as well as the possibility (yet unrealized) that editorial sites will switch to free images. I think it's very short-sighted to believe that this changes nothing.
418
« on: March 06, 2014, 17:10 »
It's a marketing experiment ... in the very worst scenario 0.1% of these clicks will make a new sale so what do you guys know
You think converting 1 in a 1000 clicks is the worst scenario? Whatever you're on, I'd like some of that, please.
419
« on: March 06, 2014, 12:56 »
SSTK is down almost 4% today on the heels of GI's announcement to make their 35 million files available for free.
It will be interesting to see where it goes from here. Does it recover, or is last week's high of 103.01 going to prove to have been the top?
If I had to bet, I'd be selling here.
420
« on: March 03, 2014, 20:35 »
Because what the world needs is another low priced subscription model.
I'm not so sure it will be low priced. Only low paying.
421
« on: March 03, 2014, 20:14 »
If we exclusives needed another reason to think the end is near, this is it. 36c or 75c sales for XXXL sizes?  It's inevitable now. SS is going to see quite an influx of new contributors.
422
« on: February 25, 2014, 11:43 »
You are missing the point, they DO refund images well over 14 days, but when its in favor of the contrib they stick to their 14 day period.
That's a bit unlikely, don't you think? I mean, considering that IS gets 85% of a sale, isn't it they who lose out the most with a policy such as this? I think it's most likely that they have a policy of allowing refunds to big buyers whenever they ask, regardless of whether they want to buy a bigger file, smaller file, or no file at all. But for most buyers, especially smaller ones, they won't bend on the 2-week limit, even for something as sensible as crediting towards a larger file. They're idiots, and they've proven it countless times.
423
« on: February 13, 2014, 17:52 »
Again, CC is dead. Simple as that.
I had my first sale in several months a few weeks back. I'm still hoping they make it, somehow.
425
« on: February 05, 2014, 18:39 »
That one looks ok (and for the price, very good). I think that aspect ratio (1920x1080, 16:9) is a bit less appealing than 1920x1200 (16:10). I find the extra vertical pixels to be very helpful.
But it's an IPS panel using LED back-lighting, so at least the display should be decent enough (though it may need calibration for accurate color rendering). This one has HDMI, VGA, & DVI input ports, so it should be good to go. If you choose another, make sure it has the input port that your current computer cable supports, or you'll need a new cable or adapter. Bring the cable along if you aren't sure what type it is.
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 ... 57
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|