|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Peter
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 ... 52
426
« on: September 22, 2008, 00:33 »
Overall rank 211
7 days rank 96
under 100 
dropped a little bit in last few days... Overall rank 210 7 days rank 175
427
« on: September 22, 2008, 00:32 »
It takes too long now. I need that money, I collected over 250 now, and I need it. I hope it will be this week.
428
« on: September 20, 2008, 17:11 »
take a look at CAs at cheap plastic 50mm f1.8, there are none!  In real life photos you can live with that yeah, tell that to Istock reviewers, lol
429
« on: September 20, 2008, 15:20 »
24-70 2.8L is much better lens than 24-105, but even 24-70 suffers from chromatic aberation  
430
« on: September 20, 2008, 13:28 »
I compared it with one lens that I had, and didnt liked it because it was too soft - canon 70-300 IS. but acording to this test, at 70mm, big one is sharped than this L lens (at f8)! And I dindnt like that 70-300! LOL!
And this 24-105 produces a lot of chomatic aberations, thats not good at all.
432
« on: September 20, 2008, 10:33 »
I know that, I am ok with 1.6x crop factor.
I am just wondering is it worth to pay 4x more money for slightly better lens? Or that lens is really that much better?
433
« on: September 20, 2008, 10:25 »
yeah, but 28-105 is cheap lens (250eur), and 24-105 is L glass (1100eur)! how much sharper is that 24-105 L comparing to 28-105. Most important things are: sharpness, precise focusing, and low chromatic aberations (prurple fringe). Is it worth to give about 1000$ (i would sell my old one) for that lens, comparing to 28-105 non-L glass?
434
« on: September 20, 2008, 10:04 »
Is it a good idea to use Canon 24-105mm f4 L IS USM lens, that is made for FF sensors, on APS-C sensor (like on EOS 400D or EOS 50D).
I have 28-105mm f3.5-4.5 USM II lens, but thinking of buying 24-105mm L lens. I do not have (and probably will not have in next 2 years) FF sensor camera.
Is it a good idea?
435
« on: September 18, 2008, 14:03 »
Only if I sell my kindey. To expensive for me. But I will buy new EOS 50D in January 2009.
436
« on: September 18, 2008, 06:01 »
Yep, I will wait as well. What do I have to loose if I will wait a year or two longer? The only time I waste on yay is checking once a month for sales and write this forum post 
I simply dont want to do business like that. I work hard to produce images, and I expect money. If there is no serious income, I wont do it. I am not doing this for hobby.
437
« on: September 18, 2008, 05:58 »
they have been for 5 months. I was present with my portfolio in jun, july, august and now september. no sales at all.
If I dont want to waste time on BXP, I certanly dont want to waste it on even lower YAYmicro.
I also stopped uploading on 123rf, but wont close account.
438
« on: September 18, 2008, 05:54 »
I wrote to customer support, to close my account at YAY, and delete my 3000+ images I uploaded. In 4 months, only 2 sales. That is ridiculous. They can keep the money, I dont want to waste any of my time on that site. My biggest mistake in microstock world. But learned lesson: never upload on new sites, if they are not offering money per upload.
439
« on: September 17, 2008, 01:48 »
awesome!
ps.
is it a full frame sensor?
440
« on: September 16, 2008, 11:56 »
i think it is more fair this way. new and old images have chances.
441
« on: September 16, 2008, 08:51 »
You are right! This morning, for certain keywords, I had 6-7 images on 1st page. 7 hours later, I cant find them on first 5 pages, found few on 6th page.
Your theory is right. Bravo!
442
« on: September 16, 2008, 06:29 »
on FT you can manualy delete your images, one by one. or send support a message to delete them for you.
443
« on: September 16, 2008, 04:06 »
i convert RAW to sRGB jpeg.
444
« on: September 16, 2008, 01:56 »
Nice theory. Only it has to be proven. I might do a few searches of my own images, and see what happens.
445
« on: September 15, 2008, 09:13 »
I upload about 50 new images every week, and see no boost in sales. That worries me.
446
« on: September 15, 2008, 09:00 »
what is going on with SS? lower and lower sales each week.
are there too many photographers, and too little buyers?
I think all other sites took some of subs buyers from SS, when they introduced their subs plan.
447
« on: September 14, 2008, 12:52 »
I always shoot on ISO 100, and never remove any noise. When I have to remove some of it, because of hi-ISO, I use neat image.
448
« on: September 13, 2008, 05:33 »
one thing is certain - it does not have built in flash. so it is not 50D
449
« on: September 12, 2008, 05:51 »
Is it going to be faster in RAW conversions?
450
« on: September 11, 2008, 12:33 »
Actually I am glad they are closing. I registered few months ago, sold 0. Dont like them. I whish every site closes, except: FT, SS, DT, StockXpert, IS and 123rf, that would increase or sales, this way small sites are just taking away customers.....
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 ... 52
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
