pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - FD

Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23 24 ... 82
451
StockFresh / Re: StockFresh - from Peter Hamza and Andras Pfaff
« on: October 06, 2010, 14:14 »
Warning to all continentals: never try to wiggle yourselves to the front of a queue with a British person in it. You'll hurt yourself!  ;)
1) My umbrella is much stronger.
2) In most un-british places in the world, the Britt will be alone standing in the queue wondering what all those uneducated savages are fighting for in front of him.  :P

452
General Stock Discussion / Re: Fotegrafic : asian microstock
« on: October 06, 2010, 14:06 »
but what turns me off is that they are choosing to do business in the US Dollar, not exactly the currency of the future.
With the wild exchange rate shifts of the past year, the USD limits the risk for the customer and fee management is easier.
It's weird they didn't reply to your inquiry. Perhaps it's a one man joint that put up a front ("partner") for Blend Images?

453
Bigstock.com / Re: Locked out of account at bigstock
« on: October 06, 2010, 13:52 »
On the subject (but not on-topic ;) ), I am surprised by how many offers I get to shoot nude or glamour photographs.  I have ZERO interest in shooting that stuff, but people seem so shocked when I turn them down...
Ah, you too? I get turned off when I see nudity on a model site. The more nude a model wants to be, the more unable to act and look nextdoor. Glamor is fine in a TFP shoot, on condition I can do my shots first. It happens they run off after the glamor claiming they are "too tired" for the "boring" stuff.

454
General Photography Discussion / Re: Retouching
« on: October 06, 2010, 13:38 »
2$, both in Chennai (India) and the Southern Philippines (the only countries in the area that have English as a second language). The issue is remote QC. You also have to double that sum for overhead (good monitor, PC, UPS, fast internet). The issue here is most of those freelancers don't have any capital to put upfront and they use old burned out 3-d hand monitors. In general, Indians have very good and consistent work ethics. If in doubt, go for an Indian since their IT skills are superb too.

455
StockFresh / Re: StockFresh - from Peter Hamza and Andras Pfaff
« on: October 06, 2010, 12:19 »
For me Stockfresh approach makes sense, it is just a shame the queue order was not respected :(
Queues are too British! We continentals wiggle ourself in front using dirty tricks like claiming we are just going to ask a quick question ;-)

456
General Stock Discussion / Re: Fotegrafic : asian microstock
« on: October 06, 2010, 12:14 »
http://www.fotegrafik.com
They are specialised in asian subjects. seems they have many quality in stock.
Don't know if they have many customers yet.

They are based in Singapore, the only location I trust in SE Asia. Thanks for the heads up. I'll call them when I'm back in the area there next week. What you saw is mostly from Blend Images. Their own content looks like tourist snapshots in Asia. I'm inclined to give them a chance since I tend to get fed up with the rush downward of microstock.

457
But once people discover this, the game is over.
Yuri is on Photaki with almost all of his port. So you can forget it.  ;)

458
General Stock Discussion / Re: Woohooo! Thanks Dreamstime !!!!
« on: October 06, 2010, 08:23 »
I've received a mail on Dreamstime 2 days ago who informed me I was the featured contributor of the week.
What?? You aren't Russian and still featured???  :P
Well deserved, great artsy portolio.

459
Monopods are great for sports if you have a heavy set-up that you want to swivel too and fro, they are not for model shoots. Perhaps Yuri just wants to hamper all his potential rivals by persuading them to fix a stick to the bottom of their cameras.

It's just a habit and with a fast Manfrotto and a very good ballhead, I find it easier than to shoot handheld, especially for the framing of the model's gestures and the exact position under the feet and above the head with full-bodies. You can easily follow swaying in the lateral field with a monopod, and with handheld, you can have cut-off feet or too much space on top. I like to have my full 21MP usable and not sell extra white space to the buyer.

The first lesson models get is not to sway back and forth, and that goes for handheld too. They can expand gestures sideways, but never movements of the eyes in the front to back plane.

It all boils down on how you direct your models, especially for dynamic shots and expressions. I found out-of-balance poses to be good sellers but you have to be very fast to catch them or the model gets easily tired after a few takes. This is an example of last weekend's shoot and it was right after the first take.

460
The problem are sync speeds. They only go up to 250th or 200th. Even then you can sometimes see the shutter. I usually stay at 1/160th with my 5d II.
Correct. Even at 1/160, you can see a slight curtain effect, easily solved by a PS gradient. I would never go higher with the 5DII.
Flash might be only a few microseconds but the few studios I saw have "false" daylight. Your highlights might still have slight motion blur. A tripod is very awkward in studio but a monopod is as good. I have the carbon fiber Manfrotto which is very light to travel with. Press it firmly against your eye to exploit the inertia of your head in avoiding the click vibration.

461
Is Feature Pics doing a re-audit of its files???
If so...that's real nice of them not to communicat it to everyone!!!  >:(  >:(
Elena had a vacation till end September/begin October so perhaps the site ran on autopilot.
They announced long ago they would hunt for duplicates. Perhaps yours were dupes?
On a lighter note, the past month sales went up there after an appalling 2009.
Mostly 0.50$ subs.

462
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia with editorial?
« on: October 04, 2010, 09:08 »
What exactly do the British know about proper beer?  ??? ???
Neither do the Dutch or the Germans. Their "beer" is like making love in a canoe, fckin close to water. Every beer connoisseur knows that Belgian Beer is the best.  :P

463
General Photography Discussion / Re: 500G free online space
« on: October 04, 2010, 09:03 »
Here's my referral link
Apart from spamming your referral link on a site that pops up a mega unclosable Online Gambling link, are you planning to entertain us about photography, or did you just dump your egg before disappearing in oblivion? Aaargh. Behead the spammers ::)

464
Photo Critique / Re: Critique some photos please!
« on: September 26, 2010, 21:48 »
This post was from July 1. The guy is already gone a long time ago. This was his last post.

465
General Stock Discussion / Re: My first $1000
« on: September 26, 2010, 21:31 »
I thought for a moment I was on the Dreamstime forum.  ;D
yes it does eheh but actually these kind of milestones are important to keep the motivation UP
I'm more worried about my last 1000$.  ;)

466
Cameras / Lenses / Re: Monopod
« on: September 26, 2010, 21:04 »
Any suggestions?
I can't miss a monopod! Since I travel a lot ( those extra overweight charges on planes) I can't miss my carbon fiber Manfrotto pod. It's very light and strong. The ballhead is from Giotto Manfrotto too and the problem is that's is as heavy as the pod. I wouldn't save any money on a good mono or tripod.

467
General Stock Discussion / Re: My first $1000
« on: September 26, 2010, 20:59 »
I thought for a moment I was on the Dreamstime forum.  ;D

468
Newbie Discussion / Re: Shutterstock for Newbies
« on: September 22, 2010, 18:12 »
What are you doing Monday Night? I'll be watching the Packers take down the Bears.  ;)
Oh well, I'm not into blue movies any more. Then I don't have a TV. And more important, I have tickets for the Liechtensteiner Chamber Orchestra that night, playing works of Johann Adolf Schicklgruber on a freshly tuned water harmonica with the Choir of Kant's Kritik der Reinen Vernunft and Ratzinger's delight la faon de Schopenhauer. I could spam around my ticket referral links but I guess I can make more at the entry of the Concert Hall. I'll try to blog some good Editorial on Twitter from there. ::)

469
Newbie Discussion / Re: OK...not really new...but trying again :)
« on: September 22, 2010, 17:47 »
I agree with FD....those portraits are beautiful!!
I added her as fav on Dreamstime. Hopefully she will be back. Portraiture is still the max, imho. I started doing it when I was 14 and my mom was my main subject. I had a lot of encouragement from her when she slapped me in the face since I over-emphasized her eye-bags it seems.  ;D
Since then I took the advice of a famous French portraiture painter: picture the women 20 kgs slimmer and 20 years younger and their jewelry 20x fatter.  :P

470
The photographers are behind the sleeze factor not the models.
The "photographers" without film in their camera do exist. I had to remove "model photography" from my business card because I grew tired of the cheesy grins I got when they read it.

471
Adobe Stock / Re: Terrible review acceptance at FT
« on: September 22, 2010, 10:04 »
Take FD's advice, JP.
I sent him the real advice yesterday by a PM. I couldn't tell it in public since I got it from deep inside FT.   ;)
Basically, the comment of Miklav was on-spot.

472
Adobe Stock / Re: Terrible review acceptance at FT
« on: September 22, 2010, 09:46 »
Thats good!  I like when an Agency just dont take any old thing as long as its technically sound. This way, it will stop irrelevant material clogging up files and in the long run it will benefit both buyers and contributors.
Would it be correct to assume that the "old irrelevant stuff" that "clogs" the searches are other people's photos, while yours are the relevant ones?  :P
What a newbie answer??
Yes sorry, I'm a newbie and what's more, a bad one.
especially the ones that are NOT needed
I thought that the buyers decided "what's needed", but apparently I was wrong. Sorry.
Would it be correct to assume you have a bad acceptance rate at FT?
Yes, it's terrible. Sorry.

473
123RF / Re: Stats data not showing
« on: September 22, 2010, 07:53 »
Do others have this problem and does anybody know of a cure for it?
Yap. I have that problem (all zeros) since May (or earlier) and they just don't address it. The only way to know what I sold is go to "downloads" but it doesn't display a sum. I stopped asking.

474
Image Sleuth / Re: Images on Zazzle
« on: September 22, 2010, 07:46 »
According to rules for posting, I shouldn't name names.
Where? Here? You can put up a link to one of the offending products.

475
Adobe Stock / Re: Terrible review acceptance at FT
« on: September 22, 2010, 07:40 »
Thats good!  I like when an Agency just dont take any old thing as long as its technically sound. This way, it will stop irrelevant material clogging up files and in the long run it will benefit both buyers and contributors.
Would it be correct to assume that the "old irrelevant stuff" that "clogs" the searches are other people's photos, while yours are the relevant ones?  :P

Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23 24 ... 82

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors