MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - cobalt
4526
« on: March 19, 2013, 18:22 »
I am sorry, but yes, they must have had a huge influx of exclusives like me. In a few months our files will be online and hopefully they can take new contributors again. It is a lovely site. I hope they also get growing sales.
4527
« on: March 19, 2013, 16:00 »
Was it an editorial file? They seem to be lightning fast with them.
4528
« on: March 19, 2013, 04:11 »
I am also surprised by those numbers. I was on 35% and got around 7 dollars on average. Only for vetta files was I seeing an average of maybe 12 - 16 dollars. And my average for vetta was higher than my average for gettyimages. They only pay 20% and have so many 1 dollar downloads that the average is brought down significantly. I have been a Getty house contributor since 2008.
For most of the people I know the average for Vetta or agency files was always higher than on getty, whch is why so many good artists stopped supplying getty directly and only upload via istock/vetta, agency or E+.
Just look at the size of the portfolios of the istock brass on getty and istock and you will usually see they hardly upload directly to getty.
But good for you if these are your numbers. You should obviuosly focus all your energy on getty itself.
But this is the first time ever, I hear numbers like this.
Are you perhaps doing a lot of high end video?
ETA: just saw you said "in January". Ok, then you probably had a good month with a few higher downloads and not so many 1 dollar downloads. But if you look at your average over the 12 months and especially the trend over the last two years, is your average going up or down?
If the average royalty on Getty was 43 dollars everybody would be fighting to get in there! And you would never hear the macro shooters whine and complain on all the stock forums of the internet.
4529
« on: March 18, 2013, 14:27 »
I cannot imagine anyone quit exclusivity in the last 12 months for stocksy. I certainly didn't, I didn't even know about it until leaf broke the news.
The place isn't open for buiness yet and has no customers.
I went independent because all the drama and bad management decisions of the last 2 years and especially the last 6 months. And then the Microsoft deal and the getty/google deal.
The traffic for istock is falling continuosly, it never goes back up. Istock must be losing customers on a massive scale. Everyone I knew who used to buy from istock has turned away over all the IT issues and the extremly high prices. Nobody ever goes back to istock.
And here in Germany many photographers supply Fotolia with exclusive content and do extremly well there. The best known blogger is averaging over 10k a month while being independent. And he stopped supplying istock in 2010.
His earnings and those of many others are growing well.
I think maybe 2 years ago, or 18 months ago probably as an exclusive you would have made more. But I believe with the continuing drop in downloads and focus on Thinkstock and Getty, the exclusives cannot win.
istock is just a brand fighting a losing battle for attention between all the other Getty brands. They have fired a lot of high quality staff, they have closed the office in Berlin and even the German forum no longer has a dedicated moderator and community builder.
If they don't even have money for that, than for me as a European contributor it means I have to pay attention to the agencies that are investing and building their presence in Europe.
I know it will take time to build up my portfolio on other sites. But in the end I simply have to go where the customers are going.
I have waited a long, long time to see if they will reverse the trend, but I don't see the slightest indication that the customers are coming back.
4530
« on: March 18, 2013, 11:42 »
@warrenprice
The only solution for that is to wait until the previous batch is approved. Maybe switch to uploading all files once every two weeks if that helps.
I am too new to see what time frame would be best. But in the end as long as sou have regular monthly uploads you should be ok. I just kow people who went indie and then brought all their files online within the first 6 weeks and then wondered a few months later hy their files are no longer showing up in searches.
4531
« on: March 18, 2013, 09:51 »
AHA!!! Nearly 50% after 9 months and you still have thousands of files to upload. Very encouraging!!!
Could you post this table on your facebookpage (for the public) then I would repost it on my own page for cobalt stock.
This is very good news, indeed.
4532
« on: March 18, 2013, 08:59 »
Thank you for the new table Lucato. So after 9 months your indie earnings are 21% But what about your indie istock earnings? Are they included in the 21%? Or would that be another column for your table  ? Maybe then your total earnings are higher? Everyone else, thank you for your input. I think this discussion will help everyone who is considering to go independent.
4533
« on: March 18, 2013, 06:00 »
Hi Lucato,
if you write to depositphotos that you have many files but have little time they will help you upload and edit your files to get them online faster. They just made me that offer last, I am sure they would offer the same to you.
I wrote back that for now I want to try doing it myself, but because deposit is a smaller site, perhaps I will take them up on that offer.
@aeonf
I have seen many exclusives go indie "dump" their portfolios quickly on the other site, often with the help from the agencies themselves and then be very dissapointed with the results. And since they have great content my theory is that they just sent them up too fast and best match seasonalities worked against them.
But if you put your files online fast and then share your results we can all see what strategy works best longterm.
It also all depends on how many new files you can generate. I can only do 50-100 a month, so I wanted to add the older files for regular uploads.
4534
« on: March 18, 2013, 03:24 »
Hi Lucato,
do you think you could give us a table comparing your current earnings with your previous exclusive earnings?
If you take an average exckusive income and set that as 100% and then add a second column with your total indie earnings. And then show us how did it all develop over time.
I think you are currently at 40% of your previous exclusive income. Is that correct?
4535
« on: March 18, 2013, 02:58 »
Why so long? Because your files need to move into customer lightboxes and your images need to rise in the search engines. There is lots of superb indepedent content, the customers have not been waiting for you.
It is the same way like opening any other webshop, or a store on amazon and ebay, even if all your products are available for sale immediatly, you will not earn as much as in 2 years when you have a loyal following of repeat customers.
The other thing is best match. If you upload all files one month then all your files have the same "time stamp". If files from that particular month are out of favor, you're 5000 files will all rise and drop together in the time factor of a best match.
Anyway, good luck with your system. If you can of course then continue to keep adding high volumes of new content every month, maybe it will work.
Please let us know your results.
4536
« on: March 17, 2013, 19:04 »
I am expecting it to take two years to get back to a level I feel comfortable with.
This is simply becuase by uploading to a new agency, you are entering a new marketplace. The customers need to get to know you as a reliable resource, they have to bookmark you, lightbox your files, "follow you" etc...Then the client has to approve the project and my files and then comes th download...and then a few months later the project gets extended and they download even more files etc...
The only variable is video. That is a new market and there is very little good content. And video files earn a lot more. So, if I learn how to make good videos, I might be able to speed up my income. But 18 months should be a minimum time frame. unless I become superhuman and can upload 500 files a month. But that is simply not possible unless I hire people. And at this time I dont want to.
4537
« on: March 17, 2013, 18:50 »
The financial drop on istock comes from the much lower prices for indie files and the lower percentage. Basically you will immediatly earn 75% less, even if you have the same number of downloads.
My understanding of Lucatos table is that in February the earnings from all the other sites combined was around 80% of his istock earnings. But since these are just 25% of what he used to earn, he now gets around 40-50% of what he used to earn from istock when he was exclusive.
However, he still hasnt uploaded all his 7000 files. And i dont know how much new content he uploaded along the older files.
Actually if in 9 months I can get 50% of my last istock earnings with just a fraction of my portfolio I would consider it a great success.
4538
« on: March 17, 2013, 18:38 »
Well gostwyck already answered my question. I meant exclusive images. You just take a series and upload it only to fotolia or dreams time.
Thank you for the input!
4539
« on: March 17, 2013, 18:21 »
That is very, very useful information, thank you very much!!
This is my first week of independence, well first few days, actually. So I am trying to get to know the agencies in general and I want to make sure I get something like 300-500 interesting images up on all sites in the next 4-6 weeks.
Then I will continue to upload a mix of video, new shootings and old files and I will, like Lisa suggested, give more importance to the sites that actually sell.
According to your table that should be Shutterstock.
But the one thing you havent tried to raise the visibility of your portfolio, if I understand correctly, is to give exclusive series or files to the different agencies.
Again, thank you. I will share when I have some new info, but it will be a few months before I have enough data about the overall market.
4540
« on: March 17, 2013, 17:36 »
I have another question - do you guys make use of the option to upload exclusive images? My super secret plan involves making dedicated exclusive shootings for the different agencies to increase overall visibility of the whole portfolio. However I need to get a feeling for the agencies first to see what they sell best and also what style they sell best.
So if an agency is good at shooting lifestyle they get exclusive lifestyle, if somebody is good at selling my amateur food images, they get more food, if they sell backgrounds...etc...
I think this would work particularly well for regional content. If you know an agency is US centric I would try to make the models smile more, if I shoot for the German or European market, I could include local settings etc...
Longterm I would try to give an agency that takes exclusive images around 30% exclusive content.
If istock had the option of accepting exclusive files I would definetly send them good material.
Or do you think this is a bad idea and that I should just always send everything everywhere?
4541
« on: March 17, 2013, 12:07 »
Hi Lucato, thank you very much! I am a little shocked that Dreamstime is performing so poorly. From the site itself and the web traffic I would have thought they are a good agency. And what has your experience been with fotolia? If jsnover was able to recover 85 % of her 2010 earnings than she is already making more than many exclusives, who stayed exclusive and keep uploading. I will try to get 600 files up in the next 2 months and then I will focus on mixing new and old while I shoot and upload. Let's keep reporting our results, because many people are watching us
4542
« on: March 17, 2013, 05:13 »
Hi Lucato, Im now one of the indies. You can follow my progress here: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Cobaltstockcom/169793413171571I want to upload my files slowly and mix new images from fresh shootings with older files. I believe the main problem is that people underestimate how long it takes to attract repeat customers. I also want to do more video. How are you doing? Any recommendations...?
4543
« on: March 15, 2013, 13:09 »
I agree, this sounds like the images are all basically free by amateurs who just want to see their name printed. It doesnt say anyhwere that these are commercial stock images and that you MUST buy a proper license if you want to use the files outside of a google drive document.
Google and Getty cannot solve this by adding a few words nobody will read.
Getty is selling our files to 425 million for 12 dollars. That is completly unacceptable.
They are basically turning them over for free to one fifth of the internet population.
Together with the strange "pay per view" deal it looks like Getty is moving away from actually selling files. Maybe they feel it is too much hard work to compete with all the other agencies. But of course they can "rent" the content or make supersize deals that give them millions and leave less than the illusion of peanuts for the individual artists.
4544
« on: March 15, 2013, 08:00 »
I just applied at stock fresh. So I hope you grow and are successful  I forgot to add that I have a round 3400 files. Does anyone know how long it takes to get accepted?
4545
« on: March 13, 2013, 02:53 »
I just downloaded it and will be testing it with video later today. Will share here how it went.
4546
« on: March 12, 2013, 18:20 »
If their admins were active in all commercial social media boards including their own forums, msg and designer resources they would have a much better pulse on the market.
Instead of just getting involved they choose the most indirect methods available. They must have a lot of money to waste for information the internet communities/blogs all provide for free.
4547
« on: March 11, 2013, 14:32 »
@ticketstock
the other sites are not cozying up to Google and handing over files for 12 dollars to 425 million people.
The Getty/Google deal changed things quite dramatically and not just for me. I know the other stock agencies are no angels, but here in Germany Fotolia is the biggest and best known site by far and I know a lot of people who sell really well there. Since I live here, I can shoot local content and Fotolia allows me to keyword in German, I hope to take advantage of that. Shutterstock also seems to be interested in expanding their presence here and Pond5 just bought a European agency. On the other hand the istock office in Berlin was closed...so as a European contributor...which agencies should I be interested in? The ones that invest in Germany/Europe, or the ones that move away?
And all the other agencies are TALKING to me. I have now been trying for over a month to communicate directly with gettyimages about my house contract and I simply cannot get a reply even to easy questions. And what Getty does, soon will be done on istock. They have already killed the telephone support and many contributors report being stuck in an endless loop between forums and the ticket system. Again, I know this can happen on other sites as well, but if you are exclusive, communication problems are just beyond frustrating.
I had no intention of going independent when the year started, I could have easily been happy between video independence and photo exclusivity.
But with all that happened...I might as well be independent and have more control over my work. All the drama on istock is so distracting, I really want to focus on production.
@Sue just a silly marketing thing about how the bad best match match was like a bad experience with an online dating site and then they sent out a bonus code...forget it, it was silly. But we have seen things like these several times.
Anyway, thanks for the kind wishes, also on my website. It will be a long journey, but so many people are going independent, I wont be climbing up that mountain alone.
4548
« on: March 11, 2013, 13:57 »
The usual - Shutterstock, Fotolia, dreamstime, pond5 and maybe later some of the smaller ones. I am also on clipdealer and clipcanvas with my videos, so Ill probably upload photos there as well (if they take photos). I am not in a hurry. I know it will take two years to recover my income and my main focus for the year will be video, the way I planned it at the beginning of the year. I would also like to try selling from my own site, but that is probably a project for 2014. You can follow my journey to independence on my facebook page, if you are interested: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Cobaltstockcom/169793413171571
4549
« on: March 11, 2013, 13:48 »
This is good for Sean, at least he gets some room to breathe. Since they seem to have no problem closing other accounts (Ivar) I would take this as an indication that after the adrenaline power kick they are waking up to the mess they created. Although I really dont see how they can go back and recover but maybe if they talk to Sean they could find another solution that makes more sense from a business perspective.
Anyway, my exclusivity is ending in 2 days and I look forward to some peace of mind. I am already enjoying my work a lot more than before. All the drama of istock was so demoralising and frustrating. And just today I read their latest marketing gaffe about "online dating with istockphoto". The place must be run by teenagers or people who deep down really hate the company and just love to embarrass istock internationally. They would never do anything like this to gettyimages. They know instinctively that to embarrass Getty means they lose their jobs.
So glad I can move on and work with companies that are maybe a lot smaller but genuinely trying to build a longterm business. It will be more work but I already feel safer knowing I will never again be dependent on one companies managers (that I have no influence in choosing).
4550
« on: March 08, 2013, 18:27 »
I've personally learned a lot thanks to this forum and I recommend it to every CEO to get here and try to swim in these wild waters. My English improved a lot by reading posts here over and over. Even the negative ones are good to see. They make the discussion a bit more real as "positive only" discussions seem a bit unbelievable. That's the crazy virtual world we live in.
I love msg. It is the perfect place to understand how social media and forum communication works. I believe anybody working on a site that sells on the internet should learn how to operate and communicate well on a site like this. And msg is a very friendly place, compared to all the other business forums I go to. Companies where employees only work on their internal forums sometimes have no idea what the real world is like. Many come across as completly detached from the industry because they have isolated themselves in their own little "protected" bubble. Companies whose CEOs know how to communicate here, i have a lot of confidence that you guys understand how to do business on the internet. And that you also really care about your business. So let us see what you can do together!
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|