|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - luissantos84
4576
« on: February 20, 2012, 08:14 »
All Time (since July 2009) 1/695
4577
« on: February 19, 2012, 08:59 »
seriously guys hear the pros here 
4578
« on: February 19, 2012, 08:39 »
email them, sure they will answer, very cool app
4579
« on: February 19, 2012, 08:35 »
last night had one for 4.95$ (yes a sub)
4580
« on: February 18, 2012, 19:49 »
the coolest thing is that many contributors think that we are the ones to blame!  when we know there is only one thing here, which I wont repeat again..
4581
« on: February 18, 2012, 12:54 »
I don't think you can sell shots of a dog that belongs to someone without having a release from the owner.
that would be so absurd..
4582
« on: February 18, 2012, 07:55 »
10 for 0.25$
1 for 0.31$
4583
« on: February 17, 2012, 22:37 »
We all should respect every individual's right to make decisions in his or her best interest. If I were in the shoes of someone upset at the new terms, I would want to leave. And if you were in my shoes, retaining your rate or even seeing a possible increase, you would want to stay.
sounds to me like, I will score more money $$$
4584
« on: February 17, 2012, 22:33 »
not even top contributors have their respect, thats so cool (sarcastic of course)
Of course they don't. Look at the spat that took place between Yuri and Serban for too similar rejections on Yuri's submissions. From what I read in that thread, Serban prevailed. If that is actually hard evidence, it's not worth complaining about DT rejections because us "little people" won't win. 
right, no point in complaining a rejection (actually it "may" screw you), on the other hand never had a rejection from a resubmission at IS
4585
« on: February 17, 2012, 20:38 »
I make a few hundred bucks per month at an agency that isn't even on that list at right (no, I'm not telling anyone which agency, don't ask)
come on vectors?
4586
« on: February 17, 2012, 20:26 »
finally they told us why RCs were implemented 
4587
« on: February 17, 2012, 20:15 »
There's two types of readers here: Those that do it for business and those that do it for fun.
No disrespect but as I told you in your thread about 123RF I make my own decisions on whether I upload or stick with an agency and everyone else that does this as a business will most probably do exactly the same.
Some people here do it for fun and are happy to get $10 a year from an agency.
If you're looking to start a revolution I think you're wasting your breath.
of course we all make our decisions from the shooting to the upload, not a question there.. but no matter how big you are you need to be concerned about agencies moves, sure you can be doing insanely good in all agencies for years and years but you dont know what will happen tomorrow (IS drop and FT emerals per example) the "union" is a very hard idea as we all know and for sure will never happen but it would be nice to have some respect from agencies 
4588
« on: February 17, 2012, 19:18 »
4589
« on: February 17, 2012, 18:19 »
And I took a look at my percentage of subs sales of the monthly totals since last June (when I returned to independence) and it was 41% by units (downloads) and 18% by $$, so I would say it's pretty similar to SS in that a lot of the money is coming from non-sub sales
123RF - 49% (downloads) and 22% $$ (subs) SS - 31% $$ (not subs)
4590
« on: February 17, 2012, 18:03 »
When you don't understand a rejection, send a polite email to support asking about that specific rejection. On the few occasions that I've tried this, I have been extremely impressed with the responses I've gotten. A lot can be learned about what is being looked for this way.
seriously? DONT
4591
« on: February 17, 2012, 17:22 »
not even top contributors have their respect, thats so cool (sarcastic of course)
4592
« on: February 17, 2012, 16:16 »
Another point that drives me insane is the fact that they think a sub - no matter what size is only worth 1 royalty credit. A XXL sub dl should be 5 credits unless they only dl an XS.
we can add FT on that one too which actually gives us 1/4 
4593
« on: February 17, 2012, 14:54 »
from 76 sales this month 4 are XL (1.13, 1.26, 1.8, 4)
4 credits seem a bit low I agree..
4594
« on: February 17, 2012, 11:30 »
will we have RCs revised too?
4595
« on: February 17, 2012, 11:28 »
100 is the max?
4596
« on: February 17, 2012, 10:51 »
Rodeo.fi
never heard of it, will take a look, thanks
4597
« on: February 17, 2012, 09:38 »
Perhaps you are right, but I did this copy and paste from the Alamy site a few minutes ago.
I shoot on D90, camera raw, photoshop and save JPG (12) and sRGB.. then upload to all agencies, nothing different to Alamy
4598
« on: February 17, 2012, 09:18 »
Alamy acceptes images that are 8 megapixel. The "megabyte" refers to an uncompressed image (TIFF file). I submit at minimum 8.2 megapixel.
exactly.. thats the only request.. I believe it is 8.4MP.. basically I upload and they "reject" lower sizes..
4599
« on: February 17, 2012, 08:20 »
^^No, not the top 10. Was in the top 50, till sales declined. Now overall rank is dropping, as 7 day rank has blown out. I don't think I'm the only Emerald to experience this.
sure, have heard other here I guess
4600
« on: February 16, 2012, 21:32 »
wow.. looks like IS exclusives are running the poll
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
