MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - stockmarketer
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 ... 35
476
« on: April 10, 2012, 06:51 »
First, welcome and best of luck!
Second, you are a skilled illustrator, but you will find a great deal of competition in this style. Find an approach that is more stylish or unique to make you stand out. If not, you will find it challenging to attract many sales.
Third, a greater attention to the small but important details would help. The superhero's mask makes him look like a Mexican wrestler. The two athletes look angry... if they looked happier, it would better symbolize success and victory. And the football player looks like he's holding a sandwich instead of a ball. These minor points might push away someone who might otherwise buy these.
I hope this is helpful... not trying to discourage you... good luck!
477
« on: April 09, 2012, 10:33 »
It's a funny picture, but ultimately nothing will change, unless a more effective reaction than victim mentality is embraced.
The union spokeswoman says "Each day, photographers are faced with decreasing rates. They are forced to compete against image libraries that are offering vile prices. These practices are infringing on photographers' moral rights."
Forced? Are photographers slaves? Don't want to compete against people doing similar work for a lower price? Is the government or union supposed to protect you from competition? Do something better than your competitors do, or get used to charging a competitive price.
Moral rights? Sorry, if people want to be paid for working -- whatever it is they do -- that's business. If you produce something that is in high demand and low supply, you can command a high price. Produce something in low demand and/or high supply, and you will make next to nothing. Am I violating your moral rights if I pay you the value calculated by the supply/demand of the marketplace? Silliness.
478
« on: April 09, 2012, 07:08 »
I don't know about that. My impression from watching the sales is that Americans, while always maintaining that they never stop working, have trouble sticking together five days in a row without discovering some "national holiday" and then supplement that with a good ole break in the summer.
I think you missed the first line in that wikipedia article about the U.S. holidays... "The United States does not have national holidays in the sense of days on which all employees in the U.S. receive mandatory a day free from work and all business is halted by law." The list of holidays you see on the page are in fact not the list of days that most workers take off. Here's an interesting comparison of days off by country: http://www.businessinsider.com/countries-take-most-vacation-2011-7"Despite unprecedented prosperity, Americans work longer and take fewer vacations than almost any developed country. Indeed, we're the only country that doesn't mandate paid vacations for full-time employees. Only Canadians and Chinese work more days." And as for personal vacation days that we are entitled to, I can tell you that at every place I've ever worked, this is very true: http://money.cnn.com/2011/11/30/pf/unused_vacation/index.htmWe may earn 3 or 4 weeks off, but once you become middle management or higher, it's essentially frowned upon if you try to actually take all those days off... supposedly it looks like you're not dedicated to the company.
479
« on: April 08, 2012, 21:52 »
I was thinking about that... Not sure what % of the overall stock market is US customers versus the rest of the world. anyone know? There are many countries that haven't shut down for the long weekend.
My impression has always been that the U.S. is less likely to take long breaks. When it comes to holidays, vacations, summers, etc., the U.S. is famous for working itself crazy and not taking much time off. Now, Europe, that's another story... or countries like India, where I've heard there are days off work declared for everything under the sun.
480
« on: April 08, 2012, 06:30 »
You are competing with yourself based on price. You aren't making more from other sites, because you are just diverting the same sales and stealing your own downloads.
No, as a general rule and based on today's realities of the ms marketplace, this is untrue. I am certain I would be earning far less if I just had ports at the top two or three sites. If I limited my reach like this, I'd miss the buyers who -- for whatever reason -- choose only to buy from 123, DP, GL, or wherever. Your theory is like saying that if I sell widgets and get my product into Walmart, then I should NOT attempt to sell through Target, Kmart, Walgreens, etc. because I'd only be stealing sales from myself. As a merchandising practice, this would be pretty backwards thinking.
481
« on: April 07, 2012, 04:52 »
I expect $.12 per day from each image. When I started several years ago, I was seeing more like $.09 per day per image, and that has increased gradually to $.12/day as I added more agencies to the mix and became better at figuring what buyers want and sharpened my skills.
Many of my pics from the beginning still sell well, and I believe they'll outlive this arbitrary "5 year shelf life" number that people are throwing around. But if I use that 5-year number for the sake of argument, that comes out to .12/day x 365 days/year x 5 years = $219/image.
482
« on: April 06, 2012, 06:24 »
Well, I'm offended! I have 0. You're all dirtbags! (There, did that move the needle?)
483
« on: April 06, 2012, 06:22 »
I noticed the site being down for a while yesterday, and figured my sales would end up being lousy for the day because of it. But when the search came back with the default to best sellers it must have helped me... turned out to be a typically good weekday for me, with sales in line with the rest of the week.
484
« on: April 06, 2012, 06:18 »
Yes, I woke up to see about half the sales I saw yesterday morning. Fridays are typically the worst weekday, but yikes.
Of course, today is Good Friday. It is to be expected. I now expect the rest of the month to end up being a huge drop from March. Easter vacations and Spring Break make this one of the worst months of the year. Sales-wise, I dread it more than any other. Historically (for me, anyway) May will climb back a little, but then June, July and August will be flat or decreasing a bit each month. September always comes roaring back, and then Oct and Nov are pretty great right through the beginning of December, then we all know what happens after Dec 15 or so.
485
« on: April 05, 2012, 05:20 »
Anyone else notice .38 commissions starting to show up in the Single and Other Downloads column? Had a few today... I think that's a first for me. I've been getting a nice amount of the 5.70 sales lately, so I was surprised to see some .38 sales show up in that column. Are there some pricing shifts going on?
486
« on: April 04, 2012, 06:47 »
Same here... a few sales right out of the gate and nothing since then. I have two theories:
1. when we upload, since there are very few people uploading, our pics make it to the front page, so they get a lot of views (well, a lot for AllYouCanStock.com, anyway). That gives us our best shot at some sales. Then we fall off the front page and no one sees our stuff.
2. Didn't the site owner admit that he himself is buying some pics for promotional or other use? Could it be that he's buying some stuff from each of us to get us excited so we spread the good word and keep uploading? There's no downside for him until he has to make payouts (we have to reach $25). If things really pick up and we get over $25 with sales from real customers, he can afford to pay us at that point. Until then, no one gets paid and he's not out any money.
487
« on: April 02, 2012, 13:05 »
just checked the forum stats and in 6 months MSG went from 10k users to 28k
a lot of people reading but not sharing or participating (not to mention the ones not even registered), this is just a curious fact that shows how stock is far from dead
MS is indeed far from dead. In fact, I expect the money spent on ms images to grow steadily for several years. But it will be harder and harder every day for a new contributor to achieve any success. It's been pointed out many times here that the pie may be growing, but your own slice of it could be getting smaller and smaller, because there's so many more people like you grabbing for a piece. Some advice to people just starting now: - This is hard work. Your technical skills have to be near perfect to get accepted these days at the agencies that matter. But that's just getting your foot in the door. That doesn't mean you'll actually get sales. - You need to have a unique vision. A copycat can no longer just borrow ideas from top selling images and expect to do well. If it doesn't get you called out and banned, it still won't help you sell, since the established pics almost always keep selling well, while a glut of copycat images sit around the bottom of searches. - With rare exceptions, a huge portfolio is necessary to drive decent sales. - A good business sense may be more important than artistic skills. Yes, you need the creative know-how to make your pictures, but you need to study the market and figure out what buyers actually want and how you can serve those needs better than anyone else. A marketing 101 class would be time well spent, perhaps even better than a photography or illustration course. I'm not out to discourage anyone, just painting an honest picture about the world of microstock today. If you're talented, with unique vision, hard-working, willing to put in the months and years to build a large port, and with good marketing sense to know where to be focusing your efforts, you can do well. But every day the odds are stacked more and more against you. Still, best of luck... I'd like to see more creative people (not copycats) entering microstock... it builds credibility and customer satisfaction for the market, which in the big picture, helps us all.
488
« on: April 02, 2012, 12:50 »
This is something I've thought about a good deal. For a long time, I found that the pics I spent the most time planning, executing and processing to get just perfect are the ones that don't get downloaded much. I've actually learned from this... if I want to please myself, that's fine, but it won't make me much money. I should be prepared to just be satisfied with thinking I did a good job. But if the goal is to make money, I have to first consider what will actually sell. Often that means simpler, uncluttered with detail, and must include an obvious concept or message that slaps you across the face. Pics that adhere to this formula are always my best sellers, but I'm least proud of them artistically.
The challenge for me lately has been sticking by those rules in a way that I also find creatively pleasing. I've had a few pics recently that met both goals... this is constantly a learning process.
489
« on: April 02, 2012, 12:42 »
For me, subs are typically just around one third of my total.
That breakdown has not fluctuated over the past few months or years.
Today, in fact, subs are just one quarter, and I even have an EL today. Could be a BDE. I guess 123RF buyers haven't heard that it's April and they're supposed to slow down their buying. Sshhh! Don't tell them!
490
« on: April 02, 2012, 12:37 »
BME.
Mar 2012 was up 8.0% over Feb 2012.
Mar 2012 was up 45.1% over Mar 2011.
Fifth year as independent.
491
« on: March 31, 2012, 06:37 »
Normally I dread the March to April drop, but the significant rise this past week suggest the falloff might not be as extreme as normal.
Why is that, I mean the April drop? Easter, spring break etc? I'm not long enough in this game to have my own pattern of April sales, but last year April was strong
Was wondering the same about April/Easter. Will the Holiday business closures affect sales or does Easter offer a jump in sales?
Every single year I've been at this, I've seen a significant drop from March to April. It's due to March traditionally being my month that rises the most, and April being pretty awful due to Easter and spring break. I suppose if your port is disproportionately loaded with Easter and spring-related pics you might avoid a drop, but even then most buyers would have made such purchases in the weeks leading up to April, making your drop even worse.
492
« on: March 29, 2012, 09:19 »
For me, March is doing the opposite of what I expected. It started out weaker than normal, and is closing out extremely strong. Will be another BME by a comfortable margin. Not many ELs at the beginning of the month, but then 12 in the last ten days. SS isn't the only site on the upswing... I'd say it's across the board. Even DT has given me a few ELs this week. This is giving me a more encouraging outlook on April. Normally I dread the March to April drop, but the significant rise this past week suggest the falloff might not be as extreme as normal.
493
« on: March 24, 2012, 16:32 »
No, for a few reasons.
1. The analogy you describe is one of commodity. It probably is apt for a large amount of copycat submissions to ms these days, but I consider my stuff different. My style hasn't been duplicated, and my subject matter is niche yet in high demand, so I do pretty well on all the sites, big and small. I wouldn't cut my flow of pics to any of the sites, because even at the commission levels you suggest, I would lose out.
2. It's never wise to put all your eggs in one -- or even a select few -- baskets.
494
« on: March 23, 2012, 07:12 »
I lost my hope in SF, at this moment I'm 20 in popularity artist list of the site. What's make me scary? My earning of this month are less than 9 dollars...
That's weird. I'm much lower on the list but am earning something like $30-$50 every month there. I actually have much more hope for them. They seem to be heading in the right direction, though slowly.
495
« on: March 22, 2012, 19:29 »
I didn't get the survey invite either.
I'm guessing they pulled a random sample of contributors. If there are multiple write-in boxes, that's a lot of information to go through manually, and they may not have wanted tens of thousands of responses at once.
Speaking of which... what is the current number of Fotolia contributors, anyone know? Of course, only a portion of those would be active.
496
« on: March 22, 2012, 09:08 »
Is it just me, or do those big sales only show up in our totals overnight, as if all the partner site totals get added to the main tally at around 7 or 8 am in Europe?
I'm now conditioned to make CanStockPhoto the first site I check when I wake up to see how many of those big sales happened. Seeing another $20 or $40 pop up sure is a nice way to start the day.
497
« on: March 22, 2012, 08:53 »
Anyone else see a sudden drop Wed night / Thurs morning in their FT downloads?
I'm thinking a best match shift happened around midnight in Europe.
For me, yesterday (Wednesday) was a great day for downloads, normal for a weekday lately.
Then at around midnight in Europe, it's like a switch was flipped. I'm looking at around 25% of the downloads I would normally see at this time of the day.
Maybe this hit certain types of contributors more than others. If you're an Emerald, and/or in the top few hundred in the FT rankings, did you see a drastic change overnight?
498
« on: March 20, 2012, 06:43 »
I used to see great sales on GL, with aggressive growth. Then they renamed themselves, redesigned the site, and most importantly, changed their whole pricing structure to be more competitive, which resulted in much lower commissions for me. I raised my pricing to compensate, but that may have just ended up pushing buyers to my lower priced competition. I had been tracking at 2x year-ago levels, then after the change, I'm well below where my earnings were last year.
I still like the site and the owners, and uploading is the easiest of all the agencies, so I'll stick with them and hope they see some growth.
499
« on: March 19, 2012, 23:47 »
I think there must be some cause to this March slowdown, but I am baffled as to what it could be. And since Easter comes in April this year, I fear that that month might also be disappointing. Maybe it's the effects of the solar storm, or the long-predicted end of microstock as we know it? 
I can't imagine either. I do know that schools around here are taking Spring Break in March (rather than around Easter, like they used to). Not sure how much effect Spring Break has on buyers, but it could account for some of it. Still doesn't fully explain it IMO, though.
I also have been experiencing a lackluster March, particularly the last week or two. Not terrible, but just a hair under Feb, and I have always considered March to be the best month of the year. I have been thinking of a number of theories: - Early spring break (agreeing with LisaFX)... the silver lining could be that April might end up being a bit better if some are taking the break now - Heat wave in much of the US (may have prompted people to take days off and enjoy the unusually nice weather) - St. Patrick's Day extended weekend (OK, so that one's a stretch.)
500
« on: March 16, 2012, 12:40 »
We need to get our heads out of the sand.
There are many, many people out there who start and end their image searches by looking at sites that offer free pictures, pure and simple.
All this talk of educating these people... really? Are you going to go door to door and try to convince them they are being bad?
How better to "educate" them on the merits of paying for better images than to set up a site offering free images and give them glimpses of how they could get much better images if they could just part with a buck or two?
This type of approach is probably the only hope for converting people who have no intention of buying. To "show them the light" you have to talk to them where they're comfortable... and building a site offering free stuff (assuming it's marketed well, has good SEO, etc.) may be the best bet for this.
I think everyone's real fear is that today's paying customer will see this and decide to download free shots instead. That is a real risk, and I would hope Dreamstime and any other microstock planning such a move has a plan to prevent cannibalization as much as possible. But the larger risk is to ignore the growing masses who would never even consider microstock. We all hate it, but the buyers of tomorrow are being trained to never pay for images. To simply try to wish the problem away will ensure microstock's demise in the long run.
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 ... 35
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|