476
Shutterstock.com / Re: New video subscription prices on Shutterstock - The dark days are here
« on: April 15, 2020, 10:48 »
The usual $20 for an HD clip now starting to feel like a huge price!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 476
Shutterstock.com / Re: New video subscription prices on Shutterstock - The dark days are here« on: April 15, 2020, 10:48 »
The usual $20 for an HD clip now starting to feel like a huge price!
477
Alamy.com / Views / Zooms huge drops in April« on: April 14, 2020, 05:25 »
Perhaps unsurprising, some big drops in views/zooms at Alamy (port = 11,700) when taking into account the 1st until 13th of Feb/March/April. Worrying.
Good indication of what's going on across the sector. 478
General Stock Discussion / Re: March 2020 Earnings Report« on: April 13, 2020, 08:36 »
Results from a coronavirus stock brainstorming:
https://brutallyhonestmicrostock.com/2020/04/13/coronavirus-stock-concepts-analysis-part-i/ 479
Canva / Re: Canva announcement« on: April 06, 2020, 12:21 »Quote Today, we are very excited to announce... Whenever any agency starts like this you know that whatever comes next is crap. 480
General Stock Discussion / Stock Agencies Reducing Prices During Coronavirus Epidemic« on: April 05, 2020, 07:26 »
Ive noticed a trend in the past few weeks where many stock agencies are offering steep discounts to buyers with a kind message that they want to help them get through the current Coronavirus / Covid-19 epidemic.
Thats sweet of them, but I wouldnt be surprised if these discounts will come at the expense of contributor earnings (will see in the next months earnings reports). The question I ask myself is: arent contributors also running a self-employed business that may also be struggling / will struggle? https://brutallyhonestmicrostock.com/2020/04/05/stock-agencies-reducing-prices-during-coronavirus-epidemic/ Alex 481
General Stock Discussion / Re: Dreamstime monthly contest removed.« on: April 04, 2020, 16:27 »What was the first prize? 30, 50 $? $300 482
123RF / Re: 123rf no longer accepting video?« on: April 03, 2020, 08:40 »
if those idiots actually reviewed the stuff I sent them maybe, just maybe, they would get sold.
Latest batch has been stuck there for at least 8 months. 483
General Stock Discussion / Re: March 2020 Earnings Report« on: April 01, 2020, 08:27 »Good work getting in early on some of the coronavirus images. I definitely failed at that. Not too late to get on rioting/looting concepts ![]() 484
General Stock Discussion / Re: no point in submitting to shutterstock right now unless you want 90-100% rejects« on: April 01, 2020, 08:19 »
Shooting outside on a sunny spring day with ISO 200 and still getting noise rejection...what?
485
General Stock Discussion / March 2020 Earnings Report« on: March 31, 2020, 12:22 »
The longest month in many of our lifetimes is over and hope everybody is safe and comfortable. So sit back, get yourself a nice hot drink and get ready to digest this months Brutally Honest earnings report.
Standout results from Arcangel and Alamy. https://brutallyhonestmicrostock.com/2020/03/31/march-2020-brutally-honest-earnings-report/ Best regards, Alex 486
General Stock Discussion / Re: Coronavirus ?« on: March 12, 2020, 03:51 »
Just published a blog post:
https://brutallyhonestmicrostock.com/2020/03/12/coronavirus-covid-19-news-photos/ 487
General Stock Discussion / Re: Shutterstock vs Adobe Stock« on: March 11, 2020, 02:47 »I think we should start a petition for Adobe to start accepting editorial material. Now I think would be a great time for the that to happen. If a number of us express interest in supplying them with that type of material we might be able to get them to consider it more seriously. I'm surprised they haven't already. Editorials present relatively minimal regulatory risks to agencies vs commercial. They now accept illustrative editorial which is a good start. 488
General Stock Discussion / Re: Coronavirus ?« on: March 10, 2020, 03:12 »Same here. And the opportunity to take advantage of this situation is also pretty much gone. Try to search "Coronavirus" on SS and it brings up more than 104,000 results. All the new images will be buried deep into their huge library of images and never be found by a search. Well, I'll just put my mask back on and wait for the brighter days to arrive. My composites are selling regularly and they are quite average. Also editorials of people wearing surgical masks out and about. 489
General - Top Sites / Re: Where all those stolen portfolios on Shutterstock come from...« on: March 09, 2020, 06:02 »
We all have responsibilities...we need to take ownership for our actions, as do Unsplash idiots.
If one consumes fast-food everyday and develop health-problems, it's too easy to blame the fast-food restaurants when we have more than enough information out there to make educated decisions based on due diligence. Generally, we're living in a victim society where we constantly try to shift the blame to others. Same with Unsplash contributors, but frankly don't think the vast majority of them care because they don't know...but if they did know I'm sure they would care. Unsplash contributors aren't completely to blame, of course the agencies should have more robust processes to avoid unauthorized licensing, which shouldn't be so challenging as noted by the OP. Don't walk out at night alone in dangerous neighborhoods - simple. If one does, carry pepper-spray ![]() 490
General - Top Sites / Re: Where all those stolen portfolios on Shutterstock come from...« on: March 09, 2020, 03:57 »
To be brutally honest, whoever is an idiot enough to upload to Unsplash should be aware that there's a high risk that someone will upload their copyright for sale
491
General Stock Discussion / February 2020 Earnings Report« on: February 29, 2020, 09:28 »
Welcome back! Happy to share with you my comprehensive February 2020 report on my stock photography and footage earnings. Read on towards the end to congratulate the Turd of the Month Agency.
https://brutallyhonestmicrostock.com/2020/02/29/february-2020-brutally-honest-earnings-report/ 492
General Stock Discussion / Re: RPI month IStock exclusive vs non exclusive« on: February 28, 2020, 07:18 »
Even with "average" images, you'd certainly earn considerably more than 30cents/month/image by being non-exclusive. At least double and perhaps even triple that depending on a number of technical/commercial factors
493
General Stock Discussion / Re: This boat is sinking. So why aren't we jumping?« on: February 25, 2020, 06:08 »
Already made the transition to videos and any pics I do upload are just incidental
494
Stock Performer / Re: Slow start to the year? Or signs of a downward trend?« on: February 25, 2020, 06:03 »
Interesting.
Would be useful to cross-reference the respective contributors' uploading habits with their average Return per Download and see if there's any correlation. 495
Canva / Re: Sales not registered....« on: February 20, 2020, 03:44 »
Maybe their "sales" are on Pixabay and Pexels
496
General Stock Discussion / Re: Shutterstock--No Downloads in eight days. (And counting)« on: February 19, 2020, 15:30 »
Worried about the dropping average return per download.
497
General - Top Sites / Re: What is everyone's average dollar per download at each site?« on: February 19, 2020, 08:47 »
.
498
iStockPhoto.com / Re: istock Stats in Jan -- a bit lower« on: February 19, 2020, 02:19 »
Rollercoaster ride continues
499
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock suspicious accounts "wackamoles" update« on: February 16, 2020, 07:32 »https://www.shutterstock.com/pl/g/jered+john 10 pages of stolen stuff! 500
Shutterstock.com / Re: SSTK Stock income and earnings reporting 2019« on: February 15, 2020, 04:55 »
This forum is about stock photography but the reality is that outsourcing labour costs to where costs are lower has been common for the past 15+ years.
I remember when HSBC and dozens of other UK banks moved their operations overseas and the controversy this caused. This was 2003. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/hsbc-to-outsource-4000-uk-bank-jobs-to-asia-91762.html Back to the stock photography universe, obviously prices are dropping. No question about that. So what is one to do if they live in an "expensive part of the world". Perhaps some solutions: 1. Move to a less expensive part of the world. 2. If you shoot lifestyle, try to differentiate yourself. For instance, it may be difficult for those dozens of stock producers in eastern Europe to find models of different ethnic types, although I have to admit that I haven't researched. 3. As mentioned by Snow, shooting news / human interest editorials which cannot be replicated in a studio. Although putting them exclusively on Alamy is risky imo. 4. Shooting travel of places that aren't saturated still has a future because the cost barriers associated people from lower income countries. Although we're talking about more far-flung places, after all someone from Belgrade can travel low-cost to almost anywhere in Europe these days and stay at a hostel. 5. Shoot video: Less saturated, for now..especially the 4K variety. 6. Demote the stock stuff to pure hobby with some income instead of relying on it to make a living. Sometimes we all have to know when to move on. |
|