476
Shutterstock.com / Re: How you doing this month?
« on: February 05, 2008, 08:06 »
yes, strange, but my downloads are too much slower. one EL sale saved the day, but still ...
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 476
Shutterstock.com / Re: How you doing this month?« on: February 05, 2008, 08:06 »
yes, strange, but my downloads are too much slower. one EL sale saved the day, but still ...
477
General Stock Discussion / Re: Most likely to go under« on: February 05, 2008, 07:45 »
1. LO
2. DT 3. FP 478
General Stock Discussion / Re: January 2008 Earnings Poll« on: February 04, 2008, 17:59 »
I am happy to report that trying to reach $100, by joining SS, i made $310. this forum has been of enormous help for me. after all, i have been shooting pictures not a full year yet! to get to the modest level i am on now was both fun and a very hard work too. I still dread PS. the only tool i am comfortable is the Penn tool. I find anything else except cropping really intimidating: layers, masks.
And i do not want to learn them. 479
Computer Hardware / Re: What monitor type you're using« on: February 03, 2008, 19:45 »
15'' toshiba laptop monitor. colors are fine after calibration, but size is not enough to be efficient with PS.
480
Dreamstime.com / Re: Percentage of your subscription sales at DT in January« on: February 02, 2008, 14:13 »I'd be interested to know what everybody's average earning per download are on DT? Mine is 1.25$ as I have quite a lot of higher level images. This more than makes up for the subs as my average doesn't reach 1$ on any of the other sites I upload to. Also every sub download I get brings that image nearer to a higher level so subs really don't bother me at all at DT. mine average is $.94 per dld 481
General - Top Sites / Re: January 2008 earnings breakdown« on: February 01, 2008, 15:18 »
some do well on FT if they arrange keywords properly, and if their portfolio matches FT needs more closely. I can't think of other reasons.
482
General - Top Sites / Re: January 2008 earnings breakdown« on: January 31, 2008, 20:37 »IS 51% (BME, Up almost double) I am thinking the same that except SS, IS, FT, StockXpert , 123rf and DT uploading to other sites is a waist of time for me. SS 60% the rest: IS, FT, StockXpert , 123rf and DT. 483
Adobe Stock / Re: New sizes at Fotolia XS and XXXL« on: January 31, 2008, 14:09 »
hmm, 2-5 sales a day this month and not one today ...
484
Adobe Stock / Re: Fotolia tightening up standards a bit?« on: January 31, 2008, 06:30 »
with FT i have had three problems: rejections due to bad lightning. they were right, i was wrong. No more rejections due to bad lightning. rejections of backgrounds: I can't predict and I can't understand how they evaluate which background is suitable for them and which is not. Still most are accepted. Third is low payments per dl. If StockXpert will start producing much more dls than FT, I will stop uploading to FT because of the low payments per dl. their pricing is not fair.
485
Shutterstock.com / Re: Interesting topic at SS forum« on: January 31, 2008, 06:21 »for someone doing microstock full time for more than 1 year - 30-40k a year is very low. ...That's not really true - if it was that easy to make $30k+ then everyone would be doing it, and nobody would be jumping on threads like this one at SS with "how did you do it" questions. I'd say that perhaps 15% of microstock photographers make more than $30k annually, and all but a few have been doing it for more than one year. that is correct. If making 30,000 with photography will be that easy problems in the developing world would have been solved by giving out P&S cameras to the populace. 486
General Stock Discussion / Re: Are things going well in microstock?« on: January 30, 2008, 17:55 »Very interesting analysis Andresr:) I think at one stage the only way to increase $ is to gradually move pictures from microstock (avoiding sites with purely sub sales) to midstock. Quite a lot of agencies are present on this market now and they pay in Euros : I am thinking about mostphotos, zoonar,panthermedia...... I think too that moving to midstock sites makes sense. Let sites with subs envy midstock growth. Should we have a section devoted to midstock only discussion ? 487
Dreamstime.com / Re: Percentage of your subscription sales at DT in January« on: January 30, 2008, 09:26 »
i voted. My sub sales are 11% total (in numbers) this month.
488
StockXpert.com / Re: I just got approved at StockXpert :) Question ...« on: January 29, 2008, 12:02 »I am with StockXpert about 12 days or so and just 2 sales with 300 images. Probably I have to wait a bit. What do you think? StockXpert quickly proved your point, Danicek. 3 downloads today and the day is just half over. 489
StockXpert.com / Re: I just got approved at StockXpert :) Question ...« on: January 29, 2008, 07:36 »
I am with StockXpert about 12 days or so and just 2 sales with 300 images. Probably I have to wait a bit. What do you think?
491
Dreamstime.com / Re: Are we just unlucky?« on: January 24, 2008, 17:23 »
for me DT dropped, FT is up.
492
iStockPhoto.com / Re: Sales slowing down?« on: January 24, 2008, 12:13 »
I asked them about the slowdown they replied it was slow since the holidays. Apparently BS customers are rich and can allow themselves extended vacations.
493
General - Top Sites / Re: How is January doing for you?« on: January 24, 2008, 11:11 »
followed by LO? Obvious typo. 494
General - Top Sites / Re: How is January doing for you?« on: January 23, 2008, 09:51 »
I had a goal of $100, but thanks to joining SS has made $207 so far. without SS the count is $73.
495
Adobe Stock / Re: I got my first sale at Fotolia :)« on: January 23, 2008, 09:22 »Congratulation again. It's hilarious, I have more than an hundred pictures there now and have only 1 sale this month... I had the same feeling for FT until a month and half ago when the sales started for me. I am on Ft since Sept 22 2007. May be you have to wait a bit. 496
New Sites - General / Re: Who has most potential for 2008« on: January 22, 2008, 19:24 »Will over 5000 images in my portfolio I think I can make a statistically sound prediction.... Elena, please repeat this stats analysis from time to time. It is much more accurate that all other predictions, guesses, bias, foretelling and hidden advertising. 497
StockXpert.com / Re: Review time @ Stockxpert...« on: January 22, 2008, 17:05 »
alright, they kept their word. reviewing is done. 313 out of 464 images have survived the reviewing and now online.
498
StockXpert.com / Re: Review time @ Stockxpert...« on: January 22, 2008, 11:45 »Mine are almost always reviewed within 24 hours but I never upload more than 10 at a time. Maybe that's the secret. Also make sure that they are all keyworded, titled etc because the one time I forgot to do this they sat there a couple of days until I noticed and then once they were done they were reviewed within hours. all my images have been keyworded and titled. Anyway, I got reply from the support and right now they are actively reviewing. I was told that all images will be reviewed by the end of the day. I think part of the mess was that my id starts with v which put me at the end of the queue of the newbies. Good to know that if I submit 10 images they will be reviewed in 24 hours. 499
StockXpert.com / Re: Review time @ Stockxpert...« on: January 21, 2008, 20:26 »Hmmm, I had two batches of 15 go through today with only one reject between them ... perhaps you should send them an email. I just sent mail to the support. It is actually my third mail to them about review time since January 6th. 500
StockXpert.com / Re: Review time @ Stockxpert...« on: January 21, 2008, 20:05 »they stated finally reviewing my images. I see 7 online, 412 pending. I do not now how to view rejects. Do they send mail about rejects ? Still only 7 online and now 464 pending ! I am surprised how slow is reviewing at StockXpert. Very frustrating. |
|