|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - luissantos84
4851
« on: January 07, 2012, 22:26 »
where are you looking up the views of TS? dont think it is possible (I dont know)
my highest selling photo in TS has 80 sales and 0 at IS, with 96 views
I'm not, Luis; it was a question. Are TS views counted in Meta Data? If not,, what are all those file updates on Deep Meta?
sorry.. I am sure DM views are only from IS like earnings etc, PP is someone a hidden place lol
4852
« on: January 07, 2012, 18:46 »
where are you looking up the views of TS? dont think it is possible (I dont know)
my highest selling photo in TS has 80 sales and 0 at IS, with 96 views
4853
« on: January 07, 2012, 13:59 »
hope they will never end up here checking our comments 
4854
« on: January 07, 2012, 13:27 »
kinda sounds like faved on 123RF??
Not really. You don't get to charge more money for the faved images on 123rf
but you do have them in better search placement
4855
« on: January 07, 2012, 12:04 »
the IPTC is quite impressive too
How do you view the IPTC?
I am talking about title and description of some pics
4856
« on: January 07, 2012, 12:00 »
the IPTC is quite impressive too
4857
« on: January 07, 2012, 11:23 »
He has an odd expression on his profile picture too.
LOOOOOOOOOOL
4858
« on: January 07, 2012, 11:14 »
they are desperate he has already 169 friends!
4859
« on: January 07, 2012, 11:02 »
no popup box here
4860
« on: January 07, 2012, 09:16 »
i'm completely against video in a DSLR !
photo and video are two worlds apart.
and i'm also against video on the web !
the actual video trend is booming everywhere, 90% of the posts i see on FB are youtube videos.
and in online newspapers they're sticking videos everywhere leaving just a few lines of text.
now, if i wanted to see video i would switch on my TV rather than watching a sloppy lowres video.
it's all getting down the drain.
they can't write decent text so they put videos, and links to more useless unrelated articles, and then tons of untargeted and therefore useless advertising and Flash animations.
it's so bad that nowadays the only useful site left is wikipedia.
thats called evolution and believe you are a minority thinking that way.. youtube gotta be one of the most visited websites.. myself have it open all day long perhaps that why I keep tons of pictures pending 
4861
« on: January 07, 2012, 09:07 »
never happened with me mainly because I told them how hard it is, the perseverance you need, how things change so quickly like royalties and overall stat of stock, millions and tons of togs too.. they have also better jobs (+ money), the ones I quit
apart from that if any wanna join I will help them out, I will show them first the ton of work that is needed to get pictures ready to upload, then submit on agencies, then grow on the searches and then some sell other no.. (and not to mention the investment on camera, strobes, lens)
4862
« on: January 06, 2012, 16:00 »
I bet you are going to back-track somehow, but you are in a not a very round-about way calling Christian a liar - uncalled for and rude.
I belive you dont know well lagereek and worst "our talk" in this forum, I could actually apologise but after what he said I believe we are more than even
4863
« on: January 06, 2012, 13:27 »
Again I'm surprised by the lack of manners and courtesy, people seem to act so differently behind a keyboard then in real life.
can you please tell me where was I lacking manners? please go over my posts and quote me I am not even going to talk about what lagereek said
4864
« on: January 06, 2012, 12:05 »
seriously.. the more pro you are the more liar you are right? 70-80 sales... make it 75 365 days... make it 260 (average week days in a year) 1 year = 75 x 260 = 19500 2 years = 39k sales right (sorry but I cannot hold myself)
4865
« on: January 06, 2012, 11:16 »
I mean most of us still contribute to Fotolia even though some Europeans like me who are stuck on the US site are getting a massive chunk less than someone making the same sales living next door who signed up to the Euro paying site.
sight +1
4866
« on: January 06, 2012, 11:14 »
I wonder if the rep is still about here to comment. He showed up a while ago but hasn't replied to any of the threads since his initial intro one 
looking at your gauges I would contact them and ask for a raise (not joking)
4867
« on: January 06, 2012, 09:45 »
they dont know English?
4868
« on: January 06, 2012, 09:38 »
there is a Rejection Details "box" on the right next to the open picture
4869
« on: January 06, 2012, 08:49 »
this have been discussed here before and more than once I guess, I believe its like IS, DT and other, it depends on the price a buyer got credits or discounts (and perhaps partners too), the bigger purchase the less we will get
4870
« on: January 06, 2012, 08:29 »
same here, must be a bug once I am getting 22 cents (XS) which is right for the green ranking (44%)
4871
« on: January 05, 2012, 19:09 »
food on Amazon? candies, cookies?
4872
« on: January 05, 2012, 18:05 »
As an exclusive the sales from XXXL files are pretty nice, it's like an EL at SS (although probably just as rare). As a nonexclusive I would imagine the benefits are a little less since DT upsize all their images don't they and SS sells any size the same price.
But there are still more then enough agencies that sell large sized photos. But it's true, like you said, those happen rarely at IS, besides I've never seen so many XS and S sales anywhere else. Although they're still far too frequent for my taste
from the top 5 agencies there is only IS and FT, of course the buyer can look into a size and go there because of that
4873
« on: January 05, 2012, 16:44 »
I dont know a single thing about making footage in a DSLR but after watching that workshop and looking of what they produce there I got the feeling it was a powerfull camera to do some nice video, he also talked and said what were the best options in camera to get the most of the video too, and of course tons of equipment like you see on a behind scene of a movie, really cool tripods, dollies, rolling systems, fancy stuff
4874
« on: January 05, 2012, 16:15 »
Nikon and Canon DSLR's can't shoot video worth crap, especially if you like to move the camera around.... or avoid artifacts galore.
sorry but thats an incredible (not to say ridiculous) thing to say, dont know if you ever seen creativelive workshops (from Seattle who is owned by Chase Jarvis) which are for free during the live session.. A few time ago (July 11) there was a genius regarding film making/footage on the 5D and he said he even shoot footage for House MD serie, he is working there as one of the directors for 4 or 5 years.. his name is Gale Tattersall HDDSLR Filmmaking
For the first time in history a camera that costs roughly $2,500 can shoot material good enough to hold its own weight on the highest professional levels. Gale Tattersall, renowned Director of Photography, has been at the forefront of pushing HDDSLRs in Hollywood. He shot the season finale of House entirely on a Canon 5DMII last year.
4875
« on: January 05, 2012, 12:39 »
right basically bigger files are worth in IS and FT.. ok some other small agencies but not worth the expense
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
