51
Microstock News / Re: News: Shutterstock 2nd Second Quarter 2020 is available !
« on: July 28, 2020, 10:01 »
Their Wall street Stock is up 17% this morning. I am up 27% for this month ..I will sell today...
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 51
Microstock News / Re: News: Shutterstock 2nd Second Quarter 2020 is available !« on: July 28, 2020, 10:01 »
Their Wall street Stock is up 17% this morning. I am up 27% for this month ..I will sell today...
52
Shutterstock.com / Re: SS: What is the final goal of the protest?« on: July 25, 2020, 17:42 »
Not sure this protest is working...SS Wall Street Stock is up 11% for the month of July....That is the money SS is really concerned about...
53
Shutterstock.com / Re: 8.40$ for Enhanced License at shutterstock« on: July 17, 2020, 11:21 »
Once upon a time. SS paid me over 100 bucks for what i think we're Enhanced Licence. I may have the name wrong but back in the day i got maybe 40-50 of those EL over 100 bucks. i think the highest was around 170.00..Those were the days.....Now I am just an old man....gumming my porage.
54
General Stock Discussion / Re: What about a kickstart for a new collaborative microstock agency?« on: July 14, 2020, 22:00 »Hello, 55
Shutterstock.com / Re: LAWYERS, CLASS ACTION, NAOMI KLEIN« on: June 19, 2020, 08:08 »
To sue you would have to show damages. SS gave you fair warning they were dropping payment to you the seller . Yes they drooped payment to almost zero. No one forced you to stay and get almost no money. I see no damages. I do see a company that is bad...but no damages.
56
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock just became iStock 2.0« on: June 05, 2020, 15:30 »
But what if they went back to the old pay system. Would you take SS Wall Street stock as payment ?
57
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock just became iStock 2.0« on: June 05, 2020, 13:12 »
No one's going to like this.....but what about being paid in SS Wall Street Stock and no 10 cents sh*t. Now I know a lot of you are saying what a stupid idea and yes it is but you must admit it is original...now you can use your bad words at me...
58
General Stock Discussion / Re: Shooting for stock is overrated? A way out?« on: June 05, 2020, 11:35 »
I can shoot 30 heads in two hours on a blue background. That is 150 an hour....That is less than a plumber make but more than most photoogs make.
59
Shutterstock.com / Re: "I'm a single mother. My son and I will literally have nothing to eat."« on: June 05, 2020, 09:34 »
SS Wall Street stock is going up today...I wonder why...
60
General Stock Discussion / Re: Shooting for stock is overrated? A way out?« on: June 04, 2020, 22:31 »
Sion, you may already do this but is so easy to make some fast money. Everyone needs a good social media head shot. Go to your local office building and setup sessions for 10 bucks a head with 10 heads minium. You can shot these so fast and 10 people will turn into 20-30 people. Just like shooting ducks in a barrel. All of a sudden you have made 300 bucks in two hours and this may turn into other photo work the offices need.
61
Dreamstime.com / Re: Dreamstime increasing royalties« on: June 04, 2020, 15:57 »
I just got a $2.00 and $13.34 sale on Dreamtime today. At the rate SS is going for me that will be three weeks total sales on SS.
62
Shutterstock.com / Re: I GOT A SINGLE & OTHER FOR $0.10!!!!!!« on: June 04, 2020, 12:23 »
Astrantia, no one wants to hear this also but it is true. My wife before she retired was a large buyer of images for a large corporation. She had accounts with Istock and SS. Her only goal was to find images that were correct for her assignment ASAP. She did not care what the price was as she has accounts already setup. All she wanted were images or illustrations that would work. We all think our images are special and they are to us. To my wife the buyer of images it was just a job finding images and she wanted to finnish her job so she could go home that day without working overtime that night.
63
Shutterstock.com / Re: I GOT A SINGLE & OTHER FOR $0.10!!!!!!« on: June 04, 2020, 12:05 »
Tpack you may be correct as i really don't know much about Wall Street. Then I don't know of many industries that go up 60-75% in sales/profit in one quarter. Even Amazon dose not reach those number. As in most situations the artist always lose and the jerks win. I just would love to win once in my life.
64
Shutterstock.com / Re: I GOT A SINGLE & OTHER FOR $0.10!!!!!!« on: June 04, 2020, 11:48 »
SSTK....That is the Stock Symbol for SS. What I am going to say no one is going to like but this is one way to make some of your money back from SS. I really can't figure out how much money I am going to lose from my photos at SS but it is quite significant. My 38 cents sells are now 10-17 cents each. My 2.85 sells are now 87 cents. So it looks like I will lose somewhere in 60-75 % of my sells /dollars from last year. If my math is even close to correct SS (SSTK) Wall Street stock will have a huge increase in profits(60-75%) . Which means their Wall Street stock will go up , a lot. Buy their stock SSTK now and sell it when it goes up. It will go up most likely. No this is not what anyone here on microstock group wants to hear but this is one way of getting some of your losses back. I really see no other way. If you stay on SS with your photos you will lose money, if you close your account you will lose money. Yes this is a creepy/sorry way to get your money back but I see no other way if you want your money back. Money is not everthing and yes I know dignity is important but neather of these items buys you food or photo equipment. i am guessing this post will get some haters.
65
Shutterstock.com / Re: Is there something more to the SS royalty cut« on: June 03, 2020, 15:42 »
Thanks, about Bill Gates...you are correct...
66
Shutterstock.com / Re: Is there something more to the SS royalty cut« on: June 03, 2020, 15:34 »
I may have this incorrect. Correct me if so. Wasn't IStock at on time owned by Bill Gates and he sold it to Getty ?? Maybe Amazon or Apple want to buy SS. They both have lots of cash on hand and SS would fit in their portfolo. Both are in the Movie industry and a Stock company makes sense..
67
Shutterstock.com / Re: I GOT A SINGLE & OTHER FOR $0.10!!!!!!« on: June 03, 2020, 10:45 »
Fast racer I am not sure what I am going to do with my SS account. I do know it is not worth time to upload new for 10 cents each. That I do know.
68
Shutterstock.com / Re: I GOT A SINGLE & OTHER FOR $0.10!!!!!!« on: June 03, 2020, 10:36 »
As of this week for the first time in 15 years my Adobe account is the highest paying of all the sites this week for me. I am guessing that will be the trend from now on. I have not canceled my SS account but will stop uploading new images. At 10 cents a sell it just is not worth it to upload new images. I am at level 4 and I am now getting 10-14 cents an image. SS is truly dead....
69
Adobe Stock / Re: Mat Hayward - Affiliate link to direct customer to my portfolio at Adobe Stock« on: June 01, 2020, 22:06 »
Mat also SS has a direct button to share your SS portfolio on Twitter/facebook with one mouse click.... Can one be made for Adobe... Thanks, Scott
70
Shutterstock.com / Re: I GOT A SINGLE & OTHER FOR $0.10!!!!!!« on: June 01, 2020, 12:23 »
I just got my first 10 cent sale from SS on this photo. The good news, this has been a good seller and I have made a couple of thousand dollars of the lifetime of image. The next couple of thousand at 10 cents will take a long time.
71
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock just became iStock 2.0« on: May 29, 2020, 15:03 »
My sells today are higher on Adobe than SS..Anyone else...
72
General Stock Discussion / Re: Anyone have experience with Design Pics Inc. ?« on: May 29, 2020, 14:47 »
I don't know them but Crestock still owes me money from many years back. Crestock was such a waste of time...Will SS be the next Crestock ?
73
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock just became iStock 2.0« on: May 29, 2020, 14:14 »
Question , I think I know the answer. Is any SS contributor/s on the board of Directors of SS. I assume not... If so why . not . Without Contributors you have no SS. Most Corporations have 6-15 board members. SS needs Photographer Contributors on their board. I do assure you this bad revenue decision was voted yes by the SS board of Directors..
74
Shutterstock.com / Re: Shutterstock just became iStock 2.0« on: May 29, 2020, 14:00 »
In 2019 Shutterstock celebrated a payout milestone. June 1st 2020, they plan to slash royalties for all contributors. More profits for SS, much less for SS contributors. Please rethink this bad PR decision SS. "We the Contributors" can work as a team with SS. It is not too late and make everyone happy with more revenues for all..
75
Adobe Stock / Re: Lets start a petition to get Adobe to accept Editorial - now is the time!« on: May 29, 2020, 13:49 »
I would love my editorial to go to Adobe. I am a small fish but have maybe 600 or 700 editorial images ready to go. Adobe is now my favorite stock site...."We the Submitters" love Adobe.....
|
|